An accessible verification environment for UML models of services

Journal of Symbolic Computation

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 119-149

  Banti, Federico ^a   Pugliese, Rosario ^a   Tiezzi, Francesco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

CASE tools; Formal methods; Model checking; Process calculi; Service oriented architectures; UML

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649451912     PISSN: 07477171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsc.2010.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Arons T., Hooman J., Kugler H., Pnueli A., van der Zwaag M. Deductive verification of UML models in TLPVS. LNCS 2004, 335-349. Springer.
2. Banti F., Lapadula A., Pugliese R., Tiezzi F. Specification and analysis of SOC systems using COWS: a finance case study. ENTCS 2009, 71-105. Elsevier.
3. Banti, F., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F., 2009b. Towards a Framework for the Verification of UML Models of Services. In: WWV.
4. Bartoletti M., Degano P., Ferrari G.L., Zunino R. Semantics-Based Design for Secure Web Services. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 2008, 34(1):33-49.
5. Bauer J., Nielson F., Nielson H., Pilegaard H. Relational analysis of correlation. LNCS 2008, 32-46. Springer.
6. Beato M.E., Barrio-Solrzano M., Cuesta C.E., de la Fuente P. UML automatic verification tool with formal methods. ENTCS 2005, 127(4):3-16.
7. Bocchi L., Laneve C., Zavattaro G. A calculus for long-running transactions. LNCS 2003, 124-138. Springer.
8. Boreale M., Bruni R., De Nicola R., Loreti M. Sessions and pipelines for structured service programming. LNCS 2008, vol. 5051:19-38. Springer.
9. Butler M., Hoare C., Ferreira C. A trace semantics for long-running transactions. LNCS 2005, vol. 3525:133-150. Springer.
10. Carbone M., Honda K., Yoshida N. Structured communication-centred programming for web services. LNCS 2007, 2-17. Springer.
11. Clarke E., Emerson E. Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching-time temporal logic. LNCS 1981, vol. 131:52-71. Springer.
12. Clarke E., Grumberg O., Peled D. Model Checking 1999, MIT Press.
13. Compton, K., Gurevich, Y., Huggins, J., Shen, W., 2000. An Automatic Verification Tool for UML. Tech. rep., Dept. of EECS, University of Michigan.
14. Crane M., Dingel J. Towards a UML virtual machine: implementing an interpreter for UML 2 actions and activities. CASCON 2008, 96-110. ACM.
15. Csertán, G., Huszerl, G., Majzik, I., Pap, Z., Pataricza, A., Varró, D., 2002. VIATRA - visual automated transformations for formal verification and validation of UML models. In: ASE. IEEE, pp. 267-270.
16. De Nicola, R., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M., 2010. SoSL: service oriented stochastic logic. In: M. Wirsing and M. Hölzl (eds.), Rigorous Software Engineering for Service-Oriented Systems - Results of the SENSORIA Project on Software Engineering for Service-Oriented Computing. Springer (in press).
17. De Nicola R., Vaandrager F. Action versus state based logics for transition systems. LNCS 1990, vol. 469:407-419. Springer.
18. De Nicola R., Vaandrager F. Three logics for branching bisimulation. Journal of the ACM 1995, 42(2):458-487.
19. Dong W., Wang J., Qi X., Qi Z. Model checking UML statecharts. APSEC 2001, 363-370. IEEE.
20. Eichner C., Fleischhack H., Meyer R., Schrimpf U., Stehno C. Compositional semantics for UML 2.0 sequence diagrams using petri nets. LNCS 2005, vol. 3530:133-148. Springer.
21. Fantechi A., Gnesi S., Lapadula A., Mazzanti F., Pugliese R., Tiezzi F. A model checking approach for verifying COWSspecifications. LNCS 2008, vol. 4961:230-245. Springer.
22. Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S., Lapadula, A., Mazzanti, F., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F., 2010. A logical verification methodology for service-oriented computing. Tech. Rep., DSI, Università di Firenze. Available at:. http://rap.dsi.unifi.it/cows/papers/cows_logic_full.pdf.
23. Ferrari G., Guanciale R., Strollo D. Event based service coordination over dynamic and heterogeneous networks. LNCS 2006, vol. 4294:453-458. Springer.
24. Geguang P., Xiangpeng Z., Shuling W., Zongyan Q. Towards the semantics and verification of BPEL4WS. ENTCS 2005, vol. 151/2:33-52. Elsevier.
25. 25 years of model checking - history, achievements, perspectives. LNCS 2008, vol. 5000. Springer. O. Grumberg, H. Veith (Eds.).
26. Guidi C., Lucchi R., Gorrieri R., Busi N., Zavattaro G. SOCK: a calculus for service oriented computing. LNCS 2006, 327-338. Springer.
27. Holzmann G. The Spin Model Checker - Primer and Reference Manual 2003, Addison-Wesley.
28. Huth M., Ryan M. Logic in Computer Science: Modelling and Reasoning About Systems 2004, Cambridge University Press.
29. Jürjens J., Shabalin P. Automated verification of UMLsec models for security requirements. LNCS 2004, vol. 3273:365-379. Springer.
30. Knapp A., Merz S., Rauh C. Model checking - timed UML state machines and collaborations. LNCS 2002, 395-416. Springer.
31. Lanese I., Martins F., Ravara A., Vasconcelos V. Disciplining orchestration and conversation in service-oriented computing. SEFM 2007, 305-314. IEEE.
32. Lapadula A., Pugliese R., Tiezzi F. A calculus for orchestration of web services. LNCS 2007, 33-47. Springer, full version available at: http://rap.dsi.unifi.it/cows/papers/cows-esop07-full.pdf.
33. Lapadula A., Pugliese R., Tiezzi F. Regulating data exchange in service oriented applications. LNCS 2007, 223-239. Springer.
34. Lapadula A., Pugliese R., Tiezzi F. A formal account of WS-BPEL. LNCS 2008, 199-215. Springer.
35. Latella D., Majzik I., Massink M. Automatic verification of a behavioural subset of UML statechart diagrams using the SPIN model-checker. Formal Asp. Comput. 1999, 11(6):637-664.
36. Latella D., Massink M. A formal testing framework for UML statechart diagrams behaviours: from theory to automatic verification. HASE 2001, 11-22. IEEE.
37. Mayer, P., Koch, N., Schroeder, A., 2008a. The UML4SOAprofile (version 1.2). Available at: http://www.uml4soa.eu/profile.
38. Mayer P., Schroeder A., Koch N. Mdd4soa: model-driven service orchestration. EDOC 2008, 203-212. IEEE.
39. Meolic R., Kapus T., Brezocnik Z. ACTLW - an action-based computation tree logic with unless operator. Elsevier Information Sciences 2008, 178(6):1542-1557.
40. Milner R., Parrow J., Walker D. A calculus of mobile processes, I and II. Information and Computation 1992, 100(1):1-40. 41-77.
41. No Magic Inc., 2009. MagicDraw UML academic personal edition 16.5. Available at: http://www.magicdraw.com/.
42. OASIS WSBPEL TC, April 2007. Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. Tech. rep., OASIS.
43. Object Management Group, 2007a. Unified Modeling Language (UML), version 2.1.2.
44. Object Management Group, 2007b. XMI Mapping Specification, v2.1.1.
45. Object Management Group, 2008. Sevice oriented architecture Modeling Language (SoaML) - Specification for the UML Profile and Metamodel for Services (UPMS).
46. Prandi D., Quaglia P. Stochastic COWS. LNCS 2007, vol. 4749:245-256. Springer.
47. Störrle H., Hausmann J. Towards a Formal Semantics of UML 2.0 Activities. LNI 2005, 117-128. GI.
48. Sun Microsystems, 2009. The Swing Tutorial. Available at: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing.
49. Tabuchi N., Sato N., Nakamura H. Model-driven performance analysis of UML design models based on stochastic process algebra. LNCS 2005, vol. 3748:41-58. Springer.
50. ter Beek M., Gnesi S., Mazzanti F. Formal verification of an automotive scenario in service-oriented computing. ICSE 2008, 613-622. ACM.
51. Varró D., et al. Transformation of UML models to CSP: a case study for graph transformation tools. LNCS 2008, vol. 5088:540-565. Springer.
52. VIATRA2 Developer Team, 2009. VIATRA2 Project Overview. Available at: http://eclipse.org/gmt/VIATRA2/.
53. Vieira H., Caires L., Seco J.C. The conversation calculus: a model of service-oriented computation. LNCS 2008, vol. 4960:269-283. Springer.