Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better?

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 219-243

  Dave, Chetan ^a   Eckel, Catherine C ^b   Johnson, Cathleen A ^c   Rojas, Christian ^d  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY ABU DHABI   (United Arab Emirates)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^c Environmental Research Laboratory   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Elicitation methods; Experiments; Heterogeneity; Risk aversion

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649327972     PISSN: 08955646     EISSN: 15730476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-010-9103-z     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andersen, S., Harrison, G., Lau, M., & Rutström, E. (2008). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica, 76(3), 583-618.
2. Barr, A., & Genicot, G. (2008). Risk sharing, commitment, and information: An experimental analysis. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(6), 1151-1185.
3. Becker, G., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226-232.
4. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (2005). Risk preference instability across institutions: A dilemma. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, 102, 4209-4214.
5. Binswanger, H. (1980). Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, 395-407.
6. Binswanger, H. (1981). Attitudes toward risk: Theoretical implications of an experiment in rural India. Economic Journal, 91, 867-890.
7. Bohm, P., Linden, J., & Sonnegard, J. (1997). Eliciting reservation prices: Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanisms vs. markets. Economic Journal, 107, 1079-1089.
8. Burks, S., Carpenter, J., Götte, L., & Rustichini, A. (2009). Cognitive skills explain economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(19), 7745-7750.
9. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2010). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? American Economic Review, 100(3), 1238-1260.
10. Eckel, C. (1999). Commentary on "The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor production framework." Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1-3), 47-48.
11. Eckel, C. (2007). Experiments on gender differences. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2002). Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(4), 281-295.
13. Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2008). Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(1), 1-17.
14. Eckel, C., Grossman, P., Johnson, C., Milano, A., Rojas, C., and Wilson, R. (2007). Explaining risk preferences in high school students: A preliminary look. CBEES Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas.
15. Eisenberger, R., & Weber, M. (1995). Willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept for risky and ambiguous lotteries. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 10, 223-33.
16. Engle-Warnick, J., Escobal, J., and Laszlo, S. (2005). The effect of an additional alternative on measured risk preferences in a field experiment. Unpublished manuscript. Experimental 0511003, EconWPA.
17. Harbaugh, W., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, Lise. (2002). Risk attitudes of children and adults: Choices over small and large probability gains and losses. Experimental Economics, 5(1), 53-84.
18. Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). The fourfold pattern of risk attitudes in choice and pricing tasks. The Economic Journal, 120(545), 595-611.
19. Harrison, G. (1986). An experimental test for risk aversion. Economics Letters, 21, 7-11.
20. Harrison, G. (1992). Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: Reply. American Economic Review, 82, 1426-1443.
21. Hey, J., & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected utility using experimental data. Econometrica, 62(6), 1291-1326.
22. Holt, C., & Laury, S. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644-1655.
23. Horowitz, J. (2006). The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism is not necessarily incentive compatible, even for non-random goods. Economics Letters, 93(1), 6-11.
24. Huck, S., & Weizsacker, G. (1999). Risk, complexity, and deviations from expected value maximization. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 699-715.
25. Isaac, M., & James, D. (2000). Just who are you calling risk averse? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20(2), 177-187.
26. Johnson, C., Montmarquette, C., and Eckel, C. (2003). Fostering adult education: A laboratory experiment on the efficient use of loans, grants, and saving incentives. Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.
27. Johnson, C., Eckel, C., and Engle-Warnick, J. (2007). An adaptive instrument to elicit risk preferences. Working paper, University of Montreal, 2007.
28. Kachelmeier, S., & Shehata, M. (1992). Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: Experimental evidence from the People's Republic of China. American Economic Review, 82, 1120-1141.
29. Karni, E., & Safra, Z. (1987). Preference reversal and the observability of preferences by experimental methods. Econometrica, 55(3), 675-685.
30. Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C., Mazzocco, K., & Dicker, S. (2006). Numeracy and Decision Making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407-413.
31. Slovic, P. (1962). Convergent Validation of Risk Taking Measures. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(1), 68-71.
32. Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 332-382.
33. Statistics Canada and OECD. (2003). Learning a Living: First Results of the Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey. http://www. statcan. ca/english/freepub/89-603-XIE/2005001/pdf. htm.