Individual and dyadic predictors of body image in women with breast cancer

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1061-1068

  Zimmermann, Tanja ^a   Scott, Jennifer L ^b   Heinrichs, Nina ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^c BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

breast cancer; couples and cancer; women and oncology; women's body image; women's psychological functioning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; DEPRESSION; DISEASE DURATION; DYADIC ADJUSTMENT SCALE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARITAL THERAPY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERCEPTION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; SATISFACTION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY IMAGE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEXUAL PARTNERS; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 78649464695     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.1660     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2008. American Cancer Society: Atlanta, 2008.
2. Dausch BM, Compas BE, Beckjord E, et al,. Rates and correlates of DSM-IV diagnoses in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. J Clin Psychol Med S 2004; 11: 159-169.
3. Fobair P, Spiegel D,. Concerns about sexuality after breast cancer. Cancer J 2009; 15 (1): 19-26.
4. Ogden J, Lindridge L,. The impact of breast scarring on perceptions of attractiveness. J Health Psychol 2008; 13 (3): 303-310.
5. White C,. Body images in oncology. In Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research and Clinical Practice, Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, (eds). Guilford Press: New York, 2002. p 530.
6. White CA,. Body image dimension and cancer: a heuristic cognitive behavioural model. Psycho-Oncol 2000; 9: 183-192.
7. Carver CS, Pozo-Kaderman C, Price AA, et al,. Concerns about aspects of body image and adjustment to early stage cancer. Psychosom Med 1998; 60 (2): 168-174.
8. Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Belin TR, et al,. Predictors of sexual health in women after a breast cancer diagnosis. JClin Oncol 1999; 17 (8): 2371-2380.
9. Moyer A,. Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conservation surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychol 1997; 16: 284-289.
10. Kornblith AB, Ligibel J,. Psychosocial and sexual functioning of survivors of breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2003; 30 (6): 799-813.
11. Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, et al,. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer I 2000; 92 (17): 1422-1429.
12. Baucom DH, Porter LS, Kirby JS, et al,. Psychosocial issues confronting young women with breast cancer. Breast Disease 2005; 23: 103-113.
13. Kornblith A, Powell M, Regan M, et al,. Long-term psychosocial adjustment of older vs younger survivors of breast and endometrial cancer. Psycho-Oncol 2007; 16: 895-903.
14. Noles SW, Cash TF, Winstead BA,. Body image, physical attractiveness, and depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 1985; 53: 88-94.
15. Stice E, Wayward C, Cameron RP, et al,. Body image and eating distrubances predict onset of depression among female adolescents: a longitudinal study. J Abnorm Psychol 2000; 109: 438-444.
16. Andritsch E, Dietmaier G, Hofmann G, et al,. Global quality of life and its potential predictors in breast cancer patients: an exploratory study. Support Care Cancer 2007; 15: 21-30.
17. Bodenmann G,. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In Couples Coping with Stress, Revenson T, Kayser K, Bodenmann G, (eds). American Psychological Association: Washington D.C., 2005. p 33-49.
18. Hart J, Shaver PR, Goldenberg JL,. Attachment, self-esteem, worldviews, and terror management: evidence for a tripartite security system. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005; 88: 999-1031.
19. Scott JL, Kayser K,. A review of couples based interventions for enhancing women's sexual adjustment and body image after cancer. Cancer J 2009; 15 (1): 48-56.
20. Scott JL, Kayser K,. Enhancing coping with cancer: a couple-bases approach. In Pscho-oncology: A Relational Perspective, Saita E, (ed.). Edizioni Unicopli: Milano, Italy, 2009. p 155-180.
21. Baucom DH, Porter LS, Kirby JS, et al,. A couple-based intervention for female breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol 2009; 18: 276-283.
22. Manne SL, Ostroff JS, Winkel G,. Social-cognitive processes as moderators of a couple-focused group intervention for women with early stage breast cancer. Health Psychol 2007; 26 (6): 735-744.
23. Manne S, Rini C, Goldstein L, et al,. The interpersonal process model of intimicy: The role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners. J Fam Psychol 2004; 18 (4): 589-599.
24. Scott JL, Halford WK, Ward B,. United we stand? The effects of a couple-coping intervention on adjustment to breast or gynaecological cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004; 72: 1122-1135.
25. Wimberly S, Carver C, Laurenceau JP, et al,. Perceived partner reactions to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: Impact on psychosocial and psychosexual adjustment. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005; 73 (2): 300-311.
26. Stanton AL, Estes MA, Cameron NC, et al,. Treatment decision making and adjustment to breast cancer: a longitudinal study. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66 (2): 313-322.
27. Heinrichs N, Zimmermann T,. Bewältigung einer gynäkologischen Krebserkrankung in der Partnerschaft: Ein psycho-onkologisches Behandlungsprogramm für Paare, Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2008.
28. Zimmermann T, Heinrichs N, Scott JL,. CanCope 'Schritt für Schritt': Die Effektivität eines partnerschaftlichen Unterstützungsprogramms bei Frauen mit Brust-oder gynäkologischen Krebserkrankungen. Verhaltenstherapie 2006; 16 (4): 247-255.
29. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP,. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiat Scand 1983; 67 (6): 361-370.
30. Radloff L,. The CES-D Scale: a new self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas 1977; 1: 385-401.
31. Mehnert A,. Akute und posttraumatische Belastungsstörungen bei Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs: Prävalenz und Risikofaktoren. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universität Hamburg: Hamburg, 2004. p 195.
32. Härter M, Reuter K, Aschenbrenner A, et al,. Psychiatric disorders and associated factors in cancer: results of an interview study with patients in inpatient, rehabilitation and outpatient treatment. Eur J Cancer 2001; 27: 1385-1393.
33. Parker PA, Youssef A, Walker S, et al,. Short-term and long-term psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in women undergoing different surgical procedures for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14 (11): 3078-3089.
34. Norton TR,. Measuring marital quality: a critical look at the dependent variable. J Marriage Fam 1983; 45: 141-151.
35. Sharpley CF, Rogers HJ,. Preliminary validation of the Abbreviated Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale: some psychometric data regarding a screening test of marital adjustment. Educ Psychol Meas 1984; 44: 1045-1050.
36. Sabourin S, Valois P, Lussier Y,. Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychol Assessment 2005; 17 (1): 15-27.
37. Bodenmann G,. Verhaltenstherapie mit Paaren. Bern: Hans Huber, 2004.
38. Brace N, Kemp R, Snelgar R,. SPSS for Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, New Jersey, 2006.
39. Bühl A, Zöfel P,. SPSS Version 10. Einführung in die moderne Datenanalyse unter Windows. Addison Wesley Verlag: München, 2000.
40. Chrisler JC,. Body image issues of women over 50. In Women over 50. Psychological Perspectives, Muhlbauer V, Chrisler JC, (eds). Springer: New York, 2007.
41. Fehlhauer F, Tribius S, Mehnert A, Rades D,. Health-related quality of life in long term breast cancer survivors treated with breast conserving therapy: impact of age at therapy. Breast Cancer Res Tr 2005; 92: 217-222.
42. Neises M, Sabok Sir M,. Lebensqualität von Mammakarzinompatientinnen unter den besonderen Aspekten der Operationsart und des Alters. In Psychosomatische Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Beiträge der Jahrestagung 1994/1995, Frick-Burder V, Scheele M, Kentenich H, (eds). Psychosozial-Verlag: Giessen, 1995. p 232-244.
43. Sellick SM, Crooks DL,. Depression and cancer: an appraisal of the literature for prevalence, detection, and practice guidline development for psychological interventions. Psycho-Oncol 1999; 8: 315-333.
44. Reich M, Lesur A, Perdrizet-Chevallier C,. Depression, quality of life and breast cancer: a review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Tr 2008; 110: 9-17.
45. Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, et al,. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a propective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 1060-1068.
46. Ganz PA, Schag AC, Lee JJ, et al,. Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer 1992; 69: 1729-1738.
47. Janni W, Rjosk D, Dimpfl TH, et al,. Quality of life influenced by primary surgical treatment for stage I-III breast cancer-long-term follow-up of a matched-pair analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8: 542-548.
48. Warm M, Gatermann C, Kates R, et al,. Postoperative sense of well-being and quality of life in breast cancer patients do not depend on type of primary surgery. Onkologie 2008; 31: 99-104.
49. Boyes AD, Fletcher GJ, Latner JD,. Male and female body image and dieting in the context of intimate relationships. J Fam Psychol 2007; 21 (4): 764-768.
50. Helgeson VS, Cohen S,. Social support and adjustment to cancer: reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention. Health Psychol 1996; 15: 135-148.
51. Neuling SJ, Winefield HR,. Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: frequency and correlates of supportive behaviours by family friends and surgeon. Soc Sci Med 1988; 27: 385-392.
52. Wortman CB,. Social support and the cancer patient. Conceptual and methodologic issues. Cancer 1984; 53 (10 Suppl): 2339-2362.
53. Manne S, Ostroff J, Sherman M, et al,. Couples' support-related communication, psychological distress, and relationship satisfaction among women with early stage breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004; 72 (4): 660-670.
54. Drigotas SM, Rusbult CE, Wieselequist J, Whitton SW,. Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the michelangelo phenomenon. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 77 (2): 293-323.
55. Bolger N, DeLongis A, Kessler RC, Wethington E,. The microstructure of daily role-related stress in married couples. In Stress Between Work and Family. The Plenum Series on Stress and Coping, Eckenrode J, Gore S, (eds). Plenum Press: New York, NY, 1990. p 95-115.
56. Epstein N, Baucom DH,. Enhanced Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Couples: A Contextual Approach. American Psychological Association: Washington D.C., 2002.
57. Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, et al,. Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull 2008; 134 (1): 1-30.