Food selection by barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis) in an Arctic pre-breeding area

Polar Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 404-412

  Soininen, Eeva M ^a   Hübner, Christiane E ^b   Jónsdóttir, Ingibjörg S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN POLAR INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Dietary analysis; Food preferences; Grass tiller size; Interactions; Moss; Plant herbivore; Stopover ecology

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; DIET; DIGESTIBILITY; FECES; FEEDING ECOLOGY; FOOD PREFERENCE; FOOD SELECTION; GRASS; NUTRIENT UPTAKE; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; TILLERING; WATERFOWL;

ARCTIC; SPITSBERGEN; SVALBARD; SVALBARD AND JAN MAYEN; VARSOLBUKTA;

ANSER; BRANTA LEUCOPSIS; BRYOPHYTA; POACEAE; THORACICA;

EID: 78649614297     PISSN: 08000395     EISSN: 17518369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-8369.2010.00172.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aebischer N.J., Robertson P.A. & Kenward R.E. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74, 1313-1325.
2. Alsos I.G., Elvebakk A. & Gabrielsen G.W. 1998. Vegetation exploitation by barnacle geese Branta leucopsis during incubation on Svalbard. Polar Research 17, 1-14.
3. Anderson W.B. & Polis G.A. 1999. Nutrient fluxes from water to land: seabirds affect plant nutrient status on Gulf of California islands. Oecologia 118, 324-332.
4. Arzel C., Elmberg J. & Guillemain M. 2006. Ecology of spring-migrating Anatidae: a review. Journal of Ornithology 147, 167-184.
5. Black J.M., Prop J. & Larsson K. 2007. Wild goose dilemmas. Groeningen: Branta.
6. Born E.W. & Böcher J. 2001. The ecology of Greenland. Nuuk: Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources.
7. Bos D., Drent R.H., Rubinigg M. & Stahl J. 2005. The relative importance of food biomass and quality for patch and habitat choice in brent geese Branta bernicla. Ardea 93, 5-16.
8. Burnham K.P. & Anderson D.R. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd edn. New York: Springer.
9. Carriére S. 2002. Photographic key for the microhistological identication of some Arctic vascular plants. Arctic 55, 247-268.
10. Cargill S.M. & Jefferies R.L. 1984. The effects of grazing by lesser snow geese on the vegetation of a sub-Arctic salt marsh. Journal of Applied Ecology 21, 669-686.
11. Chapin F.S. III, Johnson D.A. & McKendrick J.D. 1980. Seasonal movement of nutrients in plants of differing growth forms in an Alaskan tundra ecosystem, implications for herbivory. Journal of Ecology 68, 189-209.
12. Crawley M.J. 1983. Herbivory: the dynamics of animal-plant interactions. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Demment M.V. & Van Soest P.J. 1985. A nutritional explanation for body size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. American Naturalist 125, 641-672.
14. Drent R.H., Both D., Green M., Madsen J. & Piersma T. 2003. Pay-offs and penalties of competing migratory schedules. Oikos 103, 274-292.
15. Dumont B., Carriére P. & D'Hour P. 2002. Foraging in patchy grasslands: diet selection by sheep and cattle is affected by the abundance and spatial distribution of preferred species. Animal Research 51, 367-381.
16. Ebbinge B.S. & Spaans B. 1995. The importance of body reserves accumulated in spring staging areas in the temperate zone for breeding in dark-bellied brent geese Branta b. bernicla in the High Arctic. Journal of Avian Biology 26, 105-113.
17. Edwards G.R., Newman J.A., Parsons A.J. & Krebs J.R. 1994. Effects of the scale and spatial distribution of the food resource and animal state on diet selection: an example with sheep. Journal of Animal Ecology 63, 816-826.
18. Fox A.D. & Bergersen L. 2005. Lack of competition between barnacle geese Branta leucopsis and pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus during the pre-breeding period in Svalbard. Journal of Avian Biology 36, 173-178.
19. Fox A.D., Eide N.E., Bergesen E. & Madsen J. 2009. Resource partitioning in sympatric Arctic-breeding geese: summer habitat use, spatial and dietary overlap of barnacle and pink-footed geese in Svalbard. Ibis 151, 122-133.
20. Gendron R.P. & Staddon J.E.R. 1983. Searching for cryptic prey: the effect of search rate. American Naturalist 121, 172-186.
21. Glahder C.M., Fox A.D., Hübner C.E., Madsen J. & Tombre I.M. 2006. Pre-nesting site use of satellite transmitter tagged Svalbard pink-footed geese. Ardea 94, 679-690.
22. Hassal M., Riddington R. & Helden A. 2001. Foraging behavior of brent geese, Branta b. bernicla, on grasslands: effects of sward length and nitrogen content. Oecologia 127, 97-104.
23. Hübner C.E. 2006. The importance of pre-breeding sites in the Arctic barnacle goose Branta leucopsis. Ardea 94, 701-713.
24. Hübner C.E. 2007. Spring stopover in the Arctic: implications for migrating geese and their food plants. PhD thesis, University Centre in Svalbard.
25. Jones K.A., Krebs J.R. & Whittingham M.J. 2006. Interaction between seed crypsis and habitat structure influence patch choice in a granivorous bird, the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Journal of Avian Biology 37, 413-418.
26. Kristiansen J.N., Fox A.D. & Nachman G. 2000. Does size matter? Maximizing nutrient and biomass intake by shoot selection amongst herbivorous geese. Ardea 88, 119-125.
27. Longton R.E. 1997. The role of bryophytes and lichens in polar ecosystems. In S.J. Woodin & M.E. Marquiss (eds.): Ecology of Arctic environments. Pp. 69-96. Blackwell, Oxford.
28. Manseau M. & Gauthier G. 1993. Interactions between greater snow geese and their rearing habitat. Ecology 74, 2045-2055.
29. Markkola J., Niemelä M. & Rytkönen S. 2003. Diet selection of lesser white-fronted geese Anser erythropus at a spring staging area. Ecography 26, 705-714.
30. Mehlum F. 1998. Areas in Svalbard important for geese during the pre-breeding, breeding and post-breeding periods. In F. Mehlum et al. (eds.): Proceedings of the Svalbard Goose Symposium, Oslo, Norway, 23-26 September 1997. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 200. Pp. 41-55. Tromsø: Norwegian Polar Institute.
31. Norberg R.A. 1977. An ecological theory on foraging time and energetics and choice of optimal food-searching method. Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 511-529.
32. Owen M. 1980. Wild geese of the world. London: BT Batsford.
33. Parsons A.J., Thornley J.H.M., Newman J. & Penning D.P. 1994. A mechanistic model of some physical determinants of intake rate and diet selection in a two-species temperate grassland sward. Functional Ecology 8, 187-204.
34. Prop J. & Black M.J. 1998. Food intake, body reserves and reproductive success of barnacle geese Branta leucopsis staging in different habitats. In F. Mehlum et al. (eds.): Proceedings of the Svalbard Goose Symposium, Oslo, Norway, 23-26 September 1997. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 200. Pp. 175-193. Tromsø: Norwegian Polar Institute.
35. Prop J. & De Vries J. 1993. Impact of snow and food conditions on the reproductive performance of barnacle geese Branta leucopsis. Ornis Scandinavica 24, 110-121.
36. Prop J., Van Eerden M.R. & Drent R.H. 1984. Reproductive success of the barnacle goose Branta leucopsis in relation to food exploitation on the breeding grounds, western Spitsbergen. In F. Mehlum & M. Ogilvie (eds.): Current research on Artic geese. Proceedings of a symposium at Voksenåsen, Oslo, 24-26 October 1983. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 181. Pp. 87-117. Oslo: Norwegian Polar Institute.
37. Prop J. & Vulink T. 1992. Digestion by barnacle geese in the annual cycle-the interplay between retention time and food quality. Functional Ecology 6, 180-189.
38. R Development Core Team 2008. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
39. Sedinger J.S. & Raveling D.G. 1986. Timing of nesting by Canada geese in relation to the phenology and availability of their food plants. Journal of Animal Ecology 55, 1083-1102.
40. Spaethe J., Tautz J. & Chittka L. 2001. Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees: flower size and color affect search time and flight behaviour. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 3898-3903.
41. Stahl J. & Loonen M.J.J.E. 1998. Effects of predation risk on site selection of barnacle geese during brood-rearing. In F. Mehlum et al. (eds.): Proceedings of the Svalbard Goose Symposium, Oslo, Norway, 23-26 September 1997. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 200. Pp. 67-79. Tromsø: Norwegian Polar Institute.
42. Thornley J.H.M., Parsons A.J., Newman J. & Penning P.D. 1994. A cost-benefit model of grazing intake and diet selection in a two-species temperate grassland sward. Functional Ecology 8, 5-16.
43. Van Der Graaf A.J., Coehoorn P. & Stahl J. 2006. Sward height and bite size affect the functional response of barnacle geese Branta leucopsis. Journal of Ornithology 147, 479-484.
44. Van Der Graaf A.J., Stahl J., Klimkowska A., Bakker J.P. & Drent R.H. 2006. Surfing on a green wave-how plant growth drives spring migration in the barnacle goose. Ardea 94, 567-577.
45. Van Der Wal R., Van Lieshout S.M.J. & Loonen M.J.J.E. 2001. Herbivore impact on moss depth, soil temperature and Arctic plant growth. Polar Biology 24, 29-32.
46. Wallis de Vries M.F. 1996. Effects of resource distribution patterns on ungulate foraging behaviour: a modeling approach. Forest Ecology and Management 88, 167-177.