Assessing quality of data standards: Framework and illustration using XBRL GAAP taxonomy

Communications in Computer and Information Science

Volumn 108 CCIS, Issue , 2010, Pages 288-299

  Zhu, Hongwei ^a   Wu, Harris ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

data quality; data standards; GAAP taxonomy; XBRL

Indexed keywords

DATA QUALITY; DATA STANDARDS; FINANCIAL DATA; FINANCIAL SECTORS; GAAP TAXONOMY; GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES; HIGH COSTS; LISTED COMPANIES; QUALITY OF DATA; SCHEMAS; SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS; XBRL;

DATA REDUCTION; INTEROPERABILITY; METADATA; STANDARDIZATION; TAXONOMIES;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 78649549475     PISSN: 18650929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16552-8_26     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Rosenthal, A., Seligman, L., Renner, S.: From Semantic Integration to Semantics Management: Case Studies and a Way Forward. ACM SIGMOD Record 33, 44-50 (2004)
2. Markus, M. L., Steinfield, C. W., Wigand, R. T., Minton, G.: Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U. S. Residential Mortage Industry. MIS Quarterly 30, 439-465 (2006)
3. Wang, R., Strong, D.: Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 12, 5-33 (1996)
4. XBRL International: Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) 2.1. XBRL International (2006)
5. Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., Wang, R. Y.: AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment. Information and Management 30, 133-146 (2002)
6. Redman, T. C.: Data Quality for the Information Age. Artech House, Boston (1996)
7. van Rijsbergen, C. V.: Information Retrieval. Butterworth, London (1979)
8. Bovee, M., Ettredge, M. L., Srivastava, R. P., Vasarhelyi, M. A.: Does the Year 2000 XBRL Taxonomy Accommodate Current Business Financial-Reporting Practice? Journal of Information Systems 16, 165-182 (2002)
9. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P. A.: A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching. VLDB Journal 10, 334-350 (2001)
10. Rahm, E., Do, H.-H., Maßmann, S.: Matching Large XML Schemas. ACM SIGMOD Record 33, 26-31 (2004)
11. Hahsler, M., Grun, B., Hornik, K., Buchta, C.: Introduction to arules - A computational environment for mining association rules and frequent item sets (2010)
12. Roohani, S., Zhao, X.: XBRL Citation Analysis: A Decade of Progress and Puzzle. In: International Conference on XBRL, Lawrence, Kansas, USA (2009)
13. Bartley, J. W., Chen, Y. A., Taylor, E. Z.: A Comparison of XBRL Filings to Corporate 10-Ks - Evidence from the Voluntary Filing Program. SSRN (2010)
14. Boritz, E. J., No, W. G.: SEC's XBRL Voluntary Program on Edgar: The Case for Quality Assurance SSRN (2008), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1163254
15. Boritz, E. J., No, W. G.: Auditing an XBRL Instance Document: The Case of United Technologies Corporation. University of Waterloo, Waterloo (2008)
16. Chou, K. H.: How Valid Are They? An Examination of XBRL Voluntary Filing Dcoments with the SEC EDGAR System. In: The 14th International XBRL Conference, Philadelphia, USA (2006)
17. Bovee, M., Kogan, A., Nelson, K., Srivastava, R. P., Vasarhelyi, M. A.: Financial Reporting and Auditing Agent with Net Knowledge (FRAANK) and eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL). Journal of Information Systems 19, 19-41 (2005)
18. Zhu, H., Fu, L.: Towards Quality of Data Standards: Empirical Findings from XBRL. In: The 30th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2009), Phoenix, AZ, USA (2009)
19. Zhu, H., Wu, H.: Quality of XBRL US GAAP Taxonomy: Empirical Evaluation using SEC Filings. In: American Conference of Information Systems. Quality of XBRL US GAAP Taxonomy: Empirical Evaluation using SEC Filings (2010)
20. Madnick, S. E., Wang, R. Y., Lee, Y. W., Zhu, H.: Overview and Framework for Data and Information Quality Research. ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality, Article 2, 1(2009)
21. Tambouris, E., Manouselis, N., Costopoulou, C.: Metadata for digital collections of e-government resources. Electronic Library 25(2), 176-192 (2007)