Verification & validation of the knowledge base for the hypertension management CDSS

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 160, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages 1140-1144

  Kim, Hyun Young ^a   Kim, Ji Hyun ^b   Cho, Insook ^c   Lee, Jae Ho ^d   Kim, Yoon ^e  

^a Eulji University   (South Korea)

^b R and D Center for Interoperable EHR   (South Korea)

^c Inha University   (South Korea)

^d Asan Medical Center   (South Korea)

^e Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Clinical Decision Support; Hypertension Management; Knowledge base; Validation; Verification

Indexed keywords

ENGINES; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VERIFICATION;

CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; KNOWLEDGE BASE; KNOWLEDGE BASED; KNOWLEDGE ENGINES; TESTING PROCESS; VALIDATION;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 78649523452     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-588-4-1140     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Peleg M. Guidelines and workflow models. In R. A. Greenes (Ed.). Clinical decision support; The road ahead: Academic Press, 2007; pp. 281-306.
2. Tu SW, Campbell JC, Glasgow J, Nyman MA, McClure R, McClay J, Parker C, Hrabak KM, Berc D, Weida T, Mansfield JG, Musen MA, Anarbanel RM. The SAGE Guideline Model: Achievements and Overview, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2007;14(5):589-598.
3. Tu SW, Musen MA. Representation Formalisms and computational methods for modeling guideline-based patient care. Proc of the First European Workshop on Computerbased Support for Clinical Guidelines and Protocols, Leipzig, Germany, 2000; pp. 125-142.
4. Kim JA, Cho I, Kim Y. Knowledge Translation of SAGE-based guidelines for executing with knowledge engine. Proc AMIA Symp. 2008;1008.
5. Cho I, Kim JH, Lee EJ, Kim SY, Lee JH, Kim Y. Approach to the requirements of a decision support system for hypertension management in a health center. J Kor Soc Med Informatics 2007;13(3):259-269.
6. Kim JA, Shim BG, Kim ST, Lee JH, Cho I, Kim Y. Translation Protégé knowledge for executing clinical guidelines. http://pretege.stanford.edu/conference/2009/schedule.html. 2009.
7. Tierney Wm, Overhage JM, Takesue BY, Harris LE, Murray MD, Vargo DL, McDonald CJ. Computerizing guidelines to improve care and patient outcomes: the example of heart failure. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995:2; 316-322.
8. Sailors RM, East TD, Wallace DJ, Carlson DA, Franklin MA, Heermann LK, Kinder AT, Bradshaw RL, Randolph AG, Morris AH. Testing and validation of computerized decision support systems. Proc AMIA Symp. Washington, DC. 1996:234-238.
9. Martins SB, Lai S, Tu S, Shankar R, Hastings SN, Hoffman BB, Di Pilla N, Goldstein MK. Offline testing of the ATHENA Hypertension decision support systems knowledge base to improve the accuracy of recommendations. Proc AMIA Symp. 2006:539.
10. Preece A. Evaluating verification and validation methods in knowledge engineering. In R. Roy (ed.), Micro-Level Knowledge Management, Morgan-Kaufman, 2001: pp. 123-145.
11. The Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, JNC7. National Institutes of Health; 2004.
12. Goldstein MK, Coleman RW, Tu SW, Shankar RD, O'Connor MJ, Musen MA, Martins SB, Lavori PW, Shlipak MG, Oddone E, Advani AA, Gholami p, Hoffman BB. Translating research into practice: organizational issues in implementing automated decision support for hypertension in three medical centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2004;11(5):368-376.
13. Duftschmid G, Miksch S. Knowledge-based verification of clinical guidelines by detection of anomalies. Artif Intell Med 2001;22:23-41.
14. Choi J, Bakken S. Creation of a gold standard for validation of a computer-interpretable depression screening guideline. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:95-99.