Supersolid and charge-density-wave states from anisotropic interaction in an optical lattice

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Chan, Y H ^a   Han, Y J ^a   Duan, L M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPIC INTERACTION; BOSE HUBBARD MODEL; DIPOLE INTERACTION; EFFECTIVE HAMILTONIAN; HARD-CORE BOSONS; MAGNETIC ATOMS; MOTT INSULATOR STATE; NETWORK ALGORITHMS; OPTICAL LATTICES; POLAR MOLECULES; QUANTUM PHASIS; REPULSIVE INTERACTIONS; SUPERSOLID PHASE; SUPERSOLIDS; TWO DIMENSIONAL SQUARE LATTICE;

ANISOTROPY; CRYSTAL LATTICES; HUBBARD MODEL; MAGNETIC PROPERTIES; OPTICAL MATERIALS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

PHASE TRANSITIONS;

EID: 78649627042     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.053607     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. K.-K. Ni et al., Science 322, 231 (2008)
2. Nature (London) 464, 1324 (2010).
3. T. Koch et al., Nat. Phys. 4, 218 (2008)
4. M. Lu, S.-H. Youn, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 063001 (2010).
5. E. Kimand M. H. W. Chan, Nature (London) 427, 225 (2004).
6. P. Sengupta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 207202 (2005).
7. G. G. Batrouni and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1599 (2000).
8. F. Hebert et al., Phys. Rev. B 65, 014513 (2001).
9. S. Wessel and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 127205 (2005).
10. B. Capogrosso-Sansone et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 125301 (2010).
11. I. Danshita and C. A. R. Sa de Melo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 225301 (2009)
12. S. Yi, T. Li, and C. P. Sun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 260405 (2007).
13. N. Syassen et al., Science 320, 1329 (2008)
14. J. J. Garcia-Ripoll et al., New J. Phys. 11, 013053 (2009)
15. Y.-J. Han et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 070404 (2009).
16. J. Jordan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 250602 (2008).
17. J. Jordan, R.Orus, and G.Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 79, 174515 (2009).
18. B. Bauer, G.Vidal, and M. Troyer, J. Stat.Mech. (2009) P09006.
19. We have looked at the convergence for a number of different paramaters of the Hamiltonian, and the convergence error has about the same order of magnitudes as those shown in Fig. 1.