Integrating social and natural resource information to improve planning for motorized recreation

Applied Geography

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 85-97

  Albritton, Rachel ^a   Stein, Taylor V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict resolution; Off highway vehicle recreation; Recreation conflict; Recreation planning; Unmanaged recreation

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; DISPUTE RESOLUTION; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; PLANNING PROCESS; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORT VEHICLE;

EID: 78649443434     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Algina J., Olejnik S., Ocanto R. Type I error and power estimations for selected two-sample tests of scale. Journal of Educational Statistics 1989, 14:373-384.
2. Blahna D., Smith K., Anderson J. Backcountry llama packing: visitor perceptions of acceptability and conflict. Leisure Sciences 1995, 17:185-204.
3. Bosworth D. Four threats to the national forests and grasslands 2004, Idaho environmental forum, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Boise, ID.
4. Brown G. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management. Society Natural Resources 2005, 18:17-39.
5. Buckley R. Environmental impacts of ecotourism 2004, CABI Publishing, Oxford.
6. Carothers P., Vaske J.J., Donnelly M.P. Social values vs. interpersonal conflict among hikers and mountain bikers. Leisure Sciences 2001, 23:47-61.
7. Carr M.H., Zwick P. Using GIS suitability analysis to identify potential future land use conflicts in North Central Florida. Journal of Conservation Planning 2005, 1:89-105.
8. Carr M.H., Zwick P. Smart land-use analysis: The LUCIS model 2007, Redlands, CA.
9. Chavez D.J., Knap N.E. Manager perceptions of issues and actions for off-highway vehicle management on national forests in California 2006, Res. Paper PSW-RP-250, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, CA.
10. Clark R.N., Stankey G.H. The recreation opportunity spectrum: A framework for planning, management, and research 1979, (Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-98), U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest Research Station.
11. Cordell H., Betz K., Green G., Owens M. Off-highway vehicle recreation in the United States: Regions and states: A national report from the national survey of recreation and environment (NSRE) 2005, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, January 19, 2006.
12. Crimmins T.M., the National Off-Highway Vehicle Conservation Council Management guidelines for OHV recreation 2006, Great Falls, MT.
13. Daniels S.E., Krannich R.S. The recreational opportunity spectrum as a conflict management tool. Social science and natural resource management 1990, 165-179. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. J. Vining (Ed.).
14. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method 2000, J. Wiley, New York.
15. Dolesh R.J. Tough terrain: the conflicts associated with multiple-use trails. Parks and Recreation 2004, 39:56-63.
16. Falbo D., Queen L., Blinn C. Introduction to data analysis using a geographic information system 1991, Minnesota Extension Service Publication, NR-FO-5740-E.
17. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee Vegetation classification standard Retrieved on April 30, 2006 from. http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/vegetation/index_html.
18. Fisher A.L., Blahna D.J., Bahr R. Off highway vehicle used and owner preference in Utah 2001, Prepared for Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, Utah State University.
19. Florida Department of Forestry (FDOF) Silviculture best management practices: appendix 2 soils Retrieved on April 25, 2006 from. http://www.fl-dof.com/forest_management/bmp/page_58.html.
20. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI), Florida Department of Natural Resources (FDNR) Guide to the natural communities of Florida 1990, Tallahassee, FL.
21. Fly J.M., Stephens B., Askins L., Hodges D. Tennessee OHV user survey 2002, Human Dimensions Lab; Division of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
22. Gimblett H.R., Guisse A.W. Assessing and mapping conflicting recreation values in state park settings using neural networks. AI Applications 1997, 11:79-89.
23. Graefe A.R., Thapa B. Conflict in natural resource recreation. Society natural resources a summary of knowledge 2004, 209-224. University Park, PA. M.J. Manfredo, J.J. Vaske, B.L. Bruyere, D.R. Field, P.J. Brown (Eds.).
24. Hammitt W.E., Cole D.N. Wildland recreation: Ecology and management 1998, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
25. Hammitt W.E., Schneider I.E. Recreation conflict management. Trends in outdoor recreation, leisure, and tourism 2000, 347-356. CAB International Publishing. W.C. Gartner, D.W. Lime (Eds.).
26. Havlick D. No place distant: Roads and motorized recreation on Americas public lands 2002, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
27. Ivy M.I., Stewart W.P., Lue C. Exploring the role of tolerance in recreation conflict. Journal of Leisure Research 1992, 24:348-360.
28. Jacob G.R. Conflict in outdoor recreation - the search for understanding. Utah Tourism and Recreation Review 1977, 6:1-5.
29. Jacob G.R., Schreyer R. Conflicts in outdoor recreation: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Leisure Research 1980, 12:368-380.
30. Kawaja J. Comments of the route designation in the sand pine scrub ecosystem Retrieved on January 2, 2007 from. http://www.fl4wda.com/pdf/phase2_comments.pdf.
31. Kliskey A.D. Recreation terrain suitability mapping: a spatially explicitly methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 52:33-43.
32. Manning R.E. Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction 1999, Corvallis, OR. 2nd ed.
33. Moore R.L. Conflict on multiple-use trails: Synthesis of the literature and state of practice 1994, Report No. FHWA-PD-94-031, Federal Highway Administration.
34. Naber M.D., Leung Y. Technology lends a helping hand: recreation managers are learning the benefits of using geospatial technologies in resource management. Parks and Recreation 2006, 41:24-29.
35. Neal, D. (1999). Life on the rocks: environmental perceptions of the rock crawlers, a western American recreational community. PhD dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland.
36. Parent G.D., Alavalapati J.R.R., Stein T.V., Hodges A.W. CMA economic impact and visitor assessment survey final report 2007, Submitted to the Florida Division of Forestry, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Gainesville, FL.
37. Ramthun R. Factors in user group conflict between hikers and mountain bikers. Leisure Sciences 1995, 17:159-169.
38. Reed P., Brown G. Values suitability analysis: a methodology for identifying and integrating public perceptions of ecosystem values in forest planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2003, 46:643-658.
39. Sanyal N. Using segmentation to develop an off-highway vehicle route system in the Colville national forest. Proceedings for the 13th international symposium on society and resource management: Landscape continuity and change social science perspectives and interdisciplinary contributions 2007, Abstract, Park City, UT.
40. Snyder S.A., Whitmore J.H., Schneider I.E., Becker D.R. Ecological criteria, participant preferences and location models: a GIS approach toward ATV trail planning. Applied Geography 2008, 28(4):248-258.
41. Thapa B., Graefe A.R. Gender and age group differences in recreation conflict and tolerance among adult skiers and snowboarders. Proceedings of the 1998 northeastern recreation research symposium 1998 1999, (Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-255, 219-226), U.S.D.A., Forest Service, Radnor, PA.
42. Thapa B., Graefe A.R. Level of skill and its relationship to recreation conflict and tolerance among adult skiers and snowboarders. World Leisure 2003, 1:13-25.
43. Thapa B., Graefe A.R. Recreation conflict and tolerance among skiers and snowboarders. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 2004, 22:37-52.
44. The Nature Conservancy Standardized national vegetation classification system Retrieved online on April 16 from. http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/classification/index.html.
45. Todd S.L., Graefe A.R. Level of experience and perception of conflict among canoeists on the Delaware River. Northeast proceedings of the 1989 northeastern recreation research symposium 1989, 147-156. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Burlington, VT, (Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-132.
46. Turner J.Rick, Thayer J. Introduction to analysis of variance 2001, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, Focus on explaining different types of designs.
47. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Revised land and resource management plan for national forests in Florida 1999, U.S.D.A., Tallahassee, FL.
48. U.S.D.A. Forest Service FEIS and appendices. Final environmental impact statement for the access designation on the Ocala national forest 2005, Vol. 1. U.S.D.A., Tallahassee, FL.
49. Vaske J.J., Carothers P., Donnelly M.P., Baird B. Recreation conflict among skiers and snowboarders. Leisure Sciences 2000, 22:297-313.
50. Watson A., Niccolucci M., Williams D. The nature of conflict between hikers and recreational stock users in the John Muir Wilderness. Journal of Leisure Research 1994, 26:372-385.
51. Watson A., Williams D., Daigle J. Sources of conflict between hikers and mountain bikers in Rattlesnake NRA. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 1991, 9:59-71.
52. Wernex J. Off-highway motorcycle and ATV trails guidelines for design, construction, maintenance and user satisfaction 1994, American Motorcycle Association, Pickerington, OH. 2nd ed.
53. Whiting D., Card A., Wilson C. Soil drainage Document 217. Colorado State University Extension. Retrieved online on April 15. 2007 from. http://cmg.colostate.edu/gardennotes/217.pdf.
54. Wildlaw Undesignated OHV routes in the Apalachicola and Ocala national forests: Inventory, maps, and recommendations 2006, Tallahassee, FL.
55. Wing M., Shelby B. Using GIS to integrate information on forest recreation. Journal of Forestry 1999, 97(1):12-16.