Making the case for disciplinarity in rhetoric, composition, and writing studies: The visibility project

College Composition and Communication

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 180-215

  Phelps, Louise Wetherbee ^a   Ackerman, John M ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649491737     PISSN: 0010096X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Agamben, Giorgio. "What Is an Apparatus?" What Is an Apparatus? and Other Essays. Trans. David Kishik. Palo Alto: Stanford UP, 2009. 1-14. Print.
2. Brint, Steven. "The Rise of the Practical Arts." The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University. Ed. Steven Brint. Palo Alto: Stanford UP, 2002. 231-59. Print.
3. Castells, Manuel. "The Space of Flows." Rethinking Technology: A Reader in Architectural Theory. Ed. William W. Braham and Jonathan A. Hale. London: Routledge, 2007. 440-56. Print.
4. CIP [Classification of Instructional Programs]- 2000. The Integrated Postsecondary Education System (IPEDS). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Web. 26 June 2009.
5. CIP [Classification of Instructional Programs]- 2010. The Integrated Postsecondary Education System (IPEDS). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Web. 1 July 2010.
6. Cohen, Anthony P. The Symbolic Construction of Community. London: Routledge, 1985. Print.
7. Foucault, Michel. "Security, Territory, and Population." Michel Foucault, Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. Ed. Paul Rabinow. New York: New P, 1997. 67-71. Print.
8. Gaonkar, Dilip. "Rhetoric and Its Double: Reflections on the Rhetorical Turn in the Human Sciences." Contemporary Rhetorical Theory. Ed. John Lucaites, Celeste Condit, and Sally Caudill. New York: Guilford, 1999. 194-212. Print.
9. Goggin, Maureen. Authoring a Discipline: Scholarly Journals and the Post-World War II Emergence of Rhetoric and Composition. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 2000. Print.
10. Jaschik, Scott. "How Ph.D. Programs Will Be Judged." Inside Higher Education 10 July 2009. Web. 26 Nov. 2009.
11. Knorr-Cetina, Karin. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999. Print.
12. Mailloux, Steven. Disciplinary Identities: Rhetorical Paths of English, Speech and Composition. New York: MLA, 2006. Print.
13. Miller, Carolyn. "Should We Name the Tools? Concealing and Revealing the Art of Rhetoric." The Public Work of Rhetoric: Citizen-Scholars and Civic Engagement. Ed. John Ackerman and David Coogan. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, in press. Print.
14. Ostriker, Jeremiah P., et al., eds. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Committee to Assess Research-Doctorate Programs. National Research Council, 2009. National Academies P. Web. 20 Jan. 2010.
15. Ostriker, Jeremiah P., and Charlotte Kuh, eds. Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs: A Methodology Study. National Research Council, 2003. National Academies P. Web. 20 Jan. 2010.
16. Parry, Marc. "How to Prepare Your College for an Uncertain Digital Future." Chronicle of Higher Education 13 Dec. 2009. Web. 15 Dec. 2009.
17. Phelps, Louise Wetherbee. Composition as a Human Science. New York: Oxford UP, 1988. Print.
18. Research Doctorate Programs. "Taxonomy of Fields and Their Subfields." National Academy of Sciences, 2009. Web. 25 Sept. 2009.
19. Scott, Patrick. "Bibliographical Resources and Problems." An Introduction to Composition Studies. Ed. Erika Lindemann and Gary Tate. New York: Oxford UP. 72-93. Print.
20. Terrill, Jeremy. Mapping a Geographical History of Digital Technology in Rhetoric and Composition. Mapping Digital Technology. Web. 12 Oct. 2009.