The structure of postconcussive symptoms in 3 us military samples

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 447-458

  Caplan, Leslie J ^a   Ivins, Brian ^b   Poole, John H ^c   Vanderploeg, Rodney D ^d   Jaffee, Michael S ^b   Schwab, Karen ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center   (United States)

^c VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

concussion; neuropsychology; postconcussive symptoms; traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ARMY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE FIT INDEX; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMUM AVERAGE PARTIAL TEST; NEUROBEHAVIORAL SYMPTOM INVENTORY; PARALLEL ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT; POSTCONCUSSION SYNDROME; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR OF APPROXIMATION; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

EID: 78649526965     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181d5bdbd     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alves W, Macciocchi SN, Barth JT. Postconcussive symptoms after uncomplicated head injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:48-59.
2. Sawchyn JM, Brulot MM, Strauss E. Note on the use of the postconcussion syndrome checklist. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2000;15:1-8.
3. Szymanski HV, Linn R. A review of the postconcussion syndrome. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1992;22:357-375.
4. Gunstad J, Suhr JA. Use of the abbreviated Portland Digit Recognition Test in simulated malingering and neurological groups. J Forensic Neuropsychol. 2004;4:33-47.
5. Iverson GL, Lange RT. Examination of "postconcussion-like" symptoms in a healthy sample. Appl Neuropsychol. 2003;10:137-144.
6. Margulies S. The postconcussion syndrome after mild head trauma: is brain damage overdiagnosed? Part 1. J Clin Neurosci. 2000;7:400-408.
7. Tiersky LA, Cicerone KD, Natelson BH, DeLuca J. Neuropsycho-logical functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome and mild traumatic brain injury: a comparison. Clin Neuropsychol. 1998;12:503-512.
8. Axelrod BN, Fox DD, Lees-Haley PR, Earnest K, Dolezal-Wood S, Goldman RS. Latent structure of the postconcussion syndrome questionnaire. Psychol Assess. 1996;8:422-427.
9. Wrightson P, Gronwall D. Time off work and symptoms after minor head injury. Injury. 1981;12:445-454.
10. Potter S, Leigh E, Wade D, Fleminger S. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a confirmatory factor analysis. J Neurol. 2006;253(12):1603-1614.
11. Levin HS, Gary HE, High WM, et al. Minor head injury and the postconcussional syndrome: methodological issues in outcome studies. In: Levin HS, Grafman J, Eisenberg HM, eds. Neurobehav-ioral Recovery From Head Injury. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1987:262-275.
12. Cicerone KD, Kalmar K. Persistent postconcussion syndrome: the structure of subjective complaints after mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10:1-17.
13. Ivins BJ, Schwab KA, Warden D, et al. Traumatic brain injury in U.S. Army paratroopers: prevalence and character. J Trauma. 2003;55:617-621.
14. Locke SE, Kowaloff HB, Hollis B, et al. Computer-based interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV transmission. JAMA. 1992;268:1301-1305.
15. Navaline HA, Snider EC, Petro CJ, et al. An automated version of the Risk Assessment Battery (RAB): enhancing the assessment of risk behaviors. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1994;10(suppl 2):281-283.
16. O'Reilly J, Hubbard ML, Lessler JT, Biemer PP, Turner CF. Audio and video computer assisted self-interviewing: preliminary tests of new technologies for data collection. J Off Stat. 1994;10:197-214.
17. Wilson RF, Genco KT, Yager GG. Assessing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil vs. computerized tests: demonstration of a promising methodology. Comput Hum Behav. 1985;1:265-275.
18. Erdman HP, Klein MH, Greist JH, et al. A comparison of two computer-administered versions of the NIMH diagnostic interview schedule. J Psychiatr Res. 1992;26:85-95.
19. Lucas RW, Mullin PJ, Luna CB, McInroy DC. Psychiatrists and a computer as interrogators of patients with alcohol-related illnesses: a comparison. Br J Psychiatry. 1977;131:160-167.
20. Millstein SG. Acceptability and reliability of sensitive information collected via computer interview. Educ Psychol Meas. 1987;47:523-533.
21. Fife D. Head injury with and without hospital admission: comparisons of incidence and short-term disability. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:810-812.
22. Ferguson RJ, Mittenberg W, Barone DF, Schneider B. Postconcus-sion syndrome following sports-related head injury: expectation as etiology. Neuropsychology. 1999;13:582-589.
23. O'Connor BP. SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000;32:396-402.
24. Velicer WF, Eaton CA, Fava JL. Construct explication through factor or component analysis: a review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In: Goffin RD, Helmes E, eds. Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment. Boston, MA: Kluwer; 2000:41-71.
25. Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965;30:179-185.
26. Browne W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KW, Long S, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993:126-162.
27. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998-2004.
28. Gerber DJ, Schraa JC. Mild traumatic brain injury: searching for the syndrome. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10:28-40.
29. Benge JF, Pastorek NJ, Thornton GM. Postconcussive symptoms in OEF-OIF Veterans: factor structure and impact of posttrau-matic stress. Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54(3):270-278.