Improving general practice based epidemiologic surveillance using desktop clients: The French Sentinel Network experience

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 160, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages 442-446

  Turbelin, Clément ^a,b   Boëlle, Pierre Yves ^b,c  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c HÔPITAL SAINT ANTOINE   (France)

Author keywords

Communicable diseases; Sentinel surveillance; Software

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; SURVEYS;

CLIENT APPLICATIONS; COMMUNICABLE DISEASE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEILLANCE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; NETWORK EXPERIENCES; QUALITY OF SURVEILLANCE; SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS; WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS;

MONITORING;

EID: 78649509201     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-588-4-442     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? JAMA. 2003:290(2):259-64.
2. Flahault A, Boussard E, Vibert JF, Valleron AJ. Sentiweb remains efficient tool for nationwide surveillance of disease. BMJ. 1997:314(7091):1418.
3. Lober WB, Trigg LJ, Karras BT, Bliss D, Ciliberti J, Stewart L, et al. Syndromic surveillance using automated collection of computerized discharge diagnoses. J Urban Health. 2003:80 (2 Suppl 1): i97-106.
4. Revere D, Turner AM, Madhavan A, Rambo N, Bugni PF, Kimball A, et al. Understanding the information needs of public health practitioners: a literature review to inform design of an interactive digital knowledge management system. J Biomed Inform. 2007:40(4):410-21.
5. Chauvin P, Valleron AJ. Monitoring the compliance of sentinel general practitioners in public health surveillance: which GPs persevere? Int J Epidemiol. 1997:26(1):166-72.
6. Fine AM, Nigrovic LE, Reis BY, Cook EF, Mandl KD. Linking surveillance to action: incorporation of real-time regional data into a medical decision rule. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007:14(2):206-11.
7. Status of state electronic disease surveillance systems-United States, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009:58(29):804-7.
8. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium. http://www.cdisc.org.
9. Garnerin P, Valleron AJ. The French communicable diseases computer network: a technical view. Comput Biol Med. 1992:22(3):189-200.
10. Lazarus R, Klompas M, Campion FX, McNabb SJ, Hou X, Daniel J, et al. Electronic Support for Public Health: validated case finding and reporting for notifiable diseases using electronic medical data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009:16(1):18-24.
11. Hripcsak G, Soulakis ND, Li L, Morrison FP, Lai AM, Friedman C, et al. Syndromic surveillance using ambulatory electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009:16(3):354-61.
12. The UK General Practice Research Database, A powerful e-Clinical Research Tool. Clinical Research Focus. 2002 (13):48-50.
13. Kukafka R, Ancker JS, Chan C, Chelico J, Khan S, Mortoti S, et al. Redesigning electronic health record systems to support public health. J Biomed Inform. 2007:40(4):398-409.
14. Klein A, Prokosch HU, Muller M, Ganslandt T. Experiences with an interoperable data acquisition platform for multi-centric research networks based on HL7 CDA. Methods Inf Med. 2007:46(5):580-5.
15. Chen R, Klein GO, Sundvall E, Karlsson D, Ahlfeldt H. Archetype-based conversion of EHR content models: pilot experience with a regional EHR system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009:9:33.
16. XForms. http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/.
17. Integrate Healthcare Enterprise, Retrieve Form for Data Capture. http://www.ihe.net/Technical-Framework/upload/IHE-ITI-TF-Supplement-RFD-TI-2009- 08-10.pdf.