Analysis of untyped SNPs: Maximum likelihood and imputation methods

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 803-815

  Hu, Y J ^a   Lin, D Y ^a  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

Case control studies; Cross sectional studies; Genome wide association studies; Genotype; Haplotype; Hardy Weinberg equilibrium; Retrospective likelihood

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MEASUREMENT ERROR; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALGORITHMS; ALLELES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; RISK; SOFTWARE;

EID: 78649506176     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20527     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Browning SR, Browning BL. 2007. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing data inference for whole genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet 81:1084-1097.
2. Chatterjee N, Carroll RJ. 2005. Semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation exploiting gene-environment independence in case-control studies. Biometrika 92:399-418.
3. de Bakker PIW, Yelensky R, Pe'er I, Gabriel SB, Daly MJ, Altshuler D. 2005. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat Genet 37:1217-1223.
4. Lin DY, Zeng D. 2006. Likelihood-based inference on haplotype effects in genetic association studies (with discussion). J Am Stat Assoc 101:89-118.
5. Lin DY, Hu Y, Huang BE. 2008. Simple and efficient analysis of disease association with missing genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 82:444-452.
6. Little RJA. 1992. Regression with missing X's: a review. J Am Stat Assoc 87:1227-1237.
7. Marchini J, Howie B, Myers S, McVean G, Donnelly P. 2007. A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes. Nat Genet 39:906-913.
8. Nicolae DL. 2006. Testing untyped alleles (TUNA)-applications to genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 30:718-727.
9. Prentice RL, Pyke R. 1979. Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Biometrika 66:403-441.
10. Stram D. 2004. Tag SNP selection for association studies. Genet Epidemiol 27:365-374.
11. The GAIN Collaborative Research Group. 2007. New models of collaboration in genome-wide association studies: The Genetic Association Information Network. Nat Genet 39:1045-1051.
12. The International HapMap Consortium. 2005. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 437:1299-1320.
13. The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. 2007. Genome-wide association study of 14, 000 cases of seven common diseases and 3, 000 shared controls. Nature 447:661-678.
14. Xie R, Stram D. 2005. Asymptotic equivalence between two score tests for haplotype-specific risk in general linear models. Genet Epidemiol 29:166-170.
15. Zaitlen N, Kang HM, Eskin E, Halperin E. 2007. Leveraging the HapMap correlation structure in association studies. Am J Hum Genet 80:683-691.