Rejoinder

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 103, Issue 484, 2008, Pages 1353-1356

  Shadish, William R ^a   Clark, M H ^b   Steiner, Peter M ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Austria)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649577425     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1198/016214508000001020     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Cook, T. D., Shadish,W. R., and Wong, V. C. (2008), "Three Conditions Under Which Experiments and Observational Studies Produce Comparable Causal Estimates: New Findings From Within-Study Comparisons," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 724-750.
2. Kownacki, R. J., and Shadish, W. R. (1999), "Does Alcoholics Anonymous Work? The Results From a Meta-Analysis of Controlled Experiments," Substance Use and Misuse, 34, 1897-1916.
3. Kuss, O., Legler, T., and Borgermann, J. (2008), "Do Randomized and Non-Randomized Trials Yield Different Answers in Similar Populations? Evidence From a "Meta-Propensity Score" Analysis in Cardiac Surgery," presented at the Fourth Symposium on Causality, Jena, Germany, available at http://www.metheval.uni-jena.de/projekte/symposium2008/program.php?&lang=en.
4. Peikes, D. N., Moreno, L., and Orzol, S. M. (2008), "Propensity Score Matching: A Note of Caution for Evaluators of Social Programs," The American Statistician, 62, 222-231.
5. Pohl, S., Eisermann, J., and Soellner, R. (2008), "A Randomized Experiment Comparing Random to Nonrandom Assignment: A Replication of Shadish and Clark," presented at the Fourth Symposium on Causality, Jena, Germany, available at http://www.metheval.uni-jena.de/projekte/symposium2008/program.php? &lang=en.
6. Shadish, W. R. (2008), "An Empirical Program of Quasi- Experimentation," presented at the Fourth Symposium on Causality, Jena, Germany, available at http://www.metheval.uni-jena.de/projekte/symposium2008/ program.php?&lang=en.
7. Shadish, W. R., and Cook, T. D. (2009), "The Renaissance of Field Experimentation for Evaluating Interventions," Annual Review of Psychology, 60.
8. Shadish,W. R., and Ragsdale, K. (1996), "Random Versus Nonrandom Assignment in Controlled Experiments: Do You Get the Same Answer?" Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1290-1305.
9. Shadish, W. R., Matt, G. E., Navarro, A. M., and Phillips, G. (2000), "The Effects of Psychological Therapies Under Clinically Representative Conditions: A Meta-Analysis," Psychological Bulletin, 126, 512-529.
10. Steiner, P. M., Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., and Clark, M. H. (2008), "Differential Role of Covariate Selection in Controlling for Selection Bias in Observational Studies," unpublished manuscript, Institution for Policy Research, Northwestern University.
11. West, S. G., and Thoemmes, F. (2008), "Observational Studies: Towards Improving Design and Analysis," presented at the Fourth Symposium on Causality, Jena, Germany, available at http://www.metheval.uni-jena.de/ projekte/symposium2008/program.php?&lang=en.