Pathways to interdisciplinarity: A technical report exploring collaborative interdisciplinary working in the Transition Pathways consortium

Working Paper - Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment

Volumn , Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-46

  Hargreaves, Tom ^a   Burgess, Jacquelin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE; ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FUTURE PROSPECT; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; THEORETICAL STUDY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 78649558636     PISSN: 09678875     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. BARRY, A., BORN, G. & WESKALNYS, G. (2008) Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society 13, 20-49.
2. BARRY, J. & PROOPS, J. (1999) Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecological Economics 28, 337-345.
3. BORGATTI, S. P. (2002) Netdraw Network Visualization. Harvard, MA, Analytic Technologies.
4. BRACKEN, L. J. & OUGHTON, E. A. (2006) What do you mean? The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 371-382.
5. BROWN, S. R. (1993) A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16, 91-138.
6. BROWN, S. R. (1996) Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 6, 561-567.
7. CHARMAZ, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis London, SAGE Publications.
8. DTI (Department for Trade and Industry) (2003) Our Energy Future - Creating a low carbon economy: Energy White Paper. Online at: www.berr. gov.uk/files/file10719.pdf
9. DTI (Department for Trade and Industry) (2006) The Energy Challenge Energy Review Report 2006. IN (DTI), D. O. T. A. I. (Ed., Stationery Office. Online at: www.berr.gov.uk/energy/review/page31995.html
10. DTI (Department for Trade and Industry) (2007) Meeting the Energy Challenge: A White Paper on Energy. Online at: www.berr.gov.uk/files/file25079. pdf
11. EDEN, S., DONALDSON, A. & WALKER, G. (2005) Structuring Subjectivities: Using Q methodology in human geography. Area 37, 413-422.
12. ELDERS, I., AULT, G., GALLOWAY, S., MCDONALD, J., KOHLER, J., LEACH, M. & LAMPADITOU, E. (2006) Electricity Network Scenarios for Great Britain in 2050. Supergen Future Network Technologies Working Paper.
13. ELZEN, B., GEELS, F. W. & GREEN, K. (Eds.) (2004) System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
14. FOXON, T. J., HAMMOND, G. P., PEARSON, P. J., BURGESS, J. & HARGREAVES, T. (2009) Transition pathways for a UK low carbon energy system: exploring different governance patterns. 1st European Conference on Sustainability Transitions. Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4-5 June 2009.
15. GEELS, F. (2002) Understanding the dynamics of technological transitions: a coevolutionary and socio-technical analysis Enschede, The Netherlands, Twente University Press.
16. GEELS, F. (2005) Technological Transitions and System Transitions, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
17. GEELS, F. & SCHOT, J. (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36, 399-417.
18. HM GOVERNMENT (2009) The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan: National Strategy for Climate and Energy. London, The Stationery Office.
19. HANNEMAN, R. A. & RIDDLE, M. (2005) Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, California, University of California, Riverside.
20. HORLICK-JONES, T. & SIME, J. (2004) Living on the border: Knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures 36, 441-456.
21. HUGHES, N. (2009) Using scenarios to bring about transtions: lessons from transitions theory and the scenario building tradition. Kings College, London.
22. HUGHES, N., MERS, J. & STRACHAN, N. (2009) Review and analysis of UK and International Low Carbon Energy Scenarios. UKERC Working Papers UKERC/WP/ESM/2009/012
23. KEMP, R. & ROTMANS, J. (2004) Managing the transition to sustainable mobility. IN ELZEN, B., GEELS, F. & GREEN, K. (Eds.) System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Camberley, UK, Edward Elgar Publishers.
24. LAWRENCE, R. L. & DESPRÉS, C. (2004) Futures of Transdisciplinarity. Futures 36, 397-405.
25. LINGARD, L., SCHRYER, C. F., SPAFFORD, M. M. & CAMPBELL, S. L. (2007) Negotiating the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary research team. Qualitative Research, 7, 501-519.
26. LOWE, P. & PHILLIPSON, J. (2006) Reflexive Interdisciplinary Research: The making of a research programme on the rural economy and land use. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 165-184.
27. MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS (The Netherlands) (2004) Innovation in Energy Policy - Energy Transitions: State of Affairs and Way Ahead. Onlineat: www.energietransitie.nl.
28. NOWOTNY, H., SCOTT, P. & GIBBONS, M. (2001) Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty Cambridge, Polity Press.
29. NYE, M., WHITMARSH, L. & FOXON, T. (Forthcoming) Socio-psychological perspectives on the active roles of domestic actors in transition to a lower carbon electricity economy. Environment and Planning A.
30. OWENS, S., PETTS, J. & BULKELEY, H. (2006) Boundary work: knowledge, policy and the urban environment. Environment and Planning C, 24, 633-643.
31. RCEP (2000) Energy: The changing climate. Twenty-second report. London, HMSO.
32. RIP, A. & KEMP, R. (1998) Technological Change. IN RAYNER, S. & MALONE, E. S. (Eds.) Human Choices and Climate Change (Volume 2). Columbus, Ohio, Battelle Press.
33. RITTEL, H. W. J. & WEBBER, M. M. (1973) Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4, 155-169.
34. SHACKLEY, S. & GREEN, K. (2005) A conceptual framework for exploring transitions to decarbonised energy systems in the UK. Energy 32, 221-236.
35. SHOVE, E. (1998) Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: Theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings. Energy Policy 26, 1105-1112.
36. SMITH, A. & KERN, F. (2009) The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy. Environmental Politics 18, 78-98.
37. SMITH, A., STIRLING, A. & BERKHOUT, F. (2005) The governance of sustainable sociotechnical transitions. Research Policy 34, 1491-1510.
38. STAINTON-ROGERS, R. & STAINTON-ROGERS, W. (1990) What the Brits got out of the Q: and why their work may not line up with the American way of getting into it! The European Journal of Communication, 1, No pagination.
39. STRACHAN, N., KANNAN, R. & PYE, S. (2007) Scenarios and Sensitivities in Long Term UK Carbon Reductions using the UK MARKAL and MARKAL- Macro Energy System Models. UK Energy Research Centre Research Report 2. Online at: www.ukerc.ac.uk.
40. STRATHERN, M. (2004) Laudable aims and problematic consequences, or: The 'flow' of knowledge is not neutral. Economy and Society, 33, 550-561.
41. STRAUSS, A. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge, CUP.
42. THOMPSON KLEIN, J. (2004) Prospects for Transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36, 515-526.
43. TURNPENNY, J., LORENZONI, I. & JONES, M. (2009) Noisy and definitely not normal: responding to wicked issues in the environment, energy and health. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 347-358.
44. UKERC (2009) Making the Transition to a Secure and Low-Carbon Energy System: Synthesis Report. London, UK Energy Research Centre.
45. VERBONG, G. & GEELS, F. (2007) The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004). Energy Policy, 35, 1025-1037.
46. WATTS, S. & STENNER, P. (2005) Doing Q Methodology: Theory, Method and Interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2, 67-91.
47. WEBLER, T., DANIELSON, S. & TULER, S. (2007) Guidance on the use of Q method for evaluation of public involvement programs at contaminated sites. Greenfield, MA, Social and Environmental Research Institute.
48. WESKALNYS, G. (2006) Mapping Interdisciplinarity: Report of the survey element of the project 'Interdisciplinarity and Society: A critical comparative study' (ESRC Science in Society, 2004-06). Online at: http://www.ouce.ox.ac.uk/ research/technologies/proj ects/mappinginterdiscipli narity.
49. WICKSON, F., CAREW, A. L. & RUSSELL, A. W. (2006) Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 38, 1046-1059.