Vernodalidimers A and B, novel orthoester elemanolide dimers from seeds of Vernonia anthelmintica

Tetrahedron Letters

Volumn 51, Issue 50, 2010, Pages 6584-6587

  Liu, Yongqiang ^a,b   Nugroho, Alfarius E ^a   Hirasawa, Yusuke ^a   Nakata, Asami ^a   Kaneda, Toshio ^a   Uchiyama, Nahoko ^c   Goda, Yukihiro ^c   Shirota, Osamu ^d   Morita, Hiroshi ^a   Aisa, Haji Akber ^b  

^a HOSHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b XINJIANG TECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY   (China)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Japan)

^d TOKUSHIMA BUNRI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTER DERIVATIVE; HERBACEOUS AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VERNODALIDIMER A; VERNODALIDIMER B; VERNODALIN; VERNODALOL;

ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; IC 50; PLANT SEED; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; VERNONIA; VERNONIA ANTHELMINTICA;

VERNONIA ANTHELMINTICA;

EID: 78649353976     PISSN: 00404039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.10.031     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Williams, R. B.; Norris, A.; Slebodnick, C.; Merola, J.; Miller, J. S.; Andriantsiferana, R.; Rasamison, V. E.; Kingston, D. G. I. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68, 1371-1374.
2. Jakupovic, J.; Zdero, C.; Boeker, R.; Warning, U.; Bohlmann, F.; Jones, S. B. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1987, 111-123.
3. Ganjian, I.; Kubo, I.; Fludzinski, P. Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 2525-2526.
4. Bardón, A.; Catalan, C. A. N.; Gutiérrez, A. B.; Herz, W. Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 2691-2694.
5. Su, B. N.; Takaishi, Y.; Tori, M.; Takaoka, S.; Honda, C.; Itoh, M.; Takeda, Y.; Kodzhimatov, O. K.; Ashurmetov, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1475-1479.
6. Fu, B.; Su, B. N.; Takaishi, Y.; Honda, G.; Ito, M.; Takeda, Y.; Kodzhimatov, O. K.; Ashurmetov, O. Phytochemistry 2001, 58, 1121-1128.
7. 14, 721.2491.
8. Abegaz, B. M.; Keige, A. W.; Diaz, J. D.; Herz, W. Phytochemistry 1994, 37, 191196.
9. Rank, C; Phipps, R. K.; Harris, P.; Fristrup, P.; Ursen, T. O.; Gotfredsen, C. H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 401-404.
10. 15, 753.2753.
11. Kupchan, S. M.; Hemingway, R. J.; Werner, D.; Karim, A.; McPhall, A. T.; Sim, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 3596-3597.
12. 3) δ 5.68 (dd, 17.6,10.8, H-1), 5.22 (d, 17.6, H-2α), 5.20 (d, 10.8, H2β), 2.44 (d, 10.5, H-5), 3.99 (dd, 10.4,10.3, H-6), 2.43 (t, 10.5, H-7), 4.07 (ddd, 11.0,10.8, 4.8, H-8), 1.94 (dd, 14.0,4.8, H-9α), 1.52 (dd, 13.8,11.6, H-9β), 6.42 (s, H-13α), 5.81 (s, H-13β), 4.56 (d, 11.9, H-14α), 4.28 (dd, 11.8, 1.6, H-14β), 6.58 (s, H-15α), 5.73 (s, H-15β), 3.76 (s, OMe).
13. 3) δ5 5.61 (dd, 17.3,11.0, H-1), 5.25 (d, 17.7, H-2α), 5.24 (d, 12.2, H-2β), 2.75 (m, H-5), 5.76 (m, H-6), 2.67 (d, 10.7, H-7), 5.77 (m, H-8), 2.13 (dd, 13.5, 4.8, H-9α), 1.55 (t, 13.0, H-9β), 6.21 (s, H-13alpha;), 5.18 (s, H-13β), 4.82 (d, 12.2, H-14α), 4.43 (d, 12.1, H-14β), 6.27 (s, H-15alpha;), 5.60 (S, H15β), 3.79 (s, OMe).
14. The limited amount of 1 and 2 didn't allow us to determine the absolute conformation by Mosher's method.
15. TURBOMOLE V6.1 2009, a development of University of Karlsruhe and Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, 1989-2007, TURBOMOLE GmbH, since 2007; available from http://www.turbomole.com.
16. Eickorn, K.; Treutler, O.; Ohm, H.; Haser, M.; Ahlrlchs, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 240, 283-289.
17. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098-3100.
18. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822-8824.
19. Weigend, F.; Kohn, A.; Hattig, C J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 31753183.
20. Schafer, A.; Horn, H.; Ahlrichs, R.J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 2571-2577.
21. (a) Halgren, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4710-4723;
22. (b) Halgren, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7827-7843;
23. (c) Halgren, T. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 490-519;
24. (d) Halgren, T. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 520-552.
25. Monte Carlo simulation and molecular mechanics calculation were conducted by Macromodel program: Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G. J.; Guida, W. C.; Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caufield, C.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.; Still, W. C J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440-467.
26. max 220 and 280 nm), while that of the 5R,6R,7R,8S,10R,17R,3'R,4'S, 5'R,6'S,7'S,8'R,10'S isomer showed two positive cotton effects with the same intensity λmax 220 and 280 nm). ECD spectrum of antipode of 1 was shown to be its mirror image.
27. Mosmann, T.J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55-63.