A methodological investigation of hominoid craniodental morphology and phylogenetics

Journal of Human Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 47-57

  Bjarnason, Alexander ^a   Chamberlain, Andrew ^b   Lockwood, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cladistics; Distance based; Hominoid; Morphometrics; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ANALYSIS; HOMINID; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

HAPLORHINI; HOMINIDAE; HOMINOIDEA; HYLOBATES; PONGO; PONGO PYGMAEUS;

EID: 78649445247     PISSN: 00472484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Andrews P. Cladistic relationships of extant and fossil hominoids. J. Hum. Evol. 1987, 16:101-118.
2. Archie J.W. Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis. Syst. Zool. 1985, 34:326-345.
3. Avise J.C. Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution 2004, Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts. second ed.
4. Begun D.R. Miocene fossil hominoids and the chimp-human clade. Science 1992, 247:1929-1933.
5. Begun D.R. Relationships among the great apes and humans: new interpretations based on the fossil great ape Dryopithecus. Yearbk. Phys. Anthropol. 1994, 37:11-63.
6. Cameron D.W., Groves C.P. Bones, Stones and Molecules: "Out of Africa" and Human Origins 2004, Elsevier Academic Press, London.
7. Cavalli-Sforza L.L., Edwards A.W.F. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1967, 19:233-257.
8. Chamberlain, A.T., 1987. A taxonomic review and phylogenetic analysis of Homo habilis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Liverpool.
9. Chamberlain A.T., Wood B. Early hominid phylogeny. J. Hum. Evol. 1987, 16:119-133.
10. Collard M., Wood B. How reliable are human phylogenetic hypotheses?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2000, 97:5003-5006.
11. Collard M., Wood B. Homoplasy and the early hominid masticatory system: inferences from analyses of living hominoids and papionins. J. Hum. Evol. 2001, 41:167-194.
12. Creel N. Size and phylogeny in hominoid primates. Syst. Zool. 1986, 35:81-99.
13. Darroch J.N., Mosimann J.E. Canonical and principal components of shape. Biometrika 1985, 72:241-252.
14. Efron B., Gong G. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Am. Stat. 1983, 37:36-48.
15. Farris J.S. Phenetics in camouflage. Cladistics 1990, 6:91-100.
16. Felsenstein J. Distance methods for inferring phylogenies: a justification. Evolution 1984, 38:16-24.
17. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
18. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1988, 19:445-471.
19. Felsenstein J. Quantitative characters, phylogenies, and morphometrics. Morphology, Shape and Phylogeny 2002, 27-44. Taylor & Francis, London. N. MacLeod, P.L. Forey (Eds.).
20. Felsenstein J. Inferring Phylogenies 2004, Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts.
21. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.6) 2005, University of Washington, Seattle.
22. Gilbert C.C., Rossie J.B. Congruence of molecules and morphology using a narrow allometric approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104:11910-11914.
23. Gilbert C.C., Frost S.R., Strait D.S. Allometry, sexual dimorphism, and phylogeny: a cladistic analysis of extant African papionins using craniodental data. J. Hum. Evol. 2009, 57:298-320.
24. Goodall C. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 1991, 53:285-339.
25. Goodman M. Immunochemistry of the primates and primate evolution. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1962, 102:219-234.
26. Goodman M., Bailey W.J., Hayasaka K., Stanhope M.J., Slightom J., Czelusniak J. Molecular evidence on primate phylogeny from DNA sequences. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1994, 94:3-24.
27. Gower J.C. Generalised procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 1975, 40:33-51.
28. Groves C.P. Systematics of the great apes. Systematics, Evolution and Anatomy 1986, vol. 1:187-217. Alan R. Liss, New York. D. Swindler, J. Erwin (Eds.).
29. Groves C.P. Speciation in living hominoids. Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution 1993, 109-121. Plenum Press, New York. W.H. Kimbel, L.B. Martin (Eds.).
30. Groves C.P., Patterson J.D. Testing hominoid phylogeny with the PHYLIP program. J. Hum. Evol. 1991, 20:167-183.
31. Hartwig-Scherer, S., 1993. Allometry in hominoids: a comparative study of skeletal growth trends. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Zurich.
32. Harvati K., Weaver T.D. Human cranial anatomy and the differential preservation of population history and climate signatures. Anat. Rec. A Discov. Mol. Cell. Evol. Biol. 2006, 288:1225-1233.
33. Hillis D.M., Bull J.J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 1993, 42:182-192.
34. Huelsenbeck J.P. When are fossils better than extant taxa in phylogenetic analysis?. Syst. Zool. 1991, 40:458-469.
35. Humphries C.J. Homology, characters and continuous variables. Morphology, Shape and Phylogeny 2002, 8-26. Taylor & Francis, London. N. MacLeod, P.L. Forey (Eds.).
36. Jungers W.L., Falsetti A.B., Wall C.E. Shape, relative size, and size-adjustments in morphometrics. Yearbk. Phys. Anthropol. 1995, 38:137-161.
37. Kim J., Rohlf F.J., Sokal R.R. The accuracy of phylogenetic estimation using the neighbor-joining method. Evolution 1993, 47:471-486.
38. Kluge A.G. Cladistics and the classification of the great apes. New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry 1983, 151-177. Plenum Press, New York. R. Ciochon, R. Corrucini (Eds.).
39. Kuhner M.K., Felsenstein J. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1994, 11:459-468.
40. Lockwood C.A., Kimbel W.H., Lynch J.M. Quantifying temporal bone morphology of great apes and humans: an approach using geometric morphometrics. J. Anat. 2002, 201:447-464.
41. Lockwood C.A., Kimbel W.H., Lynch J.M. Morphometrics and hominoid phylogeny: support for a chimpanzee-human clade and differentiation among great ape subspecies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004, 101:4356-4360.
42. Martin L. Relationships among extant and extinct great apes and humans. Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution 1986, 161-187. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Wood, L. Martin, P. Andrews (Eds.).
43. Martin R.D. Primate Origins and Evolution: A Phylogenetic Reconstruction 1990, Chapman and Hall, London.
44. Mickevich M.F., Johnson M.S. Congruence between morphological and allozyme data in evolutionary inference and character evolution. Syst. Zool. 1976, 25:260-270.
45. Nadal-Roberts M., Collard M. Impact of methodological choices on assessments of the reliability of fossil primate phylogenetic hypotheses. Folia Primatol. 2005, 76:207-221.
46. O'Higgins P., Jones N. Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. J. Anat. 1998, 193:251-272.
47. Patterson C. Significance of fossils in determining evolutionary relationships. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1981, 12:195-223.
48. Rae T.C. The logical basis for the use of continuous characters in phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 1998, 14:221-228.
49. Rohlf F.J., Slice D. Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 1990, 39:40-59.
50. Ruvolo M. Molecular phylogeny of the hominoids: inferences from multiple independent DNA sequence data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1997, 14:248-265.
51. Ruvolo M., Distotell T.R., Allard M.W., Brown W.M., Honeycutt R.L. Resolution of the African hominoid trichotomy by use of a mitochondrial gene sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1991, 88:1570-1574.
52. Ruvolo M., Pan D., Zehr S., Goldberg T., Distotell T.R., von Dornum M. Gene trees and hominoid phylogeny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1994, 91:8900-8904.
53. Saitou N., Imanishi T. Relative efficiencies of the Fitch-Margoliash, maximum-parsimony, maximum-likelihood, minimum-evolution, and neighbor-joining methods of phylogenetic tree construction in obtaining the correct tree. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1989, 6:514-525.
54. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4:406-425.
55. Santini F., Tyler J.C. The importance of even highly incomplete fossil taxa in reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships of the tetraodontiformes. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2004, 44:349-357.
56. Sarich V.M., Wilson A.C. Immunological time scale for hominid evolution. Science 1967, 158:1200-1203.
57. Schwartz J.H. The evolutionary relationships of man and orang-utans. Nature 1984, 308:501-505.
58. Shoshani J., Groves C.P., Simons E.L., Gunnell G.F. Primate phylogeny: morphological vs. molecular results. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1996, 5:102-154.
59. Sibley C.G., Ahlquist J.E. The phylogeny of the hominoid primates, as indicated by DNA-DNA hybridization. J. Mol. Evol. 1984, 20:2-15.
60. Sibley C.G., Ahlquist J.E. DNA hybridization evidence of hominoid phylogeny: results from an expanded data set. J. Mol. Evol. 1987, 26:99-121.
61. Smith H.F., Terhune C.E., Lockwood C.A. Genetic, geographic, and environmental correlates of human temporal bone variation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2007, 134:312-322.
62. Soltis P.S., Soltis D.E. Applying the bootstrap in phylogeny reconstruction. Stat. Sci. 2003, 18:256-267.
63. Strait D.S., Grine F.E. Inferring hominoid and early hominid phylogeny using craniodental characters: the role of fossil taxa. J. Hum. Evol. 2004, 47:399-452.
64. Swiderski D.L., Zelditch M.L., Fink W.L. Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 1998, 47:508-519.
65. Swofford D.L. PAUP Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (Version 4.0) 1998, Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts.
66. Thorpe R.S. Coding morphometric characters for constructing distance Wagner networks. Evolution 1984, 38:244-255.
67. Whittaker D.J., Morales J.C., Melnick D.J. Resolution of the Hylobates phylogeny: congruence of mitochondrial D-loop sequences with molecular, behavioral, and morphological data sets. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 45:620-628.
68. Wiens J.J. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy?. Syst. Biol. 1998, 47:625-640.
69. Wiens J.J. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52:528-538.
70. Young N.M. A reassessment of living hominoid postcranial variability: implications for ape evolution. J. Hum. Evol. 2003, 45:441-464.
71. Zuckerkandl E., Pauling L. Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. J. Theor. Biol. 1965, 8:357-366.
72. Zuckerkandl E., Jones R.T., Pauling L. A comparison of animal hemoglobins by tryptic peptide pattern analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1960, 46:1349-1360.