The contribution of advisory committees and public involvement to large studies: Case study

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Slade, Mike ^a   Bird, Victoria ^a   Chandler, Ruth ^b   Fox, Jo ^c   Larsen, John ^d   Tew, Jerry ^e   Leamy, Mary ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SUSSEX PARTNERSHIP NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d Rethink   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PLANNING GUIDELINES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES;

EID: 78649531873     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-323     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Department of Health, Department, Best Research for Best Health London: Department of Health 2007
2. Medical Research Council, MRC Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials London: MRC 1998
3. Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials (the DAMOCLES study). AM Grant M Sydes S McLeer F Clemens D Altman A Babiker M Campbell J Darbyshire D Elbourne M Parmar, et al. Health Technology Assessment 2005 9 15763038
4. K Staley, Exploring Impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research Eastleigh: NIHR INVOLVE 2009
5. R Barber, Can the impact of public involvement on health and social research be evaluated? An international Delphi study Sheffield: University of Sheffield 2008
6. M Slade, Personal recovery and mental illness. A guide for mental health professionals Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009
7. Mental illness and well-being: the central importance of positive psychology and recovery approaches. M Slade, BMC Health Services Research 2010 26
8. Mind, Life and times of a supermodel. The recovery paradigm for mental health London: Mind 2008
9. Mental Health "Recovery" Study Working Group, Mental Health "Recovery": Users and Refusers Toronto: Wellesley Institute 2009
10. Closing the gap between research and practice. J Geddes P Harrison, British Journal of Psychiatry 1997 171 220 225 10.1192/bjp.171.3.220 9337970
11. Involving young service users as co-researchers: Possibilities, benefits and costs. H McLaughlin, British Journal of Social Work 2006 36 1395 1410 10.1093/bjsw/bch420 (Pubitemid 44906078)
12. Challenges and strategies in collaborative working with service user researchers: Reflections from the academic researcher. E Miller A Cook H Alexander S Cooper G Hubbard J Morrison A Petch, Research Policy and Planning 2006 24 197 208
13. C Paterson, Consumer involvement in research into complementary and alternative therapies Bristol: MRC Health Services Research Collaboration 2003
14. Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits. S Hewlett M Wit P Richards E Quest R Hughes T Heiberg J Kirwan, Arthritis and Rheumatism 2006 55 676 680 10.1002/art.22091 16874772
15. A Faulkner, Beyond our expectations: A report of the experiences of involving service users in forensic mental health research London: National Programme on Forensic Mental Health R&D 2006
16. Recovery, psychosis and psychiatry: research is better than rhetoric. M Slade M Hayward, Acta Psychiatr Scand 2007 116 81 83 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007. 01047.x 17650268
17. Involving patients as advisors in pharmacy practice research: What are the benefits? J Sutton M Weiss, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2008 16 231 238 10.1211/ijpp.16.4.0005 (Pubitemid 352019079)
18. L Bryant JJ Beckett, The practicality and acceptability of an advocacy service in the emergency department for people attending following self-harm Leeds: University of Leeds 2006
19. From passive subjects to equal partners: Qualitative review of user involvement in research. T Wykes P Trivedi, British Journal of Psychiatry 2002 181 468 472 10.1192/bjp.181.6.468 12456515
20. Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: An example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda. D Wright J Corner J Hopkinson C Foster, Health Expectations 2006 9 3 12 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00353.x 16436157
21. H Parr, Carers and supporting recovery Glasgow: Scottish Recovery Network 2009
22. A Sweeney P Beresford A Faulkner M Nettle D Rose (eds), This Is Survivor Research Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books 2009
23. Are randomised controlled trials the only gold that glitters? M Slade S Priebe, Br J Psychiatry 2001 179 286 287 10.1192/bjp.179.4.286 11581106
24. P Ten Have, Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide London: Sage 1999
25. A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups. B Gardner R Davidson J McAteer S Michie the "Evidence into Recommendations: study group, Implementation Science 2009 4 48 10.1186/1748-5908-4-48 19656366
26. Service users' experiences of residential alternatives to standard acute wards: qualitative study of similarities and differences. H Gilburt M Slade D Rose B Lloyd-Evans S Johnson D Osborn, British Journal of Psychiatry 2010 197 26 s31 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.081075
27. The importance of relationships in mental health care: a qualitative study of service users' experiences of psychiatric hospital admission in the UK. H Gilburt D Rose M Slade, BMC Health Serv Res 2008 8 92 10.1186/1472-6963-8-92 18439254
28. What outcomes to measure in routine mental health services, and how to assess them: a systematic review. M Slade, Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2002 36 743 753 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01099.x 12406116
29. Implementation science: understanding the translation of evidence into practice. M Tansella G Thornicroft, British Journal of Psychiatry 2009
30. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus approach. S Michie M Johnston C Abraham R Lawton D Parker A Walker, Quality and Safety in Health Care 2005 14 26 33 10.1136/qshc.2004. 011155 15692000
31. Difficulties implementing a mental health guideline: an exploratory investigation using psychological theory. S Michie S Pilling P Garety P Whitty M Eccles M Johnston J Simmons, Implementation Science 2007 2 8 10.1186/1748-5908-2-8 17386102