Delineating an exurban development footprint using SPOT imagery and ancillary data

Applied Geography

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 171-180

  Shrestha, Namrata ^a   Conway, Tenley M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Exurban; NDVI; Ontario; Post classification processing; SPOT 5

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DATA PROCESSING; NDVI; PIXEL; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL DATA; SPOT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA]; PETERBOROUGH [ONTARIO];

EID: 78649446438     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Benediktsson J.A., Pesaresi M., Arnason K. Classification and feature extraction for remote sensing images from urban areas based on morphological transformations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2003, 41:1940-1949.
2. Bhatta B., Saraswati S., Bandyopadhyay D. Quantifying the degree-of-freedom, degree-of-sprawl, and degree-of-goodness of urban growth from remote sensing data. Applied Geography 2010, 30(1):96-111.
3. Brown D.G., Johnson K.M., Loveland T.R., Theobald D.M. Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States 1950-2000. Ecological Applications 2005, 15:1851-1863.
4. Campbell J.B. Introduction to remote sensing 2007, The Guilford Press, New York.
5. Chander G., Markham B. Revised landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and postcalibration dynamic ranges. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2003, 41:2674-2677.
6. Chavez P.S. Atmospheric, solar, and M.T.F. corrections for ERTS digital imagery, Proc. American Society of Photogrammetry Fall Conference 1975, Arizona, Phoenix, p. 69.
7. Chavez P.S. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1988, 24:459-479.
8. Congalton R. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1991, 37:35-46.
9. Cova T.J., Sutton P.C., Theobald D.M. Exurban change detection in fire-prone areas with nighttime satellite imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2004, 70:1249-1257.
10. Eyton J.R. Urban land use classification and modeling using cover-type frequencies. Applied Geography 1993, 13(2):111-121.
11. Gao J., Skillcorn D. Capability of SPOT XS data in producing detailed land cover maps at the urban-rural periphery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1998, 19:2877-2891.
12. Griffiths G.H. Monitoring urban change from landsat TM and SPOT satellite imagery by image differencing. Proceedings of IGARSS '88 Symposium 1988, 493-497. Edinburgh IEEE, Piscataway, NJ.
13. Groom G.B., Fuller R.M., Jones A.R. Contextual correction: techniques for improving land cover mapping from remotely sensed images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1996, 17:69-89.
14. Gude P.H., Hansen A.J., Rasker R., Maxwell B. Rates and drivers of rural residential development in the Greater Yellowstone. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 77:131-151.
15. Guindon B. Assessing the radiometric delity of high resolution image mosaics. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 1997, 52:229-243.
16. Hansen A.J., Knight R.L., Marzluff J.M., Powell S., Brown K., Gude P.H., et al. Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecological Applications 2005, 15:1893-1905.
17. Huang C., Yang L., Homer C., Wylie B., Vogelman J., DeFelice T. At-satellite reflectance: A first order normalization of landsat 7 ETM+ images 2000, United States Geological Survey, Sioux falls, SD. http://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/huang2.pdf.
18. Huston M.A. The three phases of land-use change: implications for biodiversity. Ecological Applications 2005, 15:1864-1878.
19. Imhoff M.L., Lawrence W.T., Elvidge C.D., Paul T., Levine E., Privalsky M.V. Using nighttime Dmsp/Ols images of city lights to estimate the impact of urban land use on soil resources in the United States. Remote Sensing of Environment 1997, 59:105-117.
20. Jensen J.R. Remote sensing of the Environment 2007, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
21. Jensen J.R., Cowen D.C. Remote sensing of urban suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1999, 65:611-622.
22. Karathanassi V., Iossifidis C., Rokos D. A texture-based classification method for classifying built areas according to their density. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2000, 21:1807-1823.
23. Lackner M., Conway T.M. Determining land-use information from land cover through an object-oriented classification of Ikonos imagery. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 2008, 34:77-92.
24. Langford M. Refining methods for dasymmetric mapping. Remotely sensed cities 2003, 137-156. Taylor & Francis, New York. V. Mesev (Ed.).
25. Lee S., Lathrop R.G. Subpixel analysis of landsat ETM+ using self-organizing map (SOM) neural networks for urban land cover characterization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2006, 44:1642-1654.
26. Lu D., Weng Q. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2007, 28:823-870.
27. MacIlwraith T.F. Looking for old Ontario: Two centuries of landscape change 1997, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
28. Marshall I.B., Schut P.H. A national ecological framework for Canada - Overview 1999, Environment Canada and Agriculture and Agri-FoodCanada. http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/nsdb/ecostrat/intro.html.
29. Masek J.G., Lindsay F.E., Goward S.N. Dynamics of urban growth in the Washington DC metropolitan area, 1973-1996, from landsat observations. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2000, 21:3473-3486.
30. McCauley S., Goetz S.J. Mapping residential density patterns using multi-temporal landsat data and a decision-tree classifier. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2004, 25:1077-1094.
31. Mesev V. Remotely sensed cities 2003, Taylor & Francis, New York.
32. Nelson A.C. Characterizing exurbia. Journal of Planning Literature 1992, 6:350-368.
33. Olthof I., Pouliot D., Fernandes R., Latifovic R. Landsat-7 ETM+ radiometric normalization comparison for northern mapping applications. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 95:388-398.
34. Paola J.D., Schowengerdt R.A. A detailed comparison of backpropagation neural-network and maximum-likelihood classifiers for urban land-use classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1995, 33:981-996.
35. Phinn S.R. A framework for selecting appropriate remotely sensed data dimensions for environmental monitoring and management. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1998, 19:3457-3463.
36. Rogerson P.A. Statistical methods for geography 2001, Sage Publications Ltd, California.
37. Sim S.H., Clarke K. Dasymetric mapping with object-oriented classification and GIS. IGARSS 2005: IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium 2005, 4991-4992. 1-8, Proceedings.
38. Small C. Estimation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2001, 22:1305-1334.
39. Small C. Multitemporal analysis of urban reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment 2002, 81:427-442.
40. Small C. High spatial resolution spectral mixture analysis of urban reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment 2003, 88:170-186.
41. Spectorsky A.C. The exurbanites 1955, Lippincott, Philadelphia.
42. Statistics Canada Canadian census Last Accessed 05.03.2009. http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/prof/92-591/index.cfm%3FLang%3DE.
43. Stuckens J., Coppin P.R., Bauer M.E. Integrating contextual information with per-pixel classification for improved land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 2000, 71:282-296.
44. Thapa R.B., Murayama Y. Urban mapping, accuracy, & image classification: a comparison of multiple approaches in Tsukuba city, Japan. Applied Geography 2009, 29:135-144.
45. Theobald D.M. Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecology and Society 2005, 10.
46. Treitz P.M., Howarth P.J., Gong P. Application of satellite and GIS technologies for land-cover and land-use mapping at the rural-urban fringe: a case-study. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1992, 58:439-448.
47. Wiens J.A., Crawford C.S., Gosz J.R. Boundary dynamics - a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos 1985, 45:421-427.
48. Wiken E.B. Terrestrial ecozones of Canada. Ecological land classification Series 1986, Vol. 19. Lands Directorate, Environment Canada, Ottawa.
49. Zha Y., Gao J., Ni S. Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2003, 24:583-594.
50. Zhang Y. Optimisation of building detection in satellite images by combining multispectral classification and texture filtering. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 1999, 54:50-60.
51. Zhang J., Foody G.M. A fuzzy classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1998, 19:2721-2738.
52. Zhang Q., Wang J., Gong P., Shi P. Study of urban spatial patterns from SPOT panchromatic imagery using textural analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2003, 24:4137-4160.
53. Zhang Q., Wang J., Peng X., Gong P., Shi P. Urban built-up land change detection with road density and spectral information from multi-temporal Landsat TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2002, 23:3057-3078.