Optimization of a highly standardized carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester flow cytometry panel and gating strategy design using discriminative information measure evaluation

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 77 A, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1126-1136

  Chan, Cliburn ^a   Lin, Lin ^b   Frelinger, Jacob ^c   Hérbert, Valérie ^d   Gagnon, Dominic ^d   Landry, Claire ^d   Sékaly, Rafick Pierre ^d   Enzor, Jennifer ^a   Staats, Janet ^a   Weinhold, Kent J ^a   Jaimes, Maria ^e   West, Mike ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^e BD BIOSCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

CFSE standardization; Discriminative Information Measure Evaluation (DIME); Gating strategy optimization; Mixture model; Panel design

Indexed keywords

5 (6) CARBOXYFLUORESCEIN DIACETATE SUCCINIMIDYL ESTER; 5-(6)-CARBOXYFLUORESCEIN DIACETATE SUCCINIMIDYL ESTER; FLUORESCEIN DERIVATIVE; SUCCINIMIDE DERIVATIVE;

CANADA; CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CD8+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CYTOLOGY; EVALUATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PILOT STUDY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

CANADA; CD4-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CD8-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL PROLIFERATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCEINS; HUMANS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PILOT PROJECTS; SUCCINIMIDES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78649556232     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20987     Document Type: Letter

References (29)

1. Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Roederer M. Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: Unravelling the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2004; 4: 648-55.
2. Maecker HT, Rinfret A, D'Souza P, Darden J, Roig E, Landry C, Hayes P, Birungi J, Anzala O, Garcia M, Harari A, Frank I, Baydo R, Baker M, Holbrook J, Ottinger J, Lamoreaux L, Epling CL, Sinclair E, Suni MA, Punt K, Calarota S, El-Bahi S, Alter G, Maila H, Kuta E, Cox J, Gray C, Altfeld M, Nougarede N, Boyer J, Tussey L, Tobery T, Bredt B, Roederer M, Koup R, Maino VC, Weinhold K, Pantaleo G, Gilmour J, Horton H, Sekaly RP. Standardization of cytokine flow cytometry assays. BMC Immunol 2005; 6: 13.
3. Schenker EL, Hultin LE, Bauer KD, Ferbas J, Margolick JB, Giorgi JV. Evaluation of a dual-color flow cytometry immunophenotyping panel in a multicenter quality assurance program. Cytometry 1993; 14: 307-317.
4. Nicholson J, Kidd P, Mandy F, Livnat D, Kagan J. Three-color supplement to the NIAID DAIDS guideline for flow cytometric immunophenotyping. Cytometry-Commun Clin Cytometry 1996; 26: 227-230.
5. Schnizlein-Bick CT, Mandy FF, O'Gorman MR, Paxton H, Nicholson JK, Hultin LE, Gelman RS, Wilkening CL, Livnat D. Use of CD45 gating in three and four-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping: guideline from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS. Cytometry 2002; 50: 46-52.
6. Schnizlein-Bick CT, Spritzler J, Wilkening CL, Nicholson JK, O'Gorman MR. Evaluation of TruCount absolute-count tubes for determining CD4 and CD8 cell numbers in human immunodeficiency virus-positive adults. Site Investigators and The NIAID DAIDS New Technologies Evaluation Group. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2000; 7: 336-343; PMCID: 95876.
7. Reimann KA, O'Gorman MR, Spritzler J, Wilkening CL, Sabath DE, Helm K, Campbell DE. Multisite comparison of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte counting by single- versus multiple-platform methodologies: Evaluation of Beckman Coulter flow-count fluorospheres and the tetraONE system. The NIAID DAIDS New Technologies Evaluation Group. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2000; 7: 344-351; PMCID: 95877.
8. Denny TN, Gelman R, Bergeron M, Landay A, Lam L, Louzao R, Mandy FF, Schmitz J, Spira T, Wilkening C, Glencross DK. A North American multilaboratory study of CD4 counts using flow cytometric panLeukogating (PLG): A NIAID-DAIDS immunology quality assessment program study. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2008; 74B [Suppl 1]: S52-S64.
9. Sarzotti-Kelsoe M, Cox J, Cleland N, Denny T, Hural J, Needham L, Ozaki D, Rodriguez-Chavez IR, Stevens G, Stiles T, Tarragona-Fiol T, Simkins A. Evaluation and recommendations on good clinical laboratory practice guidelines for phase I-III clinical trials. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000067.
10. Ezzelle J, Rodriguez-Chavez IR, Darden JM, Stirewalt M, Kunwar N, Hitchcock R, Walter T, D'Souza MP. Guidelines on good clinical laboratory practice: Bridging operations between research and clinical research laboratories. J Pharmaceut Biomed 2008; 46: 18-29.
11. Stiles T, Grant V, Mawbey T. Good clinical laboratory practice (GCLP). A quality system for laboratories that undertake the analyses of samples from clinical trials. Ipswich, UK: British Association of Research Quality Assurance 117. 2003; ISBN 1-904610-00-5.
12. Mahnke YD, Roederer M. Optimizing a multicolor immunophenotyping assay. Clin Lab Med 2007; 27: 469-85.
13. Owens M, Vall H, Hurley A, Wormsley S. Validation and quality control of immunophenotyping in clinical flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 2000; 243: 33-50.
14. McLaughlin BE, Baumgarth N, Bigos M, Roederer M, De Rosa SC, Altman JD, Nixon DF, Ottinger J, Li J, Beckett L, Shacklett BL, Evans TG, Asmuth DM. Nine-color flow cytometry for accurate measurement of T cell subsets and cytokine responses. Part II: Panel performance across different instrument platforms. Cytometry A 2008; 73A: 411-420.
15. McLaughlin BE, Baumgarth N, Bigos M, Roederer M, De Rosa SC, Altman JD, Nixon DF, Ottinger J, Oxford C, Evans TG, Asmuth DM. Nine-color flow cytometry for accurate measurement of T cell subsets and cytokine responses. Part I: Panel design by an empiric approach. Cytometry A 2008; 73A: 400-410.
16. Maecker HT. Multiparameter flow cytometry monitoring of T cell responses. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 485: 375-391.
17. Britten CM, Janetzki S, Ben-Porat L, Clay TM, Kalos M, Maecker H, Odunsi K, Pride M, Old L, Hoos A, Romero P. Harmonization guidelines for HLA-peptide multimer assays derived from results of a large scale international proficiency panel of the Cancer Vaccine Consortium. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2009; 58: 1701-1713; PMCID: 2714899.
18. Roederer M. Spectral compensation for flow cytometry: Visualization artifacts, limitations, and caveats. Cytometry 2001; 45: 194-205.
19. Roederer M. How many events is enough? Are you positive? Cytometry A 2008; 73A: 384-385.
20. Perfetto SP, Ambrozak D, Nguyen R, Chattopadhyay P, Roederer M. Quality assurance for polychromatic flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2006; 1: 1522-1530.
21. Van Craenenbroeck EMF, Conraads VMA, Van Bockstaele DR, Haine SE, Vermeulen K, Van Tendeloo VF, Vrints CJ, Hoymans VY. Quantification of circulating endothelial progenitor cells: a methodological comparison of six flow cytometric approaches. J Immunol Methods 2008; 332: 31-40.
22. Loken MR, Brosnan JM, Bach BA, Ault KA. Establishing optimal lymphocyte gates for immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1990; 11: 453-459.
23. Chan C, Feng F, Ottinger J, Foster D, West M, Kepler TB. Statistical mixture modeling for cell subtype identification in flow cytometry. Cytometry A 2008; 73A: 693-701; PMCID: 2840702.
24. Boedigheimer MJ, Ferbas J. Mixture modeling approach to flow cytometry data. Cytometry A 2008; 73A: 421-429.
25. Pyne S, Hu X, Wang K, Rossin E, Lin TI, Maier LM, Baecher-Allan C, McLachlan GJ, Tamayo P, Hafler DA, De Jager PL, Mesirov JP. Automated high-dimensional flow cytometric data analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 8519-8524; PMCID: 2682540.
26. Lo K, Brinkman RR, Gottardo R. Automated gating of flow cytometry data via robust model-based clustering. Cytometry A 2008; 73A: 321-332.
27. Landry C JM, Ottinger J, Gagnon D, Enzor J, Hebert V, Sparks S, Yassine-Diab B, Sekaly RP, D'Souza P. editor. Efforts toward validation of a standardized CFSE proliferation assay through inter-laboratory precision and robustness evaluation. CMI Standardization Techniques in Evaluation of Vaccine Response; 2008; Annecy, France.
28. Escobar MD, West M. Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures. JAm Stat Assoc 1995; 90: 577-588.
29. Ishwaran H, James LF. Approximate Dirichlet Process computing in finite normal mixtures. J Comput Graph Stat 2002; 11: 508-532.