A model-driven approach for biomedical data integration

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 160, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages 1164-1168

  Carlson, David ^a   Farkash, Ariel ^b   Timm, John T E ^c  

^a Contractor to the US Veterans Health Administration ^*  (United States)

^b IBM HAIFA RESEARCH LAB   (Israel)

^c IBM ALMADEN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

CDA; Modeling; OCL; Ontology; OWL; UML

Indexed keywords

BIRDS; INFORMATION THEORY; MODELS; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

BIOMEDICAL DATA INTEGRATION; ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION; INFORMATION MODELING; INFORMATION STANDARDS; MODEL DRIVEN APPROACH; OBJECT CONSTRAINT LANGUAGE; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY; WEB ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE;

DATA INTEGRATION;

EID: 78649508421     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-588-4-1164     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. HL7 Reference Information Model, Health Level Seven, http://www.hl7.org/ v3ballot/html/infrastucture/rim/rim.htm
2. OWL, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
3. UML at OMG, http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.0/
4. Object Constraining Language specification, http://www.omg.org/ technology/documents/formal/ocl.htm
5. Hypergenes FP7 EC Project, http://www.Hypergenes.eu/
6. Stroetmann V. et al. "Semantic Interoperability for Better Health and Safer Healthcare". SemanticHEALTH Project Report, 2009. Published by the European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/information-society/ehealth
7. Heiler S: Semantic interoperability. ACM Computing Surveys 27 (2): pp271-273, 1995.
8. Gold JD, Ball MJ. "The Health Record Banking imperative", IBM Systems Journal, Vol 46, No 1, 2007
9. Bock BJ. et al. "The Data Warehouse as a Foundation for Population-Based Reference Intervals". American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 120; pp662-670, 2003.
10. Dolin RH. et al, "HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2", JAMIA 2006;13: pp30-39
11. Ferranti et al, "The Clinical Document Architecture and the Continuity of Care Record: A Critical Analysis", JAMIA 2006;13: pp245-252.
12. Smith MK, Welty C, McGuinness DL. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/, 2004
13. Schultz S., Boeker M., Stenzhorn H., "How Granularity Issues Concern Biomedical Ontology Integration". MIE, p. 863, 2008.
14. Golbreich C., Zhang S., Bodenreider O., "The foundational model of anatomy in OWL: Experience and perspectives", Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on World Wide Web, Vol 4, Issue 3: pp181-195, 2006.
15. Farkash A. et al. "Biomedical Data Integration - Capturing Similarities While Preserving Disparities", proceeding of IEEE EMBC 2009.
16. Carlson D, "Semantic Models for XML Schema with UML Tooling, " proceeding of SWESE 2006.
17. Protégé, a free, open source ontology editor and knowledge-base framework. http://protege.stanford.edu/
18. Heiler S: Semantic interoperability. ACM Computing Surveys 27 (2):271-273, 1995.
19. Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF), http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/
20. Farkash et al. "Facilitating the Creation of Semantic Health Information Models from XML Contents", CSHALS 2010