Damage identification by response surface based model updating using D-optimal design

Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 717-733

  Fang, Sheng En ^a   Perera, Ricardo ^b  

^a FUZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

D optimal designs; Damage identification; Model updating; Parameter screening; Response surface modeling

Indexed keywords

D-OPTIMAL DESIGNS; DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION; MODEL UPDATING; PARAMETER SCREENING; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELING;

DESIGN; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FORECASTING; MODELS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STATISTICAL MECHANICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

EID: 78649634873     PISSN: 08883270     EISSN: 10961216     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. S.W. Doebling, C.R. Farrar, and M.B. Prime A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods The Shock and Vibration Digest 30 2 1998 91 105
2. Y.J. Yan, L. Cheng, Z.Y. Wu, and L.H. Yam Development in vibration-based structural damage detection technique Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 21 5 2007 2198 2211
3. Y.J. Yan, L.H. Yam, L. Cheng, and L. Yu FEM modeling method of damage structures for structural damage detection Composite Structures 72 2 2006 193 199
4. Y.J. Yan, H.N. Hao, and L.H. Yam Vibration-based construction and extraction of structural damage feature index International Journal of Solids and Structures 41 2425 2004 6661 6676
5. M.I. Friswell, and J.E. Mottershead Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, Netherlands
6. S.E. Fang, R. Perera, and G.D. Roeck Damage identification of a reinforced concrete frame by finite element model updating using damage parameterization Journal of Sound and Vibration 313 35 2008 544 559
7. R. Perera, A. Ruiz, and C. Manzano An evolutionary multiobjective framework for structural damage localization and quantification Engineering Structures 29 10 2007 2540 2550
8. R. Perera, and A. Ruiz A multistage FE updating procedure for damage identification in large-scale structures based on multiobjective evolutionary optimization Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 22 4 2008 970 991
9. R. Perera, S.E. Fang, and C. Huerta Structural crack detection without updated baseline model by single and multiobjective optimization Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 23 3 2009 752 768
10. M.J. Atalla, and D.J. Inman On model updating using neural networks Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 12 1 1998 135 161
11. J.J. Lee, J.W. Lee, J.H. Yi, C.B. Yun, and H.Y. Jung Neural networks-based damage detection for bridges considering errors in baseline finite element models Journal of Sound and Vibration 289 2005 555 578
12. D.C. Montgomery Design and Analysis of Experiments sixth ed 2004 John Wiley & Sons
13. G.E.P. Box, and K.B. Wilson On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B 13 1951 1 45
14. G.E.P. Box, and N.R. Draper Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics 1987 John Wiley & Sons New York
15. R.H. Myers, and D.C. Montgomery Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments second ed 2002 John Wiley & Sons New York
16. Q.T. Guo, L.M. Zhang, Finite element model updating based on response surface methodology, in: Proceeding of the 22nd International Modal Analysis Conference Dearborn, Michigan, 2004.
17. M.Y. Deng, W.X. Ren, and F.M. Wang Structure finite element model updating based on static-load response surface methodology Journal of Experimental Mechanics 23 2 2008 103 109 (in Chinese)
18. W.X. Ren, and H.B. Chen Finite element model updating in structural dynamics by using response surface method Engineering Structures 32 8 2010 2455 2465
19. A.L. Cundy, Use of response surface metamodels in damage identification of dynamic structures, Master Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002.
20. S.E. Fang, and R. Perera A response surface methodology based damage identification technique Smart Materials and Structures 18 6 2009 1 14
21. J.B. Michael, and R.D. Norman On minimum-point second-order designs Technometrics 16 4 1974 613 616
22. D.K. Lin Another look at first-order saturated designs: the p-efficient designs Technometrics 35 3 1993 284
23. R. Unal, R.A. Lepscht, M.L. McMillin, Response surface model building and multidisciplinary optimization using D-optimal designs, in: Annual AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, seventh, St. Louis, MO, USA, 1998, pp. 1031.
24. W.C. Carpenter, Effect of design selection on response surface performance, NASA Contractor Report 4520, 1993.
25. Design Expert®, version 7.0, Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, MN, 2005.
26. Ansys®, User's Manual, Revision 8.0, Swanson Analysis System, USA, 2003.
27. Matlab® rev. 6.5 (Release 13), MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA, 2002.
28. F.W. Gembicki, Vector optimization for control with performance and parameter sensitivity indices, Ph.D. Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 1974.
29. C.R. Farrar, W.E. Baker, T.M. Bell, K.M. Cone, T.W. Darling, T.A. Duffey, A. Eklund, A. Migliori, Dynamic characterization and damage detection in the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report: LA-12767-MS, 1996.
30. C.R. Farrar, T.A. Duffey, P.A. Goldman, D.V. Jauregui, J.S. Vigil, Finite element analysis of the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report: LA-12979-MS, 1996.