NF/RO faujasite zeolite membrane-ammonia absorption solvent hybrid system for potential post-combustion CO2 capture application

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 366, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 220-228

  Li, Xiansen ^a   Remias, Joseph E ^a   Neathery, James K ^a   Liu, Kunlei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

CO2 scrubbing solvent; FAU structure; NF RO process; Zeolite membrane

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA ABSORPTION; AMMONIA WATER; AQUEOUS AMMONIA; CARBON RICH; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; CLOSE-IN; CO2 SCRUBBING SOLVENT; CRYSTALLINITIES; ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS; ENERGY DISPERSIVE X RAY SPECTROSCOPY; FAU STRUCTURE; FAU ZEOLITES; FAU-TYPE ZEOLITE; FAUJASITE ZEOLITES; GEL PRECURSORS; HYBRID PROCESS; NF/RO PROCESS; NOVEL CONCEPT; PERMEATION FLUXES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; POST-COMBUSTION; POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS; SCRUBBING SOLUTION; SECONDARY GROWTH; SELECTIVE MEMBRANES; SEM; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; STRUCTURE DIRECTING AGENTS; TOTAL CARBON; X RAY DIFFRACTOMETERS; X-RAY FLUORESCENT SPECTROSCOPY; ZEOLITE MEMBRANE;

ABSORPTION; ALKALINITY; AMMONIA; CALCINATION; COMBUSTION; ELECTROLYTES; GELS; HYBRID SYSTEMS; ION EXCHANGE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SILICATE MINERALS; SOLVENTS; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; X RAY SPECTROSCOPY; X RAYS;

ION EXCHANGE MEMBRANES;

AMMONIA; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; ELECTROLYTE; WATER; ZEOLITE;

ABSORPTION; ALKALINITY; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMBUSTION; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; HYBRID; NANOFILTRATION; PRECURSOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ROENTGEN SPECTROSCOPY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WATER CONTENT; X RAY DIFFRACTION; X RAY FLUORESCENCE;

EID: 78649448003     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Leaf D., Verolmec H.J.H., Hunt W.F. Overview of regulatory/policy/economic issues related to carbon dioxide. Environ. Int. 2003, 29:303-310.
2. R.K. Pachauri, A. Reisinger (Eds.), IPCC 2007, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
3. 2 absorption into aqueous ammonia. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2008, 43:766-777.
4. 2 greenhouse gas by ammonia scrubbing. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36:2490-2493.
5. 2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:4467-4475.
6. van Loo S., van Elk E.P., Versteeg G.F. The removal of carbon dioxide with activated solutions of methyl-diethanol-amine. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2007, 55:135-145.
7. 2 on selected model surfaces. Catal. Today 2009, 148:212-220.
8. Sweeney B., Sceats M. Calix-a carbon capture breakthrough. Carbon Capture J. 2009, 12:19-21.
9. 2 capture by carbon fiber monolithic adsorbents. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2009, 35:438-455.
10. 2 capture. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2008, 111:478-487.
11. 2 post-combustion capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption using 13X and 5A zeolites. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:209-215.
12. 2 "molecular baske" adsorbents. Inter. J. Environ. Technol. Manag. 2004, 4:32-52.
13. Britt D., Furukawa H., Wang B., Glover T.G., Yaghi O.M. Highly efficient separation of carbon dioxide by a metal-organic framework replete with open metal sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:20637-20640.
14. Furukawa H., Yaghi O.M. Storage of hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide in highly porous covalent organic frameworks for clean energy applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131:8875-8883.
15. 2 gas separation membrane processes for post-combustion capture. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:284-294.
16. Hagewiesche D.P., Ashour S.S., Al-Ghawas H.A., Sandall O.C. Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous blends of monoethanolamine and N-methyldiethanolamine. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50:1071-1079.
17. 2 capture and storage: closing the knowing-doing gap. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2006, 84:739-763.
18. 2 separation on the efficiency of a coal-fired power plant. Energy 2010, 35:841-850.
19. 2-capture process advances toward commercialization. Power 2008, 152(2):38-41.
20. Noack M., Kolsch P., Schafer R., Toussaint P., Caro J. Molecular sieve membranes for industrial application: problems, progress, solutions. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2002, 25:221-230.
21. Kondo M., Komori M., Kita H., Okamoto K. Tubular-type pervaporation module with zeolite NaA membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 133:133-141.
22. Sommer S., Melin T. Influence of operation parameters on the separation of mixtures by pervaporation and vapor permeation with inorganic membranes. Part 1: Dehydration of solvents. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60:4509-4523.
23. Sommer S., Melin T. Influence of operation parameters on the separation of mixtures by pervaporation and vapor permeation with inorganic membranes. Part 2: Purely organic systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60:4525-4533.
24. 4 separations. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18:2601-2603.
25. Lai Z., Bonilla G., Diaz I., Nery J.G., Sujaoti K., Amat M.A., Kokkoli E., Terasaki O., Thompson R.W., Tsapatsis M., Vlachos D.G. Microstructural optimization of a zeolite membrane for organic vapor separation. Science 2003, 300:456-460.
26. 3. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2008, 112:88-96.
27. Li L., Dong J., Nenoff T.M., Lee R. Desalination by reverse osmosis using MFI zeolite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243:401-404.
28. Li L., Dong J., Nenoff T.M., Lee R. Reverse osmosis of ionic aqueous solutions on an MFI zeolite membrane. Desalination 2004, 170:309-316.
29. Lu J., Liu N., Li L., Lee R. Organic fouling and regeneration of zeolite membrane in wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 72:203-207.
30. Li L., Liu N., McPherson B., Lee R. Influence of counter ions on the reverse osmosis through MFI zeolite membranes: implications for produced water desalination. Desalination 2008, 228:217-225.
31. Covarrubias C., Garcia R., Arriagada R., Yanez J., Ramanan H., Lai Z., Tsapatsis M. Removal of trivalent chromium contaminant from aqueous media using FAU-type zeolite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 312:163-173.
32. Kazemimoghadam M. New nanopore zeolite membranes for water treatment. Desalination 2010, 251:176-180.
33. Chowdhury S.R., Lamare J.D., Valtchev V. Synthesis and structural characterization of EMT-type membranes and their performance in nanofiltration experiments. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 314:200-205.
34. 2 mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44:937-944.
35. Kita H., Inoue T., Asamura H., Tanaka K., Okamoto K. NaY zeolite membrane for the pervaporation separation of methanol-methyl tert-butyl ether mixtures. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1:45-46.
36. Kusakabe K., Kuroda T., Morooka S. Separation of carbon dioxide from nitrogen using ion-exchanged faujasite-type zeolite membranes formed on porous support tubes. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 148:13-23.
37. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis: Introduction to Zeolite Science and Practice, 2nd Completely Revised and Expanded Edition 2001, 364. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. H. van Bekkum, E.M. Flanigen, P.A. Jacobs, J.C. Jansen (Eds.).
38. Fan W., Shirato S., Gao F., Ogura M., Okubo T. Phase selection of FAU and LTA zeolites by controlling synthesis parameters. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2006, 89:227-234.
39. 2O. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2006, 87:261-267.
40. Wang Z., Yan Y. Oriented zeolite MFI monolayer films on metal substrates by in situ crystallization. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2001, 48:229-238.
41. Holmberg B.A., Wang H., Yan Y. High silica zeolite Y nanocrystals by dealumination and direct synthesis. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2004, 74:189-198.
42. Bellat J.-P., Paulin C., Jeffroy M., Boutin A., Paillaud J.-L., Patarin J., Lella A.D., Fuchs A. Unusual hysteresis loop in the adsorption-desorption of water in NaY zeolite at very low pressure. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113:8287-8295.
43. Bouchoux A., Balmann H.R., Lutin F. Investigation of nanofiltration as a purification step for lactic acid production processes based on conventional and bipolar electrodialysis operations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 52:266-273.
44. Peeters J.M.M., Mulder M.H.V., Strathmann H. Streaming potential measurements as a characterization method for nanofiltration membranes. Colloids Surf. A 1999, 150:247-259.
45. Luo J., Wei S., Su Y., Chen X., Wan Y. Desalination and recovery of iminodiacetic acid (IDA) from its sodium chloride mixtures by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342:35-41.
46. Vonk M.W., Smith J.A.M. Positive and negative ion retention curves of mixed electrolytes in reverse osmosis with a cellulose acetate membrane. An analysis on the basis of the generalized Nernst-Planck equation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1983, 96:121-134.
47. Tsuru T., Urairi M., Nakao S.-I., Kimura S. Negative rejection of anions in the loose reverse osmosis separation of mono- and di-valent ion mixtures. Desalination 1991, 81:219-227.
48. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34:3710-3716.
49. Dresner L. Some remarks on the integration of the extended Nernst-Planck equations in the hyperfiltration of multicomponent solutions. Desalination 1972, 10:27-46.
50. Nielsen D.W., Jonsson G. Bulk-phase criteria for negative ion rejection in nanofiltration of multicomponent salt solutions. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1994, 29:1165-1182.
51. Hagmeyer G., Gimbel R. Modelling the rejection of nanofiltration membranes using zeta potential measurements. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1999, 15:19-30.