Membrane characterization by dynamic hysteresis: Measurements, mechanisms, and implications for membrane fouling

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 366, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 17-24

  Lee, Sangyoup ^a   Lee, Eunsu ^a   Elimelech, Menachem ^b   Hong, Seungkwan ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Charge distribution; Dynamic hysteresis; Membrane fouling; RO membrane; Surface heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL HETEROGENEITIES; CHEMICAL SURFACES; DYNAMIC HYSTERESIS; FOULANTS; MEMBRANE CHARACTERIZATION; MEMBRANE DYNAMICS; MEMBRANE SURFACE; RO MEMBRANE; SOLUTION CHEMISTRY; SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS; SURFACE HETEROGENEITY; TEST SOLUTIONS; WILHELMY PLATE;

CHARGE DISTRIBUTION; CHARGED PARTICLES; HYSTERESIS; MEMBRANE FOULING; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; ZETA POTENTIAL;

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; HYSTERESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 78649450007     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.024     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jucker C., Clark M.M. Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 97:37-52.
2. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 119:253-268.
3. Ho C.-C., Zydney A.L. Effect of membrane morphology on the initial rate of protein fouling during microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 155:261-275.
4. Shim Y., Lee H.J., Lee S., Moon S.H., Cho J. Effects of natural organic matter and ionic species on membrane surface charge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:3864-3871.
5. Al-Jeshi S., Neville A. An investigation into the relationship between flux and roughness on RO membranes using scanning probe microscopy. Desalination 2006, 189:221-228.
6. Lee S., Elimelech M. Relating organic fouling of reverse osmosis membranes to intermolecular adhesion forces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:980-987.
7. Boussu K., Belpaire A., Volodin A., Van Haesendonck C., Van der Meeren P., Vandecasteele C., Van der Bruggen B. Influence of membrane and colloid characteristics on fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 280:220-230.
8. Pieracci J., Crivello J.V., Belfort G. Photochemical modification of 10kDa polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes for reduction of biofouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 156:223-240.
9. Freger V., Gilron J., Belfer S. TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FT-IR/AFM/TEM study. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 209:283-292.
10. Belfer S., Fainshtain R., Purinson Y., Gilron J., Nyström M., Mänttäri M. Modification of NF membrane properties by in situ redox initiated graft polymerization with hydrophilic monomers. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 239:55-64.
11. Liu L.-F., Yu S.-C., Zhou Y., Gao C.-J. Study on a novel polyamide-urea reverse osmosis composite membrane (ICIC-MPD). I. Preparation and characterization of ICIC-MPD membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:88-94.
12. Tarboush B.J.A., Rana D., Matsuura T., Arafat H.A., Narbaitz R.M. Preparation of thin-film-composite polyamide membranes for desalination using novel hydrophilic surface modifying macromolecules. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:166-175.
13. 2 nanoparticle self-assembly membrane with improved fouling resistance. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 326:659-666.
14. Yang J., Lee S., Lee E., Lee J., Hong S.K. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface property of reverse osmosis membranes under seawater conditions. Desalination 2009, 247:148-161.
15. Childress A.E., Shivaji S., Deshmukh Effect of humic substances and anionic surfactants on the surface charge and performance of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 1998, 118:167-174.
16. Hoek E.M.V., Bhattacharjee S., Elimelech M. Effect of membrane surface roughness on colloid-membrane DLVO interactions. Langmuir 2003, 19:4836-4847.
17. Brant J.A., Johnson K.M., Childress A.E. Examining the electrochemical properties of a nanofiltration membrane with atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 276:286-294.
18. Lee E., Lee S., Hong S.K. A new approach to the characterization of reverse osmosis membrane by dynamic hysteresis. Desalinat. Water Treat. 2010, 18:257-263.
19. Rupp F., Scheideler L., Geis-Gerstorfer J. Effect of heterogenic surfaces on contact angle hysteresis: dynamic contact angle analysis in material sciences. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2002, 25:9-15.
20. Kasemura T., Takahashi S., Nakane N., Maegawa T. Surface dynamics for poly (vinyl alkylates) via dynamic contact angle and adhesion tension relaxation. Polymer 1996, 37:3659-3664.
21. 2. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 211:28-38.
22. Keller A.A., Broje V., Setty K. Effect of advancing velocity and fluid viscosity on the dynamic contact angle of petroleum hydrocarbons. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2007, 58:201-206.
23. Xie X., Morrow N.R., Buckley J.S. Contact angle hysteresis and the stability of wetting changes induced by adsorption from crude oil. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2002, 33:147-159.
24. Gaudin A.M., Decker T.G. Contact angles and adsorption in the system quartz water-dodecane modified by dodecyl ammonium chloride. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1967, 24:151-158.
25. Nabe A., Staude E., Belfort G. Surface modification of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes and fouling by BSA solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 133:57-72.
26. Kamusewitz H., Possart W., Paul D. The relation between Young's equilibrium contact angle and the hysteresis on rough paraffin wax surfaces. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 1999, 156:271-279.
27. Lee S.-H., Lee C.-S., Shin D.-S., Kim B.-G., Lee Y.-S., Kim Y.-K. Micro protein patterning using a lift-off process with fluorocarbon thin film. Sens. Actuators B 2004, 99:623-632.
28. Brunot C., Grosgogeat B., Picart C., Lagneau C., Jaffrezic-Renault N., Ponsonnet L. Response of fibroblast activity and polyelectrolyte multilayer films coating titanium. Dent. Mater. 2008, 24:1025-1035.
29. Marmur A. Equilibrium contact angles: theory and measurement. Colloid Surf. A 1996, 116:55-61.
30. Luxbacher T. Electrokinetic characterization of flat sheet membranes by streaming current measurement. Desalination 2006, 199:376-377.
31. Fairbrother F., Mastin H. Studies in electro-endosmosis. Part I. J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 1924, 125:2319-2330.
32. K.J. Stout, P.J. Sullivan, W.P. Dong, E. Mainsah, N. Luo, T. Mathia, H. Zahouani, The development of methods for the characterization of roughness on three dimensions. Publication no. EUR 15178 EN of the Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1994.
33. Yu Y., Lee S., Hong S.K. Effect of solution chemistry on organic fouling of reverse osmosis membranes in seawater desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 351:205-213.
34. Morra M., Occhiello E., Garbassi F. On the wettability of poly (2-hydroxyrthylmethacrylate). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1992, 149:1.