In Ovo Olfactory Experience Influences Post-hatch Feeding Behaviour in Young Chickens

Ethology

Volumn 116, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1027-1037

  Bertin, Aline ^a   Calandreau, Ludovic ^a   Arnould, Cécile ^a   Nowak, Raymond ^a   Levy, Frederic ^a   Noirot, Virginie ^b   Bouvarel, Isabelle ^c   Leterrier, Christine ^a  

^a UMR85 PHYSIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION ET DES COMPORTEMENTS   (France)

^b Laboratoires Phodé ZI Albipôle La Martelle   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; DOMESTIC SPECIES; EMBRYO; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HATCHING; MAMMAL; ODOR; OLFACTORY CUE; POULTRY; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; REGULATORY APPROACH;

AVES; GALLUS GALLUS; MAMMALIA; SPONDIAS PURPUREA;

EID: 78649462078     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01820.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aldridge, V., Dovey, T. M. & Halford, J. C. G. 2009: The role of familiarity in dietary development. Dev. Rev. 29, 32-44.
2. Balthazart, J. & Taziaux, M. 2009: The underestimated role of olfaction in avian reproduction? Behav. Brain Res. 200, 248-259.
3. Bilko, A., Altbacker, V. & Hudson, R. 1994: Transmission of food preference in the rabbit: the means of information transfer. Physiol. Behav. 56, 907-912.
4. Bonadonna, F. & Nevitt, G. A. 2004: Partner-specific odor recognition in an Antarctic seabird. Science 306, 835-835.
5. Bonadonna, F., Cunningham, G. B., Jouventin, P., Hesters, F. & Nevitt, G. A. 2003: Evidence for nest-odour recognition in two species of diving petrel. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 3719-3722.
6. Burne, T. H. J. & Rogers, L. J. 1996: Responses to odorants by the domestic chick. Physiol. Behav. 60, 1441-1447.
7. Burne, T. H. J. & Rogers, L. J. 1999: Changes in olfactory responsiveness by the domestic chick after early exposure to odorants. Anim. Behav. 58, 329-336.
8. Cohen, J. 1988: Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
9. Coureaud, G., Schaal, B., Hudson, R., Orgeur, P. & Coudert, P. 2002: Transnatal olfactory continuity in the rabbit: behavioral evidence and short-term consequence of its disruption. Dev. Psychobiol. 40, 372-390.
10. Coureaud, G., Langlois, D., Sicard, G. & Schaal, B. 2004: Newborn rabbit responsiveness to the mammary pheromone is concentration-dependent. Chem. Senses 29, 341-350.
11. Cunningham, S. J., Castro, I. & Potter, M. A. 2009: The relative importance of olfaction and remote touch in prey detection by North Island brown kiwis. Anim. Behav. 78, 899-905.
12. Garamszegi, L. Z. 2006: Comparing effect sizes across variables: generalization without the need for Bonferroni correction. Behav. Ecol. 17, 682-687.
13. Garcia, L. V. 2004: Escaping the Bonferroni iron claw in ecological studies. Oikos 105, 657-663.
14. Gentle, M. J. 1985: Sensory involvement in the control of food intake in poultry. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 44, 313-321.
15. Gomez, G. & Celii, A. 2008: The peripheral olfactory system of the domestic chicken: physiology and development. Brain Res. Bull. 76, 208-216.
16. Gwinner, H. & Berger, S. 2008: Starling males select green nest material by olfaction using experience-independent and experience-dependent cues. Anim. Behav. 75, 971-976.
17. Hagelin, J. C. & Jones, I. L. 2007: Bird odors and other chemical substances: a defense mechanism or overlooked mode of intraspecific communication? Auk 124, 741-761.
18. Haskell, M. J., Vilarino, M., Savina, M., Atamna, J. & Picard, M. 2001: Do broiler chicks have a cognitive representation of food quality? Appetitive, behavioural and ingestive responses to a change in diet quality Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 72, 63-77.
19. Ioale, P., Nozzolini, M. & Papi, F. 1990: Homing in pigeons do extract directional information from olfactory stimuli. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26, 301-305.
20. Jones, R. B. 1986: Response of domestic chicks to novel food as a function of sex, strain and previous experience. Behav. Processes 12, 261-271.
21. Jones, R. B. 1987: Food neophobia and olfaction in domestic chicks. Bird Behav. 7, 78-81.
22. Jones, R. B. & Gentle, M. J. 1985: Olfaction and behavioral modification in domestic chicks (Gallus domesticus) Physiol. Behav. 34, 917-924.
23. Jones, R. B. & Roper, T. J. 1997: Olfaction in the domestic fowl: a critical review. Physiol. Behav. 62, 1009-1018.
24. Jones, R. B., Mills, A. D. & Faure, J. M. 1991: Genetic and experiential manipulation of fear-related behavior in Japanese quail chicks (Coturnix coturnix japonica). J. Comp. Psychol. 105, 15-24.
25. Jorge, P. E., Marques, A. E. & Phillips, J. B. 2009: Activational rather than navigational effects of odors on homing of young pigeons. Curr. Biol. 19, 650-654.
26. Jozsa, R., Hollosy, T., Tamas, A., Toth, G., Lengvari, I. & Reglodi, D. 2005: Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide plays a role in olfactory memory formation in chicken. Peptides 26, 2344-2350.
27. Jung, Y., Wirkus, E., Amendola, D. & Gomez, G. 2005: Characteristics of odorant elicited calcium fluxes in acutely-isolated chick olfactory neurons. J. Comp. Physiol. A -Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 191, 511-520.
28. Lalloue, F. L., Ayer-Le-Lievre, C. S. & Sicard, G. 2003: Analysis of the functional maturation of olfactory neurons in chicks before and after birth. Chem. Senses 28, 729-737.
29. Launchbaugh, K. L., Provenza, F. D. & Werkmeister, M. J. 1997: Overcoming food neophobia in domestic ruminants through addition of a familiar flavor and repeated exposure to novel foods. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54, 327-334.
30. Mabayo, R. T., Okumura, J., Hirao, A., Sugita, S., Sugahara, K. & Furuse, M. 1996: The role of olfaction in oil preference in the chicken. Physiol. Behav. 59, 1185-1188.
31. Marples, N. M. & Kelly, D. J. 1999: Neophobia and dietary conservatism: two distinct processes? Evol. Ecol. 13, 641-653.
32. Marples, N. M. & Roper, T. J. 1996: Effects of novel colour and smell on the response of naive chicks towards food and water. Anim. Behav. 51, 1417-1424.
33. McKeegan, D. E. F., Demmers, T. G. M., Wathes, C. M., Jones, R. B. & Gentle, M. J. 2002: Stimulus-response functions of single avian olfactory bulb neurones. Brain Res. 953, 101-111.
34. Mennerat, A. 2008: Blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) respond to an experimental change in the aromatic plant odour composition of their nest. Behav. Processes 79, 189-191.
35. Nakagawa, S. 2004: A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav. Ecol. 15, 1044-1045.
36. Nikaido, Y. & Nakashima, T. 2009: Effects of environmental novelty on fear-related behavior and stress responses of rats to emotionally relevant odors. Behav. Brain Res. 199, 241-246.
37. O'Dwyer, T. W. & Nevitt, G. A. 2009: Individual odor recognition in procellariiform chicks potential role for the major histocompatibility complex. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1170, 442-446.
38. Porter, R. H. & Picard, M. 1998: Effects of early odor exposure in domestic chicks. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 38, 441-448.
39. Porter, R. H., Picard, M., Arnould, C. & Tallet, C. 2002: Chemosensory deficits are associated with reduced weight gain in newly hatched chicks. Anim. Res. 51, 337-345.
40. Robinzon, B., Snapir, N. & Perek, M. 1977: Removal of olfactory bulbs in chickens: consequent changes in food intake and thyroid activity. Brain Res. Bull. 2, 263-271.
41. Schaal, B. & Orgeur, P. 1992: Olfaction in utero: can the rodent model be generalized. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 44B, 245-278.
42. Schaal, B., Marlier, L. & Soussignan, R. 2000: Human foetuses learn odours from their pregnant mother's diet. Chem. Senses 25, 729-737.
43. Sneddon, H., Hadden, R. & Hepper, P. G. 1998: Chemosensory learning in the chicken embryo. Physiol. Behav. 64, 133-139.
44. Steiger, S. S., Fidler, A. E., Valcu, M. & Kempenaers, B. 2008: Avian olfactory receptor gene repertoires: evidence for a well-developed sense of smell in birds? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275, 2309-2317.
45. Tolhurst, B. E. & Vince, M. A. 1976: Sensitivity to odours in the embryo of the domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. 24, 772-779.
46. Turro, I., Porter, R. H. & Picard, M. 1994: Olfactory cues mediate food selection by young chicks. Physiol. Behav. 55, 761-767.
47. Youngentob, S. L. & Glendinning, J. I. 2009: Fetal ethanol exposure increases ethanol intake by making it smell and taste better. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 106, 5359-5364.