Medical education research: The importance of research design and a programmatic approach

Medical Education

Volumn 44, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1161-1163

  Carnahan, Heather ^a   Dubrowski, Adam ^a   Walsh, Catharine M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; TEACHING;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 78649559235     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03879.x     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Roels P, Van Roosmalen G, Van Soom C. Adaptive feedback and student behaviour in computer-assisted instruction. Med Educ 2010;44:1185-93.
2. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Med Educ 2006;40(8):792-7.
3. Dubrowski A, Carnahan H, Reznick R. Research in surgical education: a primer. In: Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Debas H, eds. Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology. Heidelberg: Springer 2010;99-112.
4. Hacking I. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983;149-66.
5. Stufflebeam DL. The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. J Res Dev Educ 1972;5 (1):19-25.
6. Stufflebeam DL. The CIPP model for evaluation. In: Stufflebeam DL, Madaus GF, Kellaghan T, eds. Evaluation Models. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000;279-318.