Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of synthetic musk in Suzhou Creek

Journal of Shanghai University

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 306-311

  Wang, Feng Ling ^a   Zhou, Ying ^a   Guo, Ya Wen ^a   Zou, Li Yin ^a   Zhang, Xiao Lan ^a   Zeng, Xiang Ying ^b  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GUANGZHOU INSTITUTE OF GEOCHEMISTRY   (China)

Author keywords

Musk; Sediments; Surface waters; Suzhou creek

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649414713     PISSN: 10076417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11741-010-0649-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kannan K, Reiner J L, Yun S H, Perrotta E E, Tao L, Johnson R B, Rodan B D. Polycyclic musk compounds in higher tropic level aquatic organisms and humans from the United States [J]. Chemosphere, 2005, 61(5): 693-700.
2. Artola G E, Borkent I, Hermens J L, Vaes W H. Removal of two polycyclic musks in sewage treatment plants: Freely dissolved and total concentrations [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2003, 37(14): 3111-3116.
3. Nakata H, Sasaki H, Takemura A, Yoshioka M, Tanabe S, Kannan K. Bioaccumulation, temporal trend, and geographical distribution of synthetic musks in the marine environment [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2007, 41(7): 2216-2222.
4. Bitsch N, Dudas C, Korner W, Failing K, Biselli S, Rimkus G G, Brunn H. Estrogenic activity of musk fragrances detected by the E-screen assay using human MCF-7 cells [J]. Archives of Environment Contamination Toxicology, 2002, 43(3): 257-264.
5. Horii Y, Reiner J L, Loganathan B G, Kumar K S, Sajwan K, Kannan K. Occurrence and fate of polycyclic musks in wastewater treatment plants in Kentucky and Georgia, USA [J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 68(11): 2011-2020.
6. Yang J J, Metcalfe C D. Fate of synthetic musks in a domestic wastewater treatment plant and in an agricultural field amended with biosolids [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 363(1-3): 149-165.
7. Peck A M, Hornbuckle K C. Synthetic musk fragrances in Lake Michigan [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2004, 38(2): 367-372.
8. Moldovan Z. Occurrences of pharmaceutical and personal care products as micropollutants in rivers from Romania [J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 64(11): 1808-1817.
9. Buerge I J, Buser H R, Muller M D, Poiger T. Behavior of the polycyclic musks HHCB and ANTH in lakes, two potential anthropogenic markers for domestic wastewater in surface water [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2003, 37(24): 5636-5644.
10. Zhang X L, Yao Y, Zeng X Y, Qian G R, Guo Y W, Wu M H, Sheng G Y, Fu J M. Syntheticmusks in the aquatic environment and personal care products in Shanghai, China [J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 72(10): 1553-1558.
11. Zeng X Y, Mai B X, Sheng G Y, Luo X J, Shao W L, An T C, Fu J M. Distribution of polycyclic musks in surface sediments from the Pearl River Delta and Macao coastal region, South China [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2008, 27(1): 18-23.
12. Carballa M, Fink G, Omil F, Lerma J M, Ternes T. Determination of the solid-water distribution coefficient (Kd) for pharmaceuticals, estrogens and musk fragrances in digested sludge [J]. Water Research, 2008, 42(1-2): 287-295.
13. Back F, Blok H, Salvito D. Environmental risks of musk fragrance ingredients [M]//Daughton C G, Jones L T. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: Scientific and regulatory issues. Washington DC: Society, 2001: 168-190.
14. Reiner J L, Kannan K. A survey of polycyclic musks in selected household commodities from the United States [J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 62(6): 867-873.
15. Dsikowitzky L, Schwarzbauer J, Littke R. Distribution of polycyclic musks in water and particulate matter of the Lippe River (Germany) [J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2002, 33(12): 1747-1758.
16. Guo Ya-wen , Zhang Xiao-lan, Qian Guang-ren, Wang Jun, Liu Zhong-zhe, Liang Gao-feng, Sheng Guo-ying, Fu Jia-mo. Distribution character of synthetic musks in Urban Sewage Sludges [J]. Environmental Science, 2009, 30(5): 1493-1498 (in Chinese).
17. Fromme H, Otto T, Pilz K. Polycyclic musk fragrances in different environmental compartments in Berlin (Germany) [J]. Water Research, 2001, 35(1): 121-128.
18. Bester K. Polycyclic musks in the Ruhr catchment area-transport, discharges of waste water, and transformations of HHCB, AHTN and HHCB-lactone [J]. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 2005, 7(1): 43-51.
19. Quednow K, Puttmann W. Organophosphates and synthetic musk fragrances in freshwater streams in Hessen/ Germany [J]. Clean Soil Air Water, 2008, 36(1): 70-77.
20. Heim S, Schwarzbauer J, Kronimus A, Littke R, Woda C, Mangini A. Geochronology of anthropogenic pollutants in riparian wetland sediments of the Lippe river (Germany) [J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2004, 35(11-12): 1409-1425.
21. Peck A M, Linebaugh E K, Hornbuckle K C. Synthetic musk fragrances in Lake Erie and Lake Ontario sediment cores [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2006, 40(18): 5629-5635.
22. Winkler M, Kopf G, Hauptvogel C, Neu T. Fate of artificial musk fragrance associated with suspended particulate matter (SPM) from the River Elbe (Germany) in comparison to other organic contaminants [J]. Chemosphere, 1998, 37(6): 1139-1156.
23. Carballa M, Omil F, Lema J M. Removal of cosmetic ingredients and pharmaceuticals in sewage primary treatment [J]. Water Research, 2005, 39(19): 4790-4796.
24. Shek W M, Murphy M B, Lam J C W, Lam P K S. Synthetic polycyclic musks in Hong Kong sewage sludge [J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 71(7): 1241-1250.