A geomorphological approach to carbonate sand searches

Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on Carbonate Sand Beaches - Carbonate Beaches 2000

Volumn 305, Issue , 2000, Pages 53-66

  Finkl, Charles W ^a   Khalil, Syed M ^b   Spadoni, Richard H ^c  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA   (India)

^c Coastal Planning and Engineering ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Geomorphology; Sand

Indexed keywords

CALCAREOUS SAND; CARBONATE SAND; CARBONATE SEDIMENTS; CLASTIC SEDIMENTS; COASTAL PROCESS; DEPOCENTERS; FLORIDA; GEOPHYSICAL DATA; GEOTECHNICAL; NEW MODEL; OFFSHORE SANDS; PROCESS ZONE; SAND BODY; SEABED SAND; SEARCH MODELS; SEDIMENT DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS; UPPER SHOREFACE;

BEACHES; CARBONATION; COASTAL ZONES; GEOMORPHOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; REEFS; SEDIMENTATION; SEDIMENTOLOGY;

SAND;

EID: 78649430744     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/40640(305)5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Andrews, J., 2001. Results of the Miami-Dade County Deepwater Sand Search Investigation. This volume.
2. ASTM, 1987. Standard method for particle-size analysis of soils, designation D422-63. 1987 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 04. 08 Soil and Rock; Building Stones; Geotextiles. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing Materials.
3. Beaujean, P.-P., 1995. Sediment Classification of the Sea Floor Using the Chirp Sonar and Blot Model. M.S. thesis, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida.
4. Berger, A.R. and Iams, W.J., (eds.), 1996. Geoindicators. Rotterdam: Balkema, 466p.
5. Bruun, P., 1995. The development of downdrift erosion. Journal of Coastal Research, 11(4), 1242-1257.
6. Cooke, C.W., 1945. Geology of Florida. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin No. 29.
7. DaPrato, G.W. and Finkl, C.W., 1994. Applications of a layered classification approach, based on spatial primitives obtained from TM data from southern Florida, for the analysis of turbid marine waters using fuzzy sets. Proceedings Mapping and Geographic Information Systems Symposium (Athens, Georgia), pp. 69-76.
8. Davies, J.L, 1980. Geographical Variation in Coastal Development. London: Longman, 212p.
9. Demek, J., 1972. Manual of Detailed Geomorphological Mapping. Prague: Academia.
10. Duane, D.B. and Meisburger, E.P., 1969. Geomorphology and sediments of the nearshore continental shelf: Miami to Palm Beach, Florida. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Technical Memorandum No. 29, v.p.
11. Finkl, C.W. and DaPrato, G.W., 1993. Delineation and distribution of nearshore reefs in subtropical southeast Florida coastal environments using Thematic Mapper imagery. Marine Technology Society (MTS 93) Conference Proceedings (Long Beach, California), pp. 90-96.
12. th Annual National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology (St. Petersburg, Florida), pp. 304-319.
13. Finkl, C.W., Khalil, S.M., and Andrews, J.L., 1997. Offshore sand sources for beach replenishment: Potential borrows on the continental shelf of the eastern Gulf of mexico. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 15, 155-173. (Pubitemid 27481951)
14. Finkl, C.W. and Bruun, P., 1998. Potentials for manipulating wave action via port and coastal engineering. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 26, pp. 1-10.
15. th Conference on Coastal Engineering (ASCE), pp. 1326-1341.
16. Huntley, D.A. and Short, A.D., 1992. On the spacing between observed rip currents. Coastal Engineering, 17, 211-225.
17. th Conference on Coastal Engineering (ASCE), pp. 614-625.
18. Pilkey, O.H.; Young, R.S.; Riggs, S.R.; Smith, A.W.S.; Wu, H., and Pilkey, W.D., 1993. The concept of the shoreface profile of equilibrium: a critical review. Journal of Coastal Research, 9, 255-278. (Pubitemid 267097)
19. Schock, S.G. and LeBlanc, L.R., 1990. Chirp sonar: new technology for subbottom profiling. Sea Technology, 31, 35-43.
20. Short, A.D., (ed.), 2000. Handbook of Beach and Shoreface Morphodynamics. New York: Wiley, 379p.
21. Silvester, R. and Hsu, J.R.C., 1993. Coastal Stabilization: Innovative Concepts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 578p.
22. Thieler, E.R.; Pilkey, O.H.; Young, R.S.; Bush, D.M., and Chai, F., 2000. The use of mathematical models to predict beach behavior for U.S. coastal engineering: a critical review. Journal of Coastal Research, 16, 48-70.
23. Wright, L.D. and Short, A.D., 1984. Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: A synthesis. Marine Geology, 56, 93-118.