Gabriel graph of geomagnetic Sq variations

Acta Geophysica

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 973-987

  Sridharan, Muthusamy ^a   Ramasamy, Ayyathurai M S ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF GEOMAGNETISM   (India)

^b PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Euclidean distance; Gabriel graph; geomagnetic Sq variation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD; EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE; GABRIEL GRAPH; GEOMAGNETIC CONDITIONS; GEOMAGNETIC SQ VARIATION; HYDERABAD; LOW LATITUDES; THEORETICAL MODELS;

BUILDINGS; DATA REDUCTION; GRAPH THEORY; IONOSPHERE; MAGNETIC FIELDS; OBSERVATORIES;

GEOMAGNETISM;

ELECTROJET; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; IONOSPHERE; NUMERICAL MODEL;

EID: 78649636541     PISSN: 18956572     EISSN: 18957455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/s11600-010-0004-y     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alex, S., L. Jadhav, and D. R. K. Rao (1992), Complexities in the variation of declination component (D) of the geomagnetic field in the Indian region, Mem. Geol. Soc. India24, 263-274.
2. Alex, S., B. D. Kadam, and D. R. K. Rao (1998), Ionospheric current systems on days of low equatorial ΔH, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 60, 3, 371-379, DOI: 10. 1016/S1364-6826(97)00075-8.
3. Aupetit, M. (2003), High-dimensional labeled data analysis with Gabriel graphs, Proc. Intl. European Symp. on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges, Belgium, 21-26.
4. Baker, W. G., and D. F. Martyn (1953), Electric currents in the ionosphere. I. The conductivity, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 246, 913, 281-294, DOI: 10. 1098/rsta. 1953. 0016.
5. Bhardwaj, S. K., and G. K. Rangarajan (1994), Solar control of the day-to-day variability in the equatorial geomagnetic field, Indian J. Radio Space Phys. 23, 326-333.
6. Campbell, H. (ed.) (1997), Introduction to Geomagnetic Fields, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Foulds, L. R. (1992), Graph Theory Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 385 pp.
8. Gross, J. L., and J. Yellen (1999), Graph Theory and its Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton-London-New York.
9. Gross, J. L., and J. Yellen (2003), Handbook of Graph Theory, CRC Press, New York.
10. Heckel, B., and B. Hamann (1998), Visualization of cluster hierarchies, Proc. SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 3298, 162-171.
11. Rajaram, M. (1980), Method of natural orthogonal components applied to equatorial geomagnetic variations, Ann. Geophys. 36, 599-603.
12. Rajaram, M. (1983), Determination of the latitude of Sq focus and its relation to the electrojet variations, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 45, 8/9, 573-578.
13. Sridharan, M., and A. M. S. Ramasamy (2002), Multidimensional scaling technique for analysis of magnetic storms at Indian observatories, J. Earth System Science111, 4, 459-465, DOI: 10. 1007/BF02702058.
14. Sridharan, M., and S. Selvaraj (2009), Multi dimensional scaling of geomagnetic Sq(H) variations, Indian J. Radio Space Phys. 38, 165-173.
15. Sridharan, M., N. Gururajan, and A. M. S. Ramasamy (2005), Fuzzy clustering analysis to study geomagnetic coastal effects, Ann. Geophys. 23, 1157-1163.
16. Srivastava, B. J., H. Abbas, T. Rama Gopal, D. R. K. Rao, and B. M. Pathan (2001), Geomagnetic coast and other effects deduced from the new observatory at Visakhapatnam, India, Geophys. J. Int. 146, 3, 827-832, DOI: 10. 1046/ j. 0956-540x. 2001. 01499. x.
17. Yacob, A. (1975), Latitudinal profile in India of Sq(H) range and of its prominent periodicities, Pure Appl. Geophys. 113, 1, 601-609, DOI: 10. 1007/ BF01592945.
18. Yacob, A., and A. K. Sen (1974), On quiet-day maximum minimum and range in H, Pure Appl. Geophys. 112, 2, 464-471, DOI: 10. 1007/BF00876154.
19. Zhang, W., and I. King (2002), A study of relationship between support vector machine and Gabriel graph, Proc. IEEE Intl. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks1, 239-244.