Process reference model for data warehouse development: A consensus-oriented approach

ICEIS 2005 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 499-505

  Knackstedt, Ralf ^a   Klose, Karsten ^a   Niehaves, Björn ^a   Becker, Jörg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Data warehouse development; Epistemology; Management information systems; Process reference model; Theoretical foundation

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL MODELLING; DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY; DOMAIN LANGUAGE; EPISTEMOLOGY; GRAPHICAL MODEL; IS DEVELOPMENT; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION; PHASE DESIGN; PROCESS REFERENCE MODELS; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS;

DATA WAREHOUSES; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODELS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 78649299887     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Ackoff, R. L., 14 (1967), S. B-147 bis B-156., 1967. Management Misinformation Systems. Management Science, 14 (1), B 147-156.
2. Bulos, D., 1996. A New Dimension. OLAP Database Design. Database Programming & Design, 9 (6), 33- 37.
3. Devlin, B., 1997. Data Warehouse. From Architecture to Implementation. Reading, UK et al.
4. Golfarelli, M., Maio, D. and Rizzi, S., 1998. The Dimensional Fact Model - A Conceptual Model for Data Warehouse. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 7 (2-3), 215-246.
5. Golfarelli, M. and Rizzi, S., 1999. Designing the Data Warehouse: Key steps and crucial issues. Journal of Computer Science and Information Management, 2 (3).
6. Hackney, D., 1997. Understanding and Implementing Successful Data Marts. Reading, UK et al.
7. Hahn, K., Sapia, C. and Blaschka, M., 2000. Automatically Generating OLAP Schemata from Conceptual Graphical Models. In Proceedings of the ACM Third International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP (DOLAP 2000), Washington D. C., USA, 10. November 2000.
8. Hammergren, T., 1996. Data Warehousing. Building the Corporate Knowledge Base. London, UK et al.
9. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H. and Lyytinen, K., 1995. Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge/MA.
10. Holten, R., 2003. Specification of Management Views in Information Warehouse Projects. Information Systems, 28 (7), 709-751.
11. Holten, R., Dreiling, A. and Schmid, B., 2002. Management Report Engineering - A Swiss Re Business Case. In From Data Warehouse to Corporate Knowledge Center (E. Maur and R. Winter Ed.), 421- 437, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany et al.
12. Inmon, W. H., Imhoff, C. and Sousa, R., 1998. Corporate Information Factory. New York/NY, U.S.A. et al.
13. Kamlah, W. and Lorenzen, P., 1973. Logical Propaedeutic. Lanham/MD.
14. Kamlah, W. and Lorenzen, P., 1996. Logische Propädeutik. Vorschule des vernünftigen Redens. 3 Edition. Stuttgart, Weimar.
15. Keen, P. G. W., 1980. MIS Research: Reference Disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information SystemsEd.), 9-18, Philadelphia/PA.
16. Martin, E. W., 1983. Information Needs of Top MIS Managers. MIS Quarterly, 7 (3), 1-11.
17. Mingers, J., 2001. Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12/2001/3, 240-259.
18. Munro, M. C. and Davis, G. B., 1977. Determing Management Information Needs: A Comparision of Methods. MIS Quarterly, 1 (2), 55-67.
19. Niehaves, B., 2004. A Framework for Analysing the Epistemological Assumptions of Research Methods. In Proceedings of the Innovation Through Information Technology. 2004 IRMA International Conference (M. Khosrow-Pour Ed.), 57-60, New Orleans/LA, U.S.A.
20. Niehaves, B., Klose, K., Knackstedt, R. and Becker, J., 2005. Epistemological Perspectives on ISDevelopment - A Consensus-Oriented Approach on Conceptual Modeling. Accepted for the Second International Workshop on Philosophy and Informatics (WSPI 2005), Ulm, Germany.
21. Poe, V., 1996. Building a Data Warehouse for Decision Support. New Jersey.
22. Riebel, P., 1979. Gestaltungsprobleme einer zweckneutralen Grundrechnung. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 31 (1), 863-893.
23. Rockart, J. F., 1979. Chief Executives define their own Data Needs. Harvard Business Review, 30 (Mar-Apr), 81-93.
24. Sapia, C., Blaschka, M., Höfling, G. and Dinter, B., 1998. Extending the E/R Model for the Multidimensional Paradigm. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Data Warehouse and Data Mining (DWDM'98), 105-116, Singapur, 19.-20. November 1998.
25. Sethi, V. and Teng, J. T. C., 1988. Choice of Information Requirements Analysis Method: An Integrated Approach. INFOR, 26 (1), 1-16.
26. Szyperski, N., 1980. Informationsbedarf. In Handwörterbuch der Organisation (E. Grochla Ed.), 904-913, 2. Ed. Stuttgart.
27. Tarski, A., 1944. The Semantic Concept of Truth and the foundation of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4/1944, 341-375.
28. Wedekind, H., 1992. Datenbanksysteme I. Eine konstruktive Einführung in die Datenverarbeitung in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung. 2. Ed. Mannheim et al.