Participatory interaction design in user requirements specification in healthcare

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 160, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages 304-308

  Martikainen, Susanna ^a   Ikävalko, Pauliina ^b   Korpela, Mikko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Interaction design; Medicinal care; Participatory design; Usability; User interface design; User requirements

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; HOSPITALS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; INTERFACE STATES; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; SOFTWARE DESIGN; USABILITY ENGINEERING; USER CENTERED DESIGN;

INTERACTION DESIGN; MEDICINAL CARE; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; USABILITY; USER INTERFACE DESIGNS; USER REQUIREMENTS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 78649519710     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-588-4-304     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Lääveri, T. Potilaskertomusjärjestelmien käytettävyysselvitys osoitti: Lääkärien mielipiteitä ei ole kuunneltu [Usability report on patient record systems showed: Doctors' opinions have not been listened to. In Finnish]. Finnish Medical Journal 2008:6:3.
2. Lääveri, T. Potilaskertomusjärjestelmien arvioinnit [Evaluations of patient record systems. In Finnish]. Finnish Medical Journal 2008:6:8-31.
3. Vainionmäki, S., Kuusela, M., Vainionmäki, P., and Rautava, P. The quality of electronic patient records in Finnish primary health care needs to be improved. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008:26:117-22.
4. Smelcer, J. B., Miller-Jacobs, H., and Kantrovich, L. Usability of Electronic Medical Records. Journal of Usability Studies 2009:2:70-84.
5. ISO standard 9241.
6. Bødker, K., Kensing, F., and Simonsen, J. Participatory IT design. MIT Press, 2004.
7. IXDA. http://www.ixda.org/Accessed 15.10.2009.
8. Viitanen, J. A User-centred Approach to Healthcare ICT Development. Licentiate's Thesis. Helsinki University of Technology, 2009.
9. Thursky, K. A., and Mahemoff, M. User-centered design techniques for computerized antibiotic decision support system in an intensive care unit. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007:76:760-768.
10. Krushniruk, A. W., and Borycki, E. M. Low-Cost Usability Engineering. Electronic Healthcare 2006:2:98-102.
11. Cross, N. Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer, 2006.
12. Korpela, M., Mursu, A., Soriyan, A., Eerola, A., Häkkinen, H., and Toivanen, M. I. S. research and development by activity analysis and development: Dead horse or the next wave? In: Kaplan, B., Truex, III D., Wastell D., Wood-Harper, A. T. and DeGross, J. I., eds. Information Systems Research. Relevant Theory and Informed Practice. Kluwer Academic, 2004:453-471.
13. Mursu, A., Luukkonen, I., Toivanen, M., and Korpela, M. Activity theory in information systems research and practice: theoretical underpinnings for an information systems development model. Inf Res 2007:12: paper 311. http://informationr.net/ir/12-3/paper311.html
14. Beyer, H., and Holtzblatt, K. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.
15. Foraker Design. Usability Glossary: artifact analysis. Usability First web site. http://www.usabilityfirst.com/glossary/main. cgi?function=di splay-term&term-id=407. Accessed 15.10.2009.
16. Laakso, S. A., and Laakso, K-P. Ensuring quality of the user interface with the GUIDe process model. University of Helsinki, Dept. of Computer Science. Unpublished. 2004.
17. Sefelin, R., Tscheligi, M., and Gukker, V. Paper Prototyping, What is it good for? CHI 2003:778-779
18. Snyder, C. Paper prototyping. Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
19. Microsoft. Microsoft Health Common User Interface web site. http://www.mscui.net/. Accessed 15.10.2009.