Scanning electron microscopy analysis of RinsEndo system and conventional irrigation for debris removal

Brazilian Dental Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 305-309

  Vivan, Rodrigo Ricci ^a   Bortolo, Melina Vieira ^b   Duarte, Marco Antonio Hungaro ^b   de Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes ^b   Tanomaru Filho, Mario ^a   Bramante, Clovis Monteiro ^b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Endodontics; Irrigation; RinsEndo system

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649368338     PISSN: 01036440     EISSN: 18064760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000400003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gutmann JL. Clinical, radiographic, and histologic perspectives on success and failure in endodontics. Dent Clin north Am 1992;36:379-392.
2. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin north Am 1974;18:269-296.
3. Davis SR, Brayton SM, Goldman M. The morphology of the prepared root canal: a study utilizing injectable silicone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34:642-648.
4. Mizrahi SJ, Tucker JW, Seltzer S. A scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various endodontic instruments. J Endod 1975;1:324-333.
5. Stewart GG. Importance of chemomechanical preparation of the root canal. Oral Surg oral Med oral Pathol 1955;8:993-999.
6. Gutierrez JH, Garcia J. Microscopic and macroscopic investigation on results of mechanical preparation of root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1968;25:108-116.
7. Chow TW. Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. J Endod 1983;9:475-479.
8. Estrela C, Estrela CR, Barbin EL, Spanó JC, Marchesan MA, Pécora JD. Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Braz Dent J 2002;13:113-117.
9. Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Comparative study of the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine gel, chlorhexidine solution and sodium hypochlorite as endodontic irrigants. Braz Dent J 2007;18:294-298.
10. Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Assed S, Tanomaru Filho M. Histological study of the effect of some irrigating solutions on bacterial endotoxin in dogs. Braz Dent J 2004;15:109-114.
11. Setlock J, Fayad MI, BEGole E, Bruzick M. Evaluation of canal cleanliness and smear layer removal after the use of the Quantec-e irrigation system and syringe: a comparative scanning electron microscope study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:614-617.
12. Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Turaiki SA, Al-Sulami U, Saad AY. Efficacy of a new brush-covered irrigation needle in removing root canal debris: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2006;32:1181-1184.
13. Nielsen BA, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of the endoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod 2007;33:611-615.
14. Hauser V, Braun A, Frentzen M. Penetration depth of a dye marker into dentine using a novel hydrodynamic system (Rinsendo). Int Endod J 2007;40:644-652.
15. McGill S, Gulabivala K, Mordan N, Ng YL. The efficacy of dynamic irrigation using a commercially available system (Rinsendo) determined by removal of a collagen "bio-molecular film" from an ex vivo model. Int Endod J 2008;41:602-608.
16. Kennedy WA, Walker WA 3rd, Gough RW. Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage. J Endod 1986;12:21-27
17. McComb D, Smith DC. A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod 1975;1:238-242.
18. Baker NA, Eleazer PD, Averbach RE, Seltzer S. Scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various irrigating solutions. J Endod 1975;1:127-135.
19. Bolanos OR, Jensen JR. Scanning electron microscope comparisons of the efficacy of various methods of root canal preparation. J Endod 1980;6:815-822.
20. Marques AA, Marchesan MA, Sousa-Filho CB, Silva-Sousa YT, Sousa-Neto MD, Cruz-Filho AM. Smear layer removal and chelated calcium ion quantification of three irrigating solutions. Braz Dent J 2006;17:306-309.