Diffusion and use of electronic health record systems in Norway

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 160, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages 381-385

  Heimly, Vigdis ^a   Grimsmo, Anders ^a   Henningsen, Trond Palmer ^a   Faxvaag, Arild ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Benefits; Diffusion; Electronic health record; Shared care; Strategy; Survey

Indexed keywords

EHEALTH; HOSPITALS; RECORDS MANAGEMENT; SURVEYING; SURVEYS;

BENEFITS; DIFFUSION PROCESS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD SYSTEMS; NATIONAL STRATEGIES; SHARED CARE; STRATEGY; USER INVOLVEMENT;

DIFFUSION;

EID: 78649525504     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-588-4-381     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Lærum H, Ellingsen G, Faxvaag A, Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey, BMJ 2001;323:1344-1348 (8 December)
2. Ellingsen G, Monteiro E. "Big is beautiful: electronic patient records in large hospitals in Norway 1980s-2000", International Conference on IT in Healthcare, September 2001, Rotterdam, Netherlands
3. Christensen T., Bringing the GP to the forefront of EHR-development, PhD-thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2009
4. Castro C., Explaining international IT application leadership, Health IT, The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, September 2009
5. Protti D, Nilsson G. Comparison of Information Technology in General Practice in 10 Countries, Healthcare Quarterly, Vol 5, No. 4, 2007:110.
6. Nøhr C et al. Developmen, implementation and diffusion of EHR systems in Denmark, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 754, 2005:229-234
7. Nøhr C, Andersen SK, Bernstein K. Bruun-Rasmussen M., Vingtoft S. Diffusion of Electronic Health Record, - Six Years of Empirical Data, Studies in Health Technology and Infomatic, Volume 129, 2007:963-967
8. Gans D, Kralewski J, Hammons T, Dowd B, Groups' Adoption Of Electronic Health Records And Information Systems, Health Affairs, 24, no. 5, 2005:1323-1333
9. Stroetmann KA, Jones T. Dobrev A, Stroetmann VN, eHealth is worth it - The economic benefits of implemented eHealth solutions at ten European sites, Luxemburg: European Commission; 2006
10. Bower AG. The diffusion and Value of Healthcare Information technology, Adoption rate of electronic health records consistent with similar IT in other industries, The Cerner Quarterly, Q3, 2005:16-27
11. Bassøe C-F, Sørlie WG. EDB i allmennpraksis, Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, 1983;103; 1270-1274
12. Hasvold T. A computerized medical record, The Balsfjord system, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Care, 1984, Sep: 2 (3):125-8.
13. Nilsen JF, Fosse S. A computerized medical record system for primary health care. Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, 1982;102; 1285-1288
14. Meyer I., Dobrev A., Haesner M., Hüsing T, Korte WB. m Benchmarking ICT-use among General Practitoners in Europe, Bonn: European Commision, Information Society and Media Directorate General: 2008
15. Lium JT, Tjora A, Faxvaag A. No paper, but the same routines, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008, 8:2 doi:10.1186/1472-6947-8-2
16. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems. A systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success, BMJ 2005, April 2:330(7494):795
17. Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamlyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review, J Am Med inform Assoc. 2005, Sep-Oct: 12 (5):505-516