Outcome evaluation of carotid stenting in high-risk patients with symptomatic carotid near occlusion

Interventional Neuroradiology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 309-316

  Choi, B S ^a,b   Park, J W ^a   Shin, J E ^a   Lu P H ^a,c   Kim, J K ^d   Kim, S J ^a   Lee, D H ^a   Kim, J S ^a   Kim, H J ^e   Suh, Dae Chul ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^c YANGZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d Chung Ang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e Daejeon St Mary's Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Carotid arteries; Outcome; Stenosis or obstruction; Stenting

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MALE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; RANKIN SCALE; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78649490792     PISSN: 15910199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/159101991001600314     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berman SS, Devine JJ, Erdoes LS, et al. Distinguishing carotid artery pseudo-occlusion with color-flow Doppler. Stroke. 1995; 26(3): 434-438.
2. Mehigan JT, Olcott CT. The carotid "string" sign. Differential diagnosis and management. Am J Surg. 1980; 140(1): 137-143.
3. Suh DC, Kim JK, Choi CG, et al. Prognostic factors for neurologic outcome after endovascular revascularization of acute symptomatic occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28(6): 1167-1171.
4. Pappas JN. The angiographic string sign. Radiology. 2002; 222(1): 237-238.
5. Henderson RD, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, et al. Angiographically defined collateral circulation and risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Stroke. 2000; 31(1): 128-132.
6. Rothwell PM, Warlow CP. Low risk of ischemic stroke in patients with reduced internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe symptomatic carotid stenosis: cerebral protection due to low poststenotic flow? On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Stroke. 2000; 31(3): 622-630.
7. Group E. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998; 351(9113): 1379-1387.
8. Morgenstern LB, Fox AJ, Sharpe BL, et al. The risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in patients with near occlusion of the carotid artery. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Neurology. 1997; 48(4): 911-915.
9. Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Birkmeyer JD, et al. Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. JAMA. 1998; 279(16): 1278-1281.
10. Whitlow PL, Lylyk P, Londero H, et al. Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system. Stroke. 2002; 33(5): 1308-1314. (Pubitemid 34517052)
11. Fox AJ, Eliasziw M, Rothwell PM, et al. Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26(8): 2086-2094.
12. Rothwell PM, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP. Reanalysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial. Stroke. 2003; 34(2): 514-523.
13. Schulz UG, Rothwell PM. Sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy and the distribution of atherosclerotic plaque. Stroke. 2001; 32(7): 1525-1531.
14. Kim HJ, Choi BS, Choi JW, et al. Stent implantation of multichanneled pseudoocclusion of the internal carotid artery. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009; 20(3): 391-395.
15. Liu S, Jung JH, Kim SM, et al. Simultaneous bilateral carotid stenting in high-risk patients. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A.
16. Park ST, Kim JK, Yoon KH, et al. Atherosclerotic carotid stenoses of apical versus body lesions in high-risk carotid stenting patients. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; ajnr.A2000.
17. Pyun HW, Suh DC, Kim JK, et al. Concomitant multiple revascularizations in supra-aortic arteries: short-term results in 50 patients. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28(10): 1895-1901.
18. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988; 19(5): 604-607.
19. Setacci C, Chisci E, Setacci F, et al. Grading carotid intrastent restenosis: a 6-year follow-up study. Stroke. 2008; 39(4): 1189-1196. (Pubitemid 351440690)
20. Cho AH, Suh DC, Kim GE, et al. MRI evidence of reperfusion injury associated with neurological deficits after carotid revascularization procedures. Eur J Neurol. 2009; 16(9): 1066-1069.
21. Gil-Peralta A, Gonzalez A, Gonzalez-Marcos JR, et al. Internal carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic atheromatous pseudo-occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004; 17(Suppl. 1): 105-112. (Pubitemid 38032528)
22. Terada T, Tsuura M, Matsumoto H, et al. Endovascular treatment for pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Neurosurgery. 2006; 59(2): 301-309; discussion 309.
23. Greiner C, Wassmann H, Palkovic S, et al. Revascularization procedures in internal carotid artery pseudoocclusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004; 146(3): 237- 243; discussion 243. (Pubitemid 38436323)
24. Cremonesi A, Manetti R, Setacci F, et al. Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients. Stroke. 2003; 34(8): 1936-1941.
25. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(15): 1493-1501.