Genetic polyethism in leaf-cutting ants

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1165-1169

  Waddington, Sarah J ^a   Santorelli, Lorenzo A ^a,b   Ryan, Fiona R ^a   Hughes, William O H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

division of labor; genetic diversity; polyandry; response threshold; social insect

Indexed keywords

ANT; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; COLONY STRUCTURE; DISEASE RESISTANCE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENOTYPE; MATING BEHAVIOR; POLYANDRY; POLYETHISM; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SOCIAL INSECT; TAXONOMY; THRESHOLD;

ACROMYRMEX ECHINATIOR; ANIMALIA; APIS MELLIFERA; ATTA; FORMICIDAE; HEXAPODA;

EID: 78649383811     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq128     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Armitage SAO, Boomsma JJ. 2010. The effects of age and social interactions on innate immunity in a leaf-cutting ant. J Insect Physiol. 56:780-787.
2. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav. 60:145-164.
3. Baer B, Armitage SAO, Boomsma JJ. 2006. Sperm storage induces an immunity cost in ants. Nature. 441:872-875.
4. Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P. 1999. Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature. 397: 151-154.
5. Breed MD, Williams DB, Queral A. 2002. Demand for task performance and workforce replacement: undertakers in honeybee, Apis mellifera, colonies. J Insect Behav. 15:319-329.
6. Chapman NC, Oldroyd BP, Hughes WOH. 2007. Differential responses of honeybee (Apis mellifera) patrilines to changes in stimuli for the generalist tasks of nursing and foraging. Behav Ecol Socio-biol. 61:1185-1194.
7. Crozier RH, Fjerdingstad EJ. 2001. Polyandry in social Hymenoptera - disunity in diversity? Ann Zool Fenn. 38:267-285.
8. Dijkstra MB, Boomsma JJ. 2007. The economy of worker reproduction in Acromyrmex leafcutter ants. Anim Behav. 74:519-529.
9. Fewell JH, Bertram SM. 1999. Division of labor in a dynamic environment: response by honeybees (Apis mellifera) to graded changes in colony pollen stores. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 46:171-179.
10. Grissom RJ, Kim JJ. 2005. Effect sizes for research: a broad practical approach. Hove (UK): Psychology Press.
11. Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW. 2002. Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. Behav Ecol. 13:224-231.
12. Helmkampf M, Gadau J, Feldhaar H. 2008. Population- and socioge-netic structure of the leaf-cutter ant Atta colombica (Formicidae, Myrmicinae). Insectes Soc. 55:434-442.
13. Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ. 2004. Genetic diversity and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ant societies. Evolution. 58:1251-1260.
14. Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ. 2006. Does genetic diversity hinder parasite evolution in social insect colonies? J Evol Biol. 19:132-143.
15. Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ. 2007. Genetic polymorphism in leaf-cutting ants is phenotypically plastic. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 274:1625-1630.
16. Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ. 2008. Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:5150-5153.
17. Hughes WOH, Bot ANM, Boomsma JJ. 2010. Caste-specific expression of genetic variation in the size of antibiotic-producing glands of leaf-cutting ants. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 277:609-615.
18. Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW. 2008. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of euso-ciality. Science. 320:1213-1216.
19. Hughes WOH, Ratnieks FLW, Oldroyd BP. 2008. Multiple mating or multiple queens: two routes to genetic diversity in the eusocial Hymenoptera. J Evol Biol. 21:1090-1095.
20. Hughes WOH, Sumner S, Van Borm S, Boomsma JJ. 2003. Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:9394-9397.
21. Jaffé R, Kronauer DJC, Kraus FB, Boomsma JJ, Moritz RFA. 2007. Worker caste determination in the army ant Eciton burchellii. Biol Lett. 3:513-516.
22. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev. 75:21-64.
23. Jones JC, Myerscough MR, Graham S, Oldroyd BP. 2004. Honey bee nest thermoregulation: diversity promotes stability. Science. 305: 402-404.
24. Jones JC, Nanork P, Oldroyd BP. 2007. The role of genetic diversity in nest cooling in a wild honey bee, Apis florea. J Comp Physiol A. 193:159-165.
25. Julian GE, Fewell JH. 2004. Genetic variation and task specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant, Acromyrmex versicolor. Anim Behav. 68:1-8.
26. Kryger P, Kryger U, Moritz RFA. 2000. Genotypical variability for the tasks of water collecting and scenting in a honey bee colony. Ethology. 106:769-779.
27. Mattila HR, Seeley TD. 2007. Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness. Science. 317:362-364.
28. O'Donnell S. 1996. RAPD markers suggest genotypic effects on forager specialization in a eusocial wasp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 38:83-88.
29. O'Donnell S. 1998. Genetic effects on task performance, but not on age polyethism, in a swarm-founding eusocial wasp. Anim Behav. 55:417-426.
30. Oldroyd BP, Fewell JH. 2007. Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies. Trends Ecol Evol. 22:408-413.
31. Oldroyd BP, Sylvester HA, Wongsiri S, Rinderer TE. 1994. Task specialization in a wild bee, Apis florea (Hymenoptera, Apidae), revealed by RFLP banding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 34:25-30.
32. Oldroyd BP, Thompson GJ. 2007. Behavioural genetics of the honey bee Apis mellifera. Adv In Insect Phys. 33:1-49.
33. Ortius-Lechner D, Gertsch PJ, Boomsma JJ. 2000. Variable microsatel-lite loci for the leaf cutter ant Acromyrmex echinatior and their applicability to related species. Mol Ecol. 9:114-116.
34. Page RE. 1980. The evolution of multiple mating behavior by honey bee queens Apis mellifera L. Genetics. 96:263-273.
35. Page RE, Robinson GE, Fondrk MK. 1989. Genetic specialists, kin recognition and nepotism in honeybee colonies. Nature. 338: 576-579.
36. Reber A, Castella G, Christe P, Chapuisat M. 2008. Experimentally increased group diversity improves disease resistance in an ant species. Ecol Lett. 11:682-689.
37. Rheindt FE, Strehl CP, Gadau J. 2005. A genetic component in the determination of worker polymorphism in the Florida harvester ant Pogonomyrmex badius. Insectes Soc. 52:163-168.
38. Robinson GE, Page RE. 1988. Genetic determination of guarding and undertaking in honeybee colonies. Nature. 333:356-358.
39. Seeley T, Tarpy D. 2007. Queen promiscuity lowers disease within honeybee colonies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 274:67-72.
40. Snyder LE. 1992. The genetics of social-behavior in a polygynous ant. Naturwissenschaften. 79:525-527.
41. Stuart RJ, Page RE. 1991. Genetic component to division of labor among workers of a leptothoracine ant. Naturwissenschaften. 78: 375-377.
42. Tarpy DR. 2003. Genetic diversity within honeybee colonies prevents severe infections and promotes colony growth. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 270:99-103.
43. Tarpy DR, Page RE. 2002. Sex determination and the evolution of polyandry in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 52: 143-150.
44. Waddington SJ, Hughes WOH. 2010. Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior: the role of worker size, age and plasticity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 64:1219-1228.
45. Watson PJ. 1991. Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigosa (Linyphiidae). Anim Behav. 41:343-360.
46. Yasui Y. 1998. The 'genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends Ecol Evol. 13:246-250.