Quality improvement demands quality measurement

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 117, Issue 13, 2010, Pages 1571-1574

  Draycott, T ^a   Sibanda, T ^b   Laxton, C ^a   Winter, C ^a   Mahmood, T ^c   Fox, R ^d  

^a SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b HUTT HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^c ROYAL COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNAECOLOGISTS   (United Kingdom)

^d MUSGROVE PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERTIFICATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MONITORING; QUALITY CONTROL; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 78649264673     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02734.x     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Healthcare Commission. Summary of the intervention at Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. 2008 [cited 21 February 2010]; Available from:.
2. NHS Litigation Authority. Risk Management Standards. 2009 [cited 21 February 2010]; Available from:.
3. Marko WH,. Changing practice - a view from the clinical negligence scheme for trusts. In:, Shaw RW, editor. CESDI 8th Annual Report. CESDI: London; 2001. pp. 101 - 8.
4. Collins KJ, Barnfield S, Scholefield H, Draycott T,. Is there a Correlation between Trust Maternity CNST Level and Obstetric Claims? British Congress of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. RCOG: London; 2007.
5. Draycott TJ, Sibanda T, Owen L, Akande V, Winter C, Reading S, et al. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 14 - 20.
6. MacKenzie IZ, Shah M, Lean K, Dutton S, Newdick H, Tucker DE,. Management of shoulder dystocia: trends in incidence and maternal and neonatal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1059 - 68.
7. Association of Public Health Observatories. The Good Indicators Guide: Understanding How to Use and Choose Indicators. London: Association of Public Health Observatories & NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, 2008.
8. Healthcare Commission editor. Towards Better Births A Review of Maternity Services in England. London: Healthcare Commission, 2008.
9. Redshaw M,. Recorded Delivery - a Study of Women's Experience of Maternity Care. NPEU: Oxford, 2007.
10. Siassakos D, Clark J, Sibanda T, Attilakos G, Jefferys A, Cullen L, et al. A simple tool to measure patient perceptions of operative birth. BJOG 2009; 116: 1755 - 61.
11. Arulkumaran S, Chandraharan E, Mahmood T, Louca O, Mannion C,. Maternity dashboard: clinical performance and governance score card. In: RCOG, editor. Good Practice Guidelines. RCOG: London; 2008. pp. 1 - 8.
12. Sibanda T,. A statistically informed dashboard. 2009 [cited 21 February 2010]; Available from:.
13. Sibanda T, Sibanda N, Siassakos D, Sivananthan S, Robinson Z, Winter C, et al. Prospective evaluation of a continuous monitoring and quality-improvement system for reducing adverse neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 480.e1 - 6.
14. Siassakos D, Crofts JF, Winter C, Weiner CP, Draycott TJ,. The active components of effective training in obstetric emergencies. BJOG 2009; 116: 1028 - 32.
15. Darzi A,. Quality and the NHS next stage review. Lancet 2008; 371: 1563 - 4.