Extraction of adverse drug effects from clinical records

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 160, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages 739-743

  Aramaki, Eiji ^a   Miura, Yasuhide ^b   Tonoike, Masatsugu ^b   Ohkuma, Tomoko ^b   Masuichi, Hiroshi ^b   Waki, Kayo ^c   Ohe, Kazuhiko ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b FUJI XEROX CO LTD   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adverse effect; Drug trial; Natural language processing (NLP); Side effect

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS; ADVERSE EFFECT; ADVERSE EVENTS; CLINICAL RECORDS; DRUG EFFECTS; DRUG TRIAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; SIDE EFFECT;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 78649509581     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-588-4-739     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Lafferty J, McCallum A, and Pereira F. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. Int Conf on Machine Learning 2001:282-289.
2. Vapnik VN. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, 1998.
3. Sha F, and Pereira F. Shallow parsing with conditional random fields. Technical Report CIS TRMS-CIS-02-35, University of Pennsylvania; 2003.
4. Pinto D, McCallum A, Lee X, and Croft W. Table Extraction using Conditional Random Fields. In: Proc. 26th ACM SIGIR, 2003:235-242.
5. McCallum A and Li W. Early Results for Named Entity Recognition with Conditional Random Fields. In: Proc. 7th Conf on Natural Language Learning; 2003:188-191.
6. Aramaki E, Miura Y, Tonoike M, Ohkuma T, Mashuichi H, and Ohe K. TEXT2TABLE: Medical Text Summarization System Based on Named Entity Recognition and Modality Identification, Proc. HLT-NAACL2003 Workshop on BioNLP, 2009:185-192.
7. http://www.meddramsso.com/MSSOWeb/
8. http://www.info.pmda.go.jp/
9. http://biocreative.sourceforge.net/
10. Sekine S and Eriguchi Y, Japanese named entity extraction evaluation: analysis of results. Proc. 18th Conf on Computational Linguistics, 2000:1106-1110.
11. Aramaki E, Imai T, Miyo K and Ohe K. Automatic Deidentification by using Sentence Features and Label Consistency, Workshop on Challenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical Data, 2006.
12. Tawanda S and Ozlem U. Role of Local Context in Automatic Deidentification of Ungrammatical, Fragmented Text. In: Proc. HLT-NAACL 2006;2006:65-73.
13. Grishman R and Sundheim B. Message understanding conference - 6: A brief history. In Proc. Int Conf on Computational Linguistics, 1996:466-471.
14. http://www.itl.nist.gov/iaui/894.01/tests/ace/
15. Girju R, Szpakowicz S, Nakov P, Turney P, Nastase V and Yuret D. SemEval-2007 task 04: Classification of semantic relations between nominals, ACL2007 Workshop on Semantic Evaluations 2007:464-467.