Flow dynamics past a simplified wing body junction

Physics of Fluids

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2010, Pages

  Gand, Fabien ^a   Deck, Sébastien ^a   Brunet, Vincent ^a   Sagaut, Pierre ^b  

^a ONERA   (France)

^b INSTITUT JEAN LE ROND D ALEMBERT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW; BOUNDARY LAYERS; DELTA WING AIRCRAFT; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; WIND TUNNELS;

ADVERSE PRESSURE GRADIENT; BOUNDARY LAYER THICKNESS; FREE-STREAM VELOCITY; HORSESHOE VORTICES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MOMENTUM THICKNESS; MULTIPLE FREQUENCY; NORMALIZED FREQUENCIES;

VORTEX FLOW;

EID: 78649454871     PISSN: 10706631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3500697     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aly M. Trupp C. Gerrard D. Measurements and prediction of a fully developed turbulent flow in an equilateral triangular duct. J. Fluid Mech. 1978, 85:57. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112078000531.
2. Bradshaw P. Turbulent secondary flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1987, 19:53. ARVFA3, 0066-4189, 10.1146/annurev.fl.19.010187.000413.
3. Gessner F. The origin of secondary flow in turbulent flow along a corner. J. Fluid Mech. 1973, 58:1. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112073002090.
4. Nakayama A. Rahaij H. Measurements of turbulent flow behind a flat plate mounted normal to the wall. AIAA J. 1984, 22:1817. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.8857.
5. Kornilov V. Kharitonov A. Investigation of the structure of turbulent flows in streamwise asymmetric corner configurations. Exp. Fluids 1984, 2:205. EXFLDU, 0723-4864, 10.1007/BF00571867.
6. Kubendran L. McMahon H. Hubbartt J. Turbulent flow around a wing/fuselage type juncture. AIAA J. 1986, 24:1447. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.9464.
7. McMahon H. Merati P. Yoo K. Mean velocities and Reynolds stresses in the juncture flow and in the shear layer downstream of an appendage. 1987, and Georgia Institute of Technology Technical Report No. GITAER87-4, Atlanta.
8. Mehta R. Effect of wing nose shape on the flow in a wing body junction. Aeronaut. J. 1984, 88:456. AENJAK, 0001-9240.
9. Shabaka I. Bradshaw P. Turbulent flow measurements in an idealized wing/body junction. AIAA J. 1981, 19:131. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.50931.
10. Abdulla A. Bhargava R. Raj R. An experimental study of local wall shear stress, surface static pressure, and flow visualization upstream, alongside, and downstream of a blade endwall corner. J. Turbomach. 1991, 113:626. JOTUEI, 0889-504X, 10.1115/1.2929128.
11. Abdulla A. Raj R. Three dimensional flow structure in the wake of a wing body juncture. 1994, and AIAA Paper No. 94-2289.
12. Ahmed A. Khan M. Effect of sweep on wing body juncture flows. 1995, and AIAA Paper No. 95-0868.
13. Arnott A. Bernstein L. The aerodynamic interaction at the junction between a forward swept wing and a plate. Aeronaut. J. 2000, February:67. AENJAK, 0001-9240.
14. Barber T. An investigation of strut-wall intersection losses. J. Aircr. 1978, 15:676. JAIRAM, 0021-8669, 10.2514/3.58427.
15. Bernstein L. Hamid S. On the effect of a swept wing plate junction flow on the lift and drag. Aeronaut. J. 1995, August/September:293. AENJAK, 0001-9240.
16. Chang B. Gessner F. Experimental investigation of flow about a strut-endwall configuration. AIAA J. 1991, 29:2105. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.10847.
17. Devenport W. Agarwal N. Dewitz M. Simpson R. Effects of a leading edge fillet on the flow near and past an appendage body junction. AIAA J. 1992, 30:2177. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.11201.
18. Devenport W. Simpson R. Time dependent and time averaged turbulence structure near the nose of a wing/body junction. J. Fluid Mech. 1990, 210:23. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112090001215.
19. Dickinson S. An experimental investigation of appendage-flat plate junction flow, Vol. 1: Description. 1986, David Taylor Naval Ships Research and Development Center Technical Report No. DTNSRDC-86/051.
20. Fleming J. Simpson R. Cowling J. Devenport W. An experimental study of a turbulent wing-body junction and wake flow. Exp. Fluids 1993, 14:366. EXFLDU, 0723-4864, 10.1007/BF00189496.
21. Goody M. An experimental investigation of pressure fluctuations in three dimensional turbulent boundary layers. 1999, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
22. Hasan M. Casarella M. Rood E. An experimental study of the flow and wall pressure field around a wing-body junction. Trans. ASME, J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des. 1986, 108:308. JVADDM, 0739-3717.
23. Jupp J. Interference aspects of the A310 high speed wing configuration. 1980, Subsonic/Transonic Configuration Aerodynamics AGARD CP 285 Paper No. 11.
24. Khan M. Experimental investigation of the influence of wing sweep on juncture flow. 1994, Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, Aerospace Engineering Department.
25. Menna J. Pierce F. The mean flow structure around and within a turbulent junction vortex-Part I: The upstream and surrounding three-dimensionnal boundary layer. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 1988, 110:406. JFEGA4, 0098-2202, 10.1115/1.3243571.
26. Ölçmen S. Simpson R. An experimental study of a three-dimensional pressure driven turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 1995, 290:225. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112095002497.
27. Philips D. Cimbala J. Treaster A.L. Suppression of the wing-body junction vortex by body surface suction. J. Aircr. 1992, 29:118. JAIRAM, 0021-8669, 10.2514/3.46134.
28. Rood E. Anthony D. Tail profile effects on unsteady large scale flow structure in the wing and plate junction. 1985, and ASME Fluids Engineering Division.
29. Ross J. Vogel J. Corsiglia V. Full-scale wind tunnel study of wing fuselage interaction and comparison with paneling method. 1981, and AIAA Paper No. 81-1666.
30. Rifki R. Khan J. Ahmed A. Bangash Z. Effect of the aspect ratio on the flow field on surface mounted obstacles. 2005, and AIAA Paper No. 2005-4848.
31. Simpson R. Junction flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2001, 33:415. ARVFA3, 0066-4189, 10.1146/annurev.fluid.33.1.415.
32. Vassberg J. Sclafani A. DeHaan M. A wing-body fairing design for the DLR-F6 model: A DPW-III case study. 2005, and AIAA Paper No. 2005-4730.
33. Wood D. Westphal R. Measurements of the flow around a lifting wing/body junction. AIAA J. 1992, 30:6. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.10875.
34. Tinoco E. DLR F6-FX2B summary. 2006, Third CFD Drag Prediction Workshop.
35. Baker C.J. The laminar horseshoe vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 1979, 95:347. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112079001506.
36. Khan M. Ahmed A. Trosper R. Dynamics of the juncture vortex. AIAA J. 1995, 33:1273. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.12550.
37. Wang J. Bi W. Wei Q. Effects of an upstream inclined rod on the circular cylinder-flat plate junction flow. Exp. Fluids 2009, 46:1093. EXFLDU, 0723-4864, 10.1007/s00348-009-0619-4.
38. Lin C. Lai W.-J. Chang K.-A. Simultaneous particle image velocimetry and laser Doppler velocimetry measurements of periodical oscillatory horseshoe vortex system near square cylinder-base plate juncture. J. Eng. Mech. 2003, 129:1173. JENMDT, 0733-9399, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:10(1173).
39. Lin C. Chiu P. Shieh S. Characteristics of horseshoe vortex system near a vertical plate-base plate juncture. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2002, 27:25. ETFSEO, 0894-1777, 10.1016/S0894-1777(02)00215-7.
40. Seal C. Smith C. Rockwell D. Dynamics of the vorticity distribution in endwall junctions. AIAA J. 1997, 35:1041. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/2.192.
41. Fleming J. Simpson R. Devenport W. An experimental study of a turbulent wing-body junction and wake flow. 1991, and Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Departement, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Technical Report No. VPI-AOE-179.
42. Kim S. Walker D. Simpson R. Observation and measurements of flow structures in the stagnation region of a wing body junction. 1991, and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Technical Report No. VPI-E-91-20.
43. Devenport W. Agarwal N. Dewitz M. Simpson R. Poddar K. Effects of a fillet on the flow past a wing-body junction. AIAA J. 1990, 28:2017. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.10517.
44. Apsley D. Leschziner M. Investigation of advanced turbulence models for the flow in a generic wing/body junction. Flow, Turbul. Combust. 2001, 67:25. FTCOF9, 1386-6184, 10.1023/A:1013598401276.
45. Bain J. Fletcher C. Predictions of generic wing body junction flow behaviour. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1993, 50:19. JWEAD6, 0167-6105, 10.1016/0167-6105(93)90057-U.
46. Bonnin J. Buchal T. Rodi W. ERCOFTAC workshop on data bases and testing of calculation methods for turbulent flows. 1996, and ERCOFTAC Bulletin No. 28.
47. Briley W. McDonald H. Computation of turbulent horseshoe vortex past swept and unswept wing body junctions. 1982, and Scientific Research Associates, Inc. Technical Report No. SRA R 82-920001 F.
48. Chen H. Assessment of a Reynolds stress closure model for appendage/hull junction flows. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 1995, 117:557. JFEGA4, 0098-2202, 10.1115/1.2817301.
49. Gorski J. Govindan T. Lakshminarayana B. Computation of three-dimensional turbulent shear flows in corners. AIAA J. 1985, 23:685. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.8971.
50. Hemsch M. Morrison J. Statistical analysis of CFD solutions from 2nd drag prediction workshop. 2004, and AIAA Paper No. 2004-0556.
51. Jones D. Clarke D. Simulation of a wing body junction experiment using the fluent code. 2005, and Australian Government Defence Department Technical Report No. DTSO-TR-1731.
52. Paciorri R. Bonfiglioni A. Di Mascio A. Favini B. RANS simulation of a junction flow. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2005, 19:179. IJCFEC, 1061-8562, 10.1080/10618560410001729126.
53. Parneix S. Durbin P. Behnia M. Computation of 3D turbulent boundary layers using the V2langf model. Flow, Turbul. Combust. 1998, 60:19. FTCOF9, 1386-6184, 10.1023/A:1009986925097.
54. Smith F. Gajjar J. Flow past wing body junctions. J. Fluid Mech. 1984, 144:191. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112084001579.
55. Paik J. Escauriaza C. Sotiropoulos F. On the bimodal dynamics of the turbulent horseshoe vortex system in a wing body type junction. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19:045107. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.2716813.
56. Fu S. Xiao Z. Chen H. Zhang Y. Huang J. Simulation of wing-body junction flows with hybrid RANS/LES methods. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2007, 28:1379. IJHFD2, 0142-727X, 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2007.05.007.
57. Alin N. Fureby C. Large eddy simulation of junction vortex flows. 2008, and AIAA Paper No. 2008-668.
58. Wong J. Png E. Numerical investigation of the wing body junction vortex using various large eddy simulation models. 2009, and AIAA Paper No. 2009-4159.
59. Langtry R. Kuntz M. Menter F. Drag prediction of engine-airframe interference effects with CFX-5. J. Aircr. 2005, 42:1523. JAIRAM, 0021-8669, 10.2514/1.12728.
60. Gand F. Brunet V. Deck S. A combined experimental, RANS and LES investigation of a wing body junction flow. 2010, and AIAA Paper No. 2010-4753.
61. Brion V. Stabilité des paires de tourbillons contra-rotatifs: Application au tourbillon de jeu dans les turbomachines. 2009, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique, Spécialité Mécanique.
62. Mary I. Sagaut P. Large eddy simulation of flow around an airfoil near stall. AIAA J. 2002, 40:1139. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/2.1763.
63. Pamiès M. Weiss P.-E. Garnier E. Deck S. Sagaut P. Generation of synthetic turbulent inflow data for large eddy simulation of spatially evolving wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 2009, 21:045103. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.3103881.
64. Simon F. Deck S. Guillen P. Sagaut P. Merlen A. Numerical simulation of the compressible mixing layer past an axisymmetric trailing edge. J. Fluid Mech. 2007, 591:215. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112007008129.
65. Deck S. Thorigny P. Unsteadiness of an axisymmetric separating-reattaching flow: Numerical investigation. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19:065103. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.2734996.
66. Weiss P. Deck S. Robinet J. Sagaut P. On the dynamics of axisymmetric turbulent separating/reattaching flows. Phys. Fluids 2009, 21:075103. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.3177352.
67. Pamiès M. Garnier E. Merlen A. Sagaut P. Response of a spatially developing turbulent boundary layer to active control strategies in the framework of opposition control. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19:108102. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.2771659.
68. Dandois J. Garnier E. Sagaut P. Numerical simulation of active separation control by a synthetic jet. J. Fluid Mech. 2007, 574:25. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112006003995.
69. Péchier M. Guillen P. Caysac R. Magnus effect over finned projectiles. J. Spacecr. Rockets 2001, 38:542. JSCRAG, 0022-4650, 10.2514/2.3714.
70. Lenormand E. Sagaut P. Ta Phuoc L. Comte P. Subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulations of compressible wall bounded flows. AIAA J. 2000, 38:1340. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/2.1133.
71. Jarrin N. Benhamadouche S. Laurence D. Prosser R. A synthetic-eddy-method for generating inflow conditions for large-eddy simulations. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2006, 27:585. IJHFD2, 0142-727X, 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2006.02.006.
72. Sagaut P. Deck S. Terracol M. Multiscale and Multiresolution Approaches in Turbulence 2006, 10.1142/9781860948978, and (Imperial College Press, London, ).
73. Sagaut P. Deck S. Large eddy simulation for aerodynamics: status and perspectives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 2009, 367:2849. PTRMAD, 0962-8428, 10.1098/rsta.2008.0269.
74. De Graaff D. Eaton J. Reynolds number scaling of the flat plate turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 2000, 422:319. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112000001713.
75. Drela M. Giles M. Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low Reynolds number airfoils. AIAA J. 1987, 25:1347. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.9789.
76. Burg J. Maximum Entropy Spectral Analysis 1978, (IEEE, New York, ).
77. Welch P. The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short modified periodograms. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 1967, 15:70. ITADAS, 0018-9278, 10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901.
78. Lumley J. Newman G. The return to isotropy of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 1977, 82:161. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112077000585.
79. Deck S. Weiss P. Pamiès M. Garnier E. On the use of stimulated detached eddy simulation (SDES) on spatially developing boundary layers. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design 2008, and edited by S.-H. Peng and W. Haase, (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Vol. 97, pp. 67-76.