What is the predict level of which computer using skills measured in PISA for achievement in mathematics

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 185-191

  Ziya, Engin ^a   Dogan, Nuri ^b   Kelecioglu, Hülya ^b  

^a TURKISH MILITARY ACADEMY   (Turkey)

^b HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649476480     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Akinsola, M. K. & Animasahun, I. A. (2007). The effect of simulation-games environment on students achievement in and attitudes to mathematics in secondary schools. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6, 3. Retrieved July 4, 2010 from http://www.tojet.net/
2. Altun, A. (2007). Effects of student and school related factors on the mathematics achievement in Turkey at eight grade level. Unpublished master thesis. Ankara: Meddile East Technical University.
3. Aypay, A. (2010). Information and communication technology (ICT) usage and achivement of Turkish students in PISA 2006. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 2. Retrieved July 4, 2010 from http://www.tojet.net/
4. Bohannon, H. G. (1998). The relationship between frequency of computer use and student performance among fifth grade students. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. University of South Florida. Retrieved April 2, 2008 from UMI.
5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Data analysis handbook for social sciences. Ankara: PegemA.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
7. Cossa, R. D. (2000). Determinants of schooling attainment in Argentina: an ampirical analysis with extensions to policy evaluation. Doktora Tezi. The University of Chicago. 02 Nisan 2008 Erişim: UMI.
8. Çifçi, A. (2006). Acoording to mathematics subtest results of PISA 2003 investigation of some factors' effect on student achievement in Turkey. Unpublished master thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.
9. Duke, V. C. (2007). Technology and Math: The relationship between using computers in the fifth grade and demonstrating math competencies. Unpublishede doctoral thesis. School of Education Capella University. Retrieved April 2, 2008 from UMI.
10. Duman, A. (2006). Evaulation of the factors which effect on mathematics achievement of primary school students for students and teachers (Eskişehir sample). Unpublished master thesis. Eskişehir: Osmangazi University.
11. Duran, N. (2005). An investigation about mathematical thinkink skills. Unpublished master thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.
12. Güven, B. & Kosa, T. (2008). The effect of dynamic geometry software on student mathematics teachers' spatial visualization skills. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7, 4. Retrieved July 4, 2010 from http://www.tojet.net/
13. Herron, J. (2007). Culturally relevant word problems: The effects on second graders'mathematics achievement. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Utah State University. Retrieved April 2, 2008 from UMI.
14. İş, Ç. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of factors affecting mathematical literacy of students in programme for international student assessment (PISA). Unpublished master thesis. Ankara: Meddile East Technical University.
15. Khalid, N. (1997). Factors affecting mathematics achievement in malaysian schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Indiana University. Retrieved 2 April, 2008 from UMI.
16. King, M. J. (1998). The effects of frequency of technology use on high school students' mathematics and science achievement. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Faculty of the Collage of Education. University of Houston. Retrieved 2 April, 2008 from UMI.
17. Levin, J., Fox, J.A. (2007). Elementery statistics in social research. The Essentials. Boston: Pearson Education,Inc.
18. Milli Egitim Bakanligi. (2005). PISA 2003 projesi ulusal nihai raporu. Ankara: Milli Egitim Basimevi.
19. Milli Egitim Bakanligi. (2007). PISA 2006 uluslararasi ögrenci başarilarini degerlendirme programi ulusal ön rapor. Ankara: Milli Egitim Basimevi.
20. Neter, J., Wasseman, W., Kutner, M.H. (1985). Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance and experimental designs. Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
21. Nonoyama, Y. (2006). A cross-national, multi-level study of family background and school resource effects on student achievement. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Columbia University. Retrieved 6 July, 2007 from UMI.
22. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD Publications.
23. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2005). PISA 2003 Technical report. Paris: OECD Publications.
24. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2006a). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD Publications.
25. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2006b). PISA. The OECD program for international student assessment. Paris: OECD Publications.
26. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2007). PISA 2006-science competencies for tomorrow's world: Volume 1. Paris: OECD Publications.
27. Özdamar, K. (1997). Statistical data analysis with packaged software I. MINITAB, SPSS, SYSTAT. Eskişehir: Anadolu Universty Faculty of Science Publications.
28. Papanastasiou, C. (2000). Internal and external factors affecting achievement in mathematics: Some finding from TIMSS. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 1-7. Retrieved 5 April, 2008 from ERIC.
29. Papanastasiou, E. (2002). Factors that differantiate mathematics students in Cyprus, Hong Kong, and the USA. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8, 129-146. Retrieved 5 April, 2008 from ERIC.
30. Papanastasiou, E. C. ve Ferdig R. E. (2006). Computer use and mathematic literacy: An analysis of existing and potential relationships. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25 (4), 361-371. Retrieved 6 December, 2007 from ERIC.
31. Park, H. (2005). Cross-national variation in the effects of family background and schools on students achievement: The Relevance of Institutional and Policy Contexts. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved 6 July, 2007 from UMI.
32. Paton, G. (2010). Home computers harm children's test results. Retrieved July 4, 2010 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/7844273/Home-computer s-harm-childrens-testresults.html
33. Rakap, S. (2010). Impacts of learning styles and computer skills on adult students' learning online. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 2. Retrieved July 4, 2010 from http://www.tojet.net/
34. Ram, A. (2006). A multilevel analysis of mathematics literacy in Canada and Japan: The effects of sex differences, teacher support, and the school learning environment. Unpublished master thesis. The Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies. University of Victoria. Retrieved 5 December, 2007 from ProQuest.
35. Sullivan, A. W. (2005). The relationship among selected teacher quality characteristics, teacher resource use and nathematics achievemet in selected mississippi public high schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis. The Department of Curriculum and Instruction Mississippi State University. Retrieved 2 July, 2008 from UMI.
36. Triola, M. F. (2005). Elementary statistics. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
37. Xu, J. (2006). Families, investments in children and education: A Cross-national approach. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Indiana University Department of Sociology. Retrieved 5 July, 2007 from UMI.
38. Yilmaz, E. T. (2006). The factors which effect on mathematics achievement of Turkish students in PISA 2003. Unpublished master thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.