Avoiding legal pitfalls in surrogacy arrangements

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 862-867

  James, Summer ^a   Chilvers, Rebecca ^a   Havemann, Dara ^a   Phelps, John Y ^a  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Gestational carrier; Gestational contract; Law; Litigation; Surrogacy

Indexed keywords

CONTRACT; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GESTATIONAL SURROGACY; INFECTION; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LAW SUIT; LEGAL ASPECT; REVIEW; SCREENING; STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS;

EID: 78649644162     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.037     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. 21 CFR Part 1271, Subpart C.
2. A.G.R. v. Brisman, 08-cv-01716.
3. A.H.W. v. G.H.B. 772 A.2d 948.
4. A.R.S. § 25-218.
5. Belsito v. Clark, 1994. 67 Ohio Misc. 2d 54, 6, 644 N.E.2d 760.
6. S.M. Benardo, and K. Benardo Egg donation and surrogacy arrangements in law and practice Bloomberg Corporate Law J. 2 2007 406 413
7. Bovard v. American Horse Enterprises, 247 Cal. Rptr. 340, 1988.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report: Section 2-ART Cycles Using Fresh, Nondonor Eggs or Embryos. Available from: < http://www.cdc.gov/art/ART2005/section2c.htm >.
9. Chapter 15: IVF Surrogacy, 2007. Fertil. Steril. 87(Suppl. 1), S50-S51.
10. Committee on Ethics, 2008. ACOG Committee Opinion 2008 No. 397: Surrogate Motherhood, 111:465-470.
11. D.C. Code §§ 16-401 to -402.
12. D.A. Duffy, J.C. Nulsen, D.B. Maier, L. Engmann, D. Schmidt, and C.A. Benadiva Obstetrical complications in gestational carrier pregnancies Fertil. Steril. 83 2005 749 754
13. FLA. STAT §§ 742.11-15.
14. Hodas v. Morin, 422 Mass. 544, 814 N.E.2d 320, 2004.
15. Huddleston v. Infertility Center of America, 700 A.2d 453, Penn, 1997.
16. In Re: Marriage of Moschetta, 25 Cal. App. 1218, 1994.
17. Itskov v. N.Y. Fertility Inst., 782 N.Y.S.2d 584, 588-589, Civ. Ct., 2004.
18. Johnson v. Calvert, 1993. 5 Cal.4th 84, 851 P.2d 776, 19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 494.
19. Johnson, M.A., Clay, S.M., 2004. Managing legal risk in the assisted reproductive technologies environment: Part II. Keeping out of the sand traps in third party reproduction cases, February 2004. Available from: < http://www.surrogacylaw.com/biography.htm >.
20. K.M. v. E.G., 117 P.3d at 677.
21. A.M. Larkey Redefining motherhood: determining legal maternity in gestational surrogacy arrangements Drake Law Rev. 51 2003 605
22. J. Luk, and J.C. Petrozza Evaluation of compliance and range of fees among American Society of Reproductive Medicine-listed egg donor and surrogacy agencies J. Reprod. Med. 53 2008 847 852
23. Matter of Baby M, 109 N.J. 396, 537 A.2d 1227, 77 A.L.R. 4th 1, 1988.
24. MCLS prec §§ 722.851-.863.
25. Mid-South Ins. Co. v. John Doe, Frank Roe, Mary Roe, and Celtic Ins. Co., 274 F.Supp.2d 757, 2003.
26. N.D. Cent. Code §§ 14-18-01 to -08; 14-19-01; 14-20-01 to -66.
27. N.J. STAT § 9:3-41.
28. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2008. Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation: a Practice Committee report. Fertil. Steril. 90(Suppl. 3), S30-S44.
29. Rev. Code Wash §§ 26.26.011 to.903.
30. Stiver v. Parker, 975 F.2d 261 C.A.6 (Mich.), 1992.
31. Tex. Fam. Code Ann § 160.753-756.
32. Tex. Fam. Code Section 2.001.
33. Uniform Parentage Act, 2002.
34. Utah Code Ann §§ 78-45g-801 to -809. www.sart.org.