Comparison of mating disruption and mass trapping with Pyralidae and Sesiidae moths

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Volumn 137, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 176-183

  Teixeira, Luís A F ^a   Miller, James R ^a   Epstein, David L ^a   Gut, Larry J ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

American plum borer; Competitive attraction; Euzophera semifuneralis; IPM; Lepidoptera; Lesser peachtree borer; Peachtree borer; Relative dispenser activity; Synanthedon exitiosa; Synanthedon pictipes; Tree fruit

Indexed keywords

BAIT; FRUIT; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; MATING DISRUPTION; MOTH; PEST SPECIES; PHEROMONE TRAP; SEX PHEROMONE; TRAPPING;

EUZOPHERA SEMIFUNERALIS; LEPIDOPTERA; PRUNUS AMERICANA; PRUNUS DOMESTICA; PRUNUS PERSICA; PYRALIDAE; SESIIDAE; SYNANTHEDON; SYNANTHEDON EXITIOSA; SYNANTHEDON PICTIPES;

EID: 78649422584     PISSN: 00138703     EISSN: 15707458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.01047.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bartell RJ (1982) Mechanisms of communication disruption by pheromone in control of Lepidoptera: a review. Physiological Entomology 7: 353-364.
2. Biddinger DJ (1989) The Biology and Control of the American Plum Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on Tart Cherries in Michigan. MSc Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
3. Biddinger DJ, Roelofs W & Howitt AJ (1994) The development of a sex pheromone lure of the American plum borer, Euzophera semifuneralis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), a major pest of cherries in Michigan. Great Lakes Entomologist 26: 311-317.
4. Byers JA (2007) Simulation of mating disruption and mass trapping with competitive attraction and camouflage. Environmental Entomology 36: 1328-1338.
5. Cardé RT & Minks AK (1995) Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 559-585.
6. El-Sayed AM, Suckling DM, Wearing CH & Byers JA (2006) Potential of mass trapping for long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species. Journal of Economic Entomology 99: 1550-1564.
7. Gentry CR, Bierl-Leonhardt BA, Mclaughlin JR & Plimmer JR (1980) Air permeation tests with (Z, Z)-3, 13-octadecadien-1-ol acetate for reduction in trap catch of peachtree and lesser peachtree borer moths. Journal of Chemical Ecology 7: 575-582.
8. Gut LJ, Stelinski LL, Thomson DR & Miller JR (2004) Behavior-modifying chemicals: prospects and constraints in IPM. Integrated Pest Management-Potential, Constraints, and Challenges (ed. by O Koul, GS Dhaliwal & G Cuperus), pp. 73-121. CABI, New York, NY, USA.
9. Howitt A (1993) Common Tree Fruit Pests. North Central Region Extension Publication #63. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
10. Leskey TC, Bergh JC, Walgenbach JF & Zhang A (2009) Evaluation of pheromone-based management strategies for dogwood borer (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) in commercial apple orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology 102: 1085-1093.
11. Mclaughlin J, Doolittle R, Gentry C, Mitchell E & Tumlinson J (1976) Response to pheromone traps and disruption of pheromone communication in the lesser peachtree borer and the peachtree borer. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2: 73-81.
12. Miller JR, Gut LJ, De Lame FM & Stelinski LL (2006a) Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (part 1): theory. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32: 2089-2114.
13. Miller JR, Gut LJ, De Lame FM & Stelinski LL (2006b) Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (part 2): case studies. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32: 2115-2143.
14. Miller JR, Mcghee PS, Siegert PY, Adams CG, Huang J et al. (2010) General principles of attraction and competitive attraction as revealed by large-cage studies of moths responding to sex pheromone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 22-27.
15. Pfeiffer DG, Killian JC, Rajotte EG, Hull LA & Snow JW (1991) Mating disruption for reduction of damage by lesser peachtree borer (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) in Virginia and Pennsylvania peach orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology 84: 218-223.
16. Sanders CJ (1997) Mechanisms of mating disruption in moths. Insect Pheromone Research: New Directions (ed. by RT Cardé & AK Minks), pp. 333-346. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA.
17. Snow JW (1990) Peachtree borer and lesser peachtree borer control in the United States. Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management (ed. by RL Ridgway, RM Silverstein & MN Inscoe), pp. 241-253. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.
18. Snow JW, Gentry CR & Novak M (1985) Behavior and control of the peachtree borer and lesser pechtree borer (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) in peach orchards permeated with (Z, Z)-3, 13- octadecadien-1-ol acetate. Journal of Economic Entomology 78: 190-196.
19. Tumlinson JH, Yonce CE, Doolittle RE, Heath RR, Gentry CR & Mitchell ER (1974) Sex pheromones and reproductive isolation of the lesser peachtree borer and peachtree borer. Science 185: 614-616.
20. Witzgall P, Stelinski L, Gut L & Thomson D (2008) Codling moth management and chemical ecology. Annual Review of Entomology 53: 503-522.
21. Yamanaka T (2007) Mating disruption or mass trapping? Numerical simulation analysis of a control strategy for lepidopteran pests. Population Ecology 49: 75-86.
22. Yamanaka T & Liebhold AM (2009) Spatially implicit approaches to understanding the manipulation of mating success for insect invasion management. Population Ecology 51: 427-444.