Soft tissue damage after minimally invasive THA: A comparison of 5 approaches

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 81, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 696-702

  Van Oldenrijk, Jakob ^a   Hoogland, Piet V J M ^b   Tuijthof, Gabrille J M ^a   Corveleijn, Ruby ^b   Noordenbos, Tom W H ^b   Schafroth, Matthias U ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRESH FROZEN PLASMA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCISION; LIGAMENT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE INJURY; MUSCLE INNERVATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SOFT TISSUE DEFECT; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; TENSOR FASCIA LATA MUSCLE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CADAVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGAMENTS; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NERVE TISSUE; SOFT TISSUE INJURIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 78649642705     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2010.537804     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baker A S, Bitounis V C. Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1989; 71: 47-50.
2. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W. The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1979; 95: 47-9.
3. Berger R A, Duwelius P J. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 2004; 35: 163-72.
4. Bertin K C, Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modifed Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop 2004; (429): 248-55.
5. Coyle D, Coyle K, Vale K, de Verteuil R, Imamura M, Glazener C, Zhu S. Minimally Invasive Arthroplasty in the Management of Hip Arthritic Dis-ease: Systematic Review and Economic Evaluation [Technology report number 102]. 2008. Ottawa, Canada, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Available from http://www.cadth.ca
6. Gonzales R, Woods R. Colour image processing. In: Digital Image Process-ing. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002; 2: 282-348.
7. Gottschalk F, Kourosh S, Leveau B. The functional anatomy of tensor fasciae latae and gluteus medius and minimus. J Anat 1989; 166: 179-89.
8. Hewitt J D, Glisson R R, Guilak F, Vail T P. The mechanical properties of the human hip capsule ligaments. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 82-9.
9. Ince A, Kemper M, Waschke J, Hendrich C. Minimally invasive anterolateral approach to the hip: risk to the superior gluteal nerve. Acta Orthop 2007; 78: 86-9.
10. Jacobs L G, Buxton R A. The course of the superior gluteal nerve in the lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1989; 71: 1239-43.
11. Kenny P, O'Brien C P, Synnott K, Walsh M G. Damage to the superior glu-teal nerve after two different approaches to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999; 81: 979-81.
12. Lavigne P, Loriot de Rouvray T H. The superior gluteal nerve. Anatomical study of its extrapelvic portion and surgical resolution by trans-gluteal approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1994; 80: 188-95.
13. Mardones R, Pagnano M W, Nemanich J P, Trousdale R T. The Frank Stinch-feld Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop 2005; (441): 63-7.
14. Meneghini R M, Pagnano M W, Trousdale R T, Hozack W J. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop 2006; (453): 293-8.
15. Noble P C, Johnston J D, Alexander J A, Thompson M T, Usrey M M, Hein-rich E M, Landon G C, Mathis K B. Making minimally invasive THR safe: conclusions from biomechanical simulation and analysis. Int Orthop (Suppl 1) 2007; 31: S25-S28.
16. Pfrrmann C W, Notzli H P, Dora C, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymp-tomatic and symptomatic patients. Radiology 2005; 235: 969-76.
17. Picado C H, Garcia F L, Marques W, Jr. Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after direct lateral approach to the hip. Clin Orthop 2007; (455): 209-11.
18. Rachbauer F. Mnimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Anterior approach. Orthopade 2006; 35: 723-9.
19. Ramesh M, O'Byrne J M, McCarthy N, Jarvis A, Mahalingham K, Cashman W F. Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after the Hardinge approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996; 78: 903-6.
20. Sculco T P, Boettner F. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the posterior approach. Instr Course Lect 2006; 55: 205-14.
21. Sharma V, Morgan P M, Cheng E Y. Factors Infuencing Early Rehabilitation After THA: A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop 2009; (467): 1400-11.
22. Siebenrock K A, Rosler K M, Gonzalez E, Ganz R. Intraoperative electro-myography of the superior gluteal nerve during lateral approach to the hip for arthroplasty: a prospective study of 12 patients. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 867-70.
23. Stahelin T. Abductor repair failure and nerve damage during hip replacement via the transgluteal approach. Why less invasive methods of joint replace-ment are needed, and some approaches to solving the problems. Orthopade 2006; 35: 1215-24.
24. Suh K T, Park B G, Choi Y J. A posterior approach to primary total hip arthroplasty with soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop 2004; (418): 162-7.
25. Svensson O, Skold S, Blomgren G. Integrity of the gluteus medius after the transgluteal approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5: 57-60.