Analysis of spinopelvic parameters in lumbar degenerative kyphosis: Correlation with spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 24, 2010, Pages

  Lee, Jung Hee ^a   Kim, Ki Tack ^a   Suk, Kyung Soo ^a   Lee, Sang Hun ^a   Jeong, Bi O ^a   Kim, Jin Soo ^a   Eoh, Jae Hyung ^a   Kim, Young Jun ^a  

^a Kyung Hee University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

lumbar degenerative kyphosis; pelvic incidence; pelvic tilt; sacral slope

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE KYPHOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINOPELVIC PARAMETER; SPONDYLOLYTIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STUDENT T TEST; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIC BONES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; SPINAL STENOSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649450980     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e88be6     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Farfan HF, Huberdeau RM, Dubow HI. Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: the influence of geometrical features on the pattern of disc degener-ation\a post mortem study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972;54:492-510.
2. Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH. Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 1989;14:717-21.
3. Jackson RP, McManus AC. Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size: a prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 1994;19:1611-8.
4. Duval-Beaupere G, Robain G. Visualization on full spine radiographs of the anatomical connections of the centres of the segmental body mass supported by each vertebra and measured in vivo. Int Orthop 1987;11:261-9.
5. Gracovetsky S, Farfan H. The optimum spine. Spine 1986;11:543-73.
6. Farcy JP, Schwab FJ. Management of flatback and related kyphotic decompensation syndromes. Spine 1997;22:2452-7.
7. Schwab FJ, Farcy JP, Roye DP Jr. The sagittal pelvic tilt index as a criterion in the evaluation of spondylolisthesis. Preliminary observations. Spine 1997; 22:1661-7.
8. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, et al. The association of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in asymptomatic persons and patients with isthmic spon-dylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:24-30.
9. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. Spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, and spinopelvic balance: a correlation study. Spine 2004;29:2049-54.
10. Barrey C, Jund J, Perrin G, et al. Spinopelvic alignment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 2007;61:981-6; discussion 986.
11. Hanson DS, Bridwell KH, Rhee JM, et al. Correlation of pelvic incidence with low-and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 2002;27:2026-9.
12. Goel VK, Kong W, Han JS, et al. A combinedfinite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles. Spine 1993;18:1531-41.
13. Granata KP, Marras WS. Cost-benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability. Spine 2000;25:1398-404.
14. Keller TS, Colloca CJ, Harrison DE, et al. Muscular contributions to dynamic dorsoventral lumbar spine stiffness. Eur Spine J 2007;16:245-54.
15. Quint U, Wilke HJ, Shirazi-Adl A, et al. Importance of the intersegmental trunk muscles for the stability of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical study in vitro. Spine 1998;23:1937-45.
16. Gedalia U, Solomonow M, Zhou BH, et al. Biomechanics of increased exposure to lumbar injury caused by cyclic loading. Part 2: recovery of reflexive muscular stability with rest. Spine 1999;24:2461-7.
17. Takemitsu Y, Harada Y, Iwahara T, et al. Lumbar degenerative kyphosis. Clinical, radiological and epidemiological studies. Spine 1988;13:1317-26.
18. Lee CS, Lee CK, Kim YT, et al. Dynamic sagittal imbalance of the spine in degenerative flat back: significance of pelvic tilt in surgical treatment. Spine 2001;26:2029-35.
19. Marchetti PG, Bartolozzi P. Classification of spondylolisthesis as a guideline for treatment. In: Bridwell KW, de Wald RI, eds. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Raven Publishers; 1997.
20. Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, et al. Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36 radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine 2005;30:427-33.
21. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998;7:99-103.
22. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 1999;24:1712-20.
23. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Rinella A, et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86(suppl 1):44-50.
24. Kostuik JP, Maurais GR, Richardson WJ, et al. Combined single stage anterior and posterior osteotomy for correction of iatrogenic lumbar kyphosis. Spine 1988;13:257-66.
25. Lagrone MO, Bradford DS, Moe JH, et al. Treatment of symptomatic flat-back after spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:569-80.
26. Doherty JH. Complications of fusion in lumbar scoliosis. In Proceedings of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55:438.
27. Bradford DS, Schumacher WL, Lonstein JE, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis: experience in surgical management of 21 patients. Spine 1987;12:238-43.
28. Milne JS, Lauder IJ. Age effects in kyphosis and lordosis in adults. Ann Hum Biol 1974;1:327-37.
29. Graf H, Hecquet J, Dubousset J. 3-dimensional approach to spinal deformities. Application to the study of the prognosis of pediatric scoliosis [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1983;69:407-16.
30. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, et al. Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:40-7.
31. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, et al. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 2005;30:346-53.
32. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, et al. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of ky-phosis and lordosis. Spine 1982;7:335-42.
33. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, et al. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 1998;23:1750-67.
34. Jang JS, Lee SH, Min JH, et al. Influence of lumbar lordosis restoration on thoracic curve and sagittal position in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients. Spine 2009;34:280-4.
35. Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 2001;10:314-9.
36. Voutsinas SA, MacEwen GD. Sagittal profiles of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986:235-42.
37. Hasday CA, Passoff TL, Perry J. Gait abnormalities arising from latrogenic loss of lumbar lordosis secondary to Harrington instrumentation in lumbar fractures. Spine 1983;8:501-11.