Guest editors’ introduction: Making the cultural turn

Technical Communication Quarterly

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 3-7

  Scott, J Blake ^a   Longo, Bernadette ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649467687     PISSN: 10572252     EISSN: 15427625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_2     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Blyler, N.R. (1998). Taking a political turn: The critical perspective and research in professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, 33–52.
2. Blyler, N. R., & Thralls, C. (1993). The social perspective and professional communication. In N. R. Blyler & C. Thralls (Eds.), Professional communication: The social perspective (pp. 3–34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Hall, S. (1996). Cultural studies and its theoretical legacies. In D. Morley & K.-H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 262–275). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Herndl, C. G. (1993). Teaching discourse and reproducing culture: A critique of research and pedagogy in professional and non-academic writing. College Composition and Communication, 44, 349–363.
5. Katz, S. B. (1992). The ethic of expediency: Classical rhetoric, technology, and the Holocaust. College English, 54, 255–275.
6. Longo, B. (1998). An approach for applying cultural study theory to technical writing research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, 53–73.
7. Scott, J. B., Longo, B., & Wills, K. V. (in press). Introduction: Why cultural studies? In J. B. Scott, B. Longo, & K. V. Wills (Eds.), Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8. Sullivan, D. L. (1990). Political-ethical implications of defining technical communication as a practice. Journal of Advanced Composition, 10, 375–386.
9. Thralls, C. (2004). Reflection on “The social perspective and professional communication.” In J. Johnson-Eilola & S. A. Selber (Eds.), Central works in technical communication (pp.124–125). NewYork: Oxford.