Assessing the impact of non-dilating the eye on full-field electroretinogram and standard flash response

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 167-175

  Gagne A M ^a   Lavoie, J ^a   Lavoie, M P ^a   Sasseville, A ^a   Charron, M C ^a   Hebert M ^a  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE DE L INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE EN SANTÉ MENTALE DE QUÉBEC   (Canada)

Author keywords

Electroretinogram; Eye dilatation; ISCEV; Photopic; Scotopic; Standard flash

Indexed keywords

XENON;

A WAVE; ADULT; ARTICLE; B WAVE; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; MALE; MYDRIASIS; NIGHT VISION; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL;

ADULT; COLOR VISION; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NIGHT VISION; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PUPIL; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649324490     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-010-9242-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Marmor MF, Holder GE, Seeliger MW, Yamamoto S (2004) Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004). Doc Ophthalmol 108:107-114
2. Marmor MF, Fulton AB, Holder GE, Miyake Y, Brigell M, Bach M (2009) ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008). Doc Ophthalmol 118:69-77
3. Decraene T, Goossens A (2001) Contact allergy to atropine and other mydriatic agents in eye drops. Contact Dermatitis 45:309-310
4. Iijima A, Haida M, Ishikawa N, Ueno A, Minamitani H, Shinohara Y (2003) Re-evaluation of tropicamide in the pupillary response test for Alzheimers disease. Neurobiol Aging 24:789-796
5. Kergoat H, Kergoat MJ, Justino L (2001) Age-related changes in the flash electroretinogram and oscillatory potentials in individuals age 75 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:1212-1217
6. Chew HF, Markowitz SN, Flanagan J, Buys YM (2007) The effect of pupil dilation on driving vision in Canada. Can J Ophthalmol 42:585-591
7. Lachapelle P (1990) A possible contribution of the optic nerve to the photopic oscillatory. Clin vision sci 5:421-426
8. Hebert M, Lachapelle P, Dumont M (1995) Reproducibility of electro retino grams recorded with DTL electrodes. Doc Ophthalmol 91:333-342
9. Lachapelle P (1987) Analysis of the photopic electroretinogram recorded before and after dark adaptation. Can J Ophthalmol 22:354-361
10. Peachey N, Alexander K, Fishman G, Derlacki D (1989) Properties of the human cone system electroretinogram during light adaptation. Appl Opt 28:1145-1150
11. Wali N, Leguire LE (1992) The photopic hill: a new phenomenon of the light adapted electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 80:335-345
12. Rufiange M, Rousseau S, Dembinska O, Lachapelle P (2002) Cone-dominated ERG luminance-response function: the Photopic Hill revisited. Doc Ophthalmol 104:231-248
13. Rufiange M, Dassa J, Dembinska O, Koenekoop RK, Little JM, Polomeno RC, Dumont M, Chemtob S, Lachapelle P (2003) The photopic ERG luminance-response function (photopic hill): method of analysis and clinical application. Vision Res 43:1405-1412
14. Fulton AB, Hansen RM (1987) The relationship of retinal sensitivity and rhodopsin in human infants. Vision Res 27:697-704
15. Dowling JE (1987) The retina. An approachable part of the brain. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
16. Joly S, Dorfman AL, Chemtob S, Moukhles H, Lachapelle P (2006) Structural and functional consequences of bright light exposure on the retina of neonatal rats. Doc Ophthalmol 113:93-103
17. Gonzalez P, Parks S, Dolan F, Keating D (2004) The effects of pupil size on the multifocal electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 109:67-72
18. Westheimer G (2008) Directional sensitivity of the retina: 75 years of stiles-Crawford effect. Proc Biol Sci 275:2777-2786
19. Massof RW, Wu L, Finkelstein D, Perry C, Starr SJ, Johnson MA (1984) Properties of electroretinographic intensity-response functions in retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol 57:279-296