Effect of specimen geometry on tensile strength of cortical bone

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 95 A, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 580-587

  Feng, Liang ^a   Jasiuk, Iwona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

cortical bone; finite element analysis; specimen geometry; tensile strength; tensile testing

Indexed keywords

COMMONLY USED; CORTICAL BONE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIGH STRESS CONCENTRATION; LOCAL STRESS CONCENTRATION; PORCINE FEMURS; SPECIMEN GEOMETRY; STRIP SPECIMEN; TENSILE TESTS; ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH;

BONE; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATERIALS TESTING APPARATUS; STRESS CONCENTRATION; TENSILE TESTING;

TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; NONHUMAN; SWINE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANIMALS; FEMUR; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SWINE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 78649237882     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32837     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Guo EX,. Mechanical properties of cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. In:, Cowin SC, editor. Bone Mechanics Handbook. Florida: CRC Press LLC; 2001. p 7-8.
2. McElhaney J, fogle J, Byars E, Weaver G,. Effect of embalming on the mechanical properties of beef bone. J Appl Physiol 1964; 19: 1234-1236.
3. McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, Courtbrown CM,. Age-related-changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone: The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75A: 1193-1205.
4. Evans FG, Lebow M,. Regional differences in some of the physical properties of the human femur. J Appl Physiol 1951; 3: 563-572.
5. Reilly DT, Burstein AH, Frankel VH,. The elastic modulus for bone. J Biomech 1975; 7: 271-275.
6. Kotha SP, Guzelsu N,. Tensile damage and its effects on cortical bone. J Biomech 2003; 36: 1683-1689.
7. Kotha SP, Guzelsu N,. Effect of bone mineral content on the tensile properties of cortical bone: Experiments and theory. J Biomech Eng: Trans ASME 2003; 125: 785-793.
8. Kotha SP, Guzelsu N,. Modeling the tensile mechanical behavior of bone along the longitudinal direction. J Theor Biol 2002; 219: 269-279.
9. Bowman SM, Zeind JJ, Gibson LJ, Hayes WC, McMahon TA,. The tensile behavior of demineralized bovine cortical bone. J Biomech 1996; 29: 1497-1501.
10. Burstein AH, Reilly DT, Martens M,. Aging of bone tissue: Mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58: 82-86.
11. Winwood K, Zioupos P, Currey JD, Cotton JR, Taylor M,. Strain patterns during tensile, compressive, and shear fatigue of human cortical bone and implications for bone biomechanics. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2006; 79: 289-297.
12. Harvey KB, Drummer TD, Donahue SW,. The tensile strength of black bear (Ursus americanus) cortical bone is not compromised with aging despite annual periods of hibernation. J Biomech 2005; 38: 2143-2150.
13. Currey JD,. Physical characteristics affecting the tensile failure properties of compact bone. J Biomech 1990; 23: 837-844.
14. Vincentelli R, Grigorov M,. The effect of haversian remodeling on the tensile properties of human cortical bone. J Biomech 1985; 18: 201-207.
15. Cezayirlioglu H, Bahniuk E, Davy DT, Heiple KG,. Anisotropic yield behavior of bone under combined axial force and torque. J Biomech 1985; 18: 61-69.
16. Simkin A, Robin G,. Mechanical testing of bone in bending. J Biomech 1973; 6: 31-39.
17. Currey JD,. Tensile yield in compact bone is determined by strain, post-yield behavior by mineral content. J Biomech 2004; 37: 549-556.
18. Kotha SP, Walsh WR, Pan Y, Guzelsu N,. Varying the mechanical properties of bone tissue by changing the amount of its structurally effective bone mineral content. Biomed Mater Eng 1998; 8: 321-334.
19. Walsh WR, Ohno M, Guzelsu N,. Bone composite behavior: Effects of mineral organic bonding. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1994; 5: 72-79.
20. Claes LE, Wilke HJ, Kiefer H,. Osteonal structure better predicts tensile strength of healing bone than volume fraction. J Biomech 1995; 28: 1377-1390.
21. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. D638-08. Philadelphia: 2006.
22. Dong XN, Guo XE,. Prediction of cortical bone elastic constants by a two-level micromechanical model using a generalized self-consistent method. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 2006; 128: 309-316.
23. Bedford A, Liechti KM,. Mechanics of Materials. Austin: Prentice-Hall Inc; 2000. p 520-526.
24. Michell JH,. On the direct determination of stress in an elastic solid, with application to the theory of plates. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. 1899; 31: 100-125.
25. Jasiuk I,. Stress invariance and exact relations in the mechanics of composite materials: Extensions of the CLM result-A review. Mech Mater 2009; 41: 394-404.
26. Jasiuk I, Chen J, Thorpe MF,. Elastic moduli of two dimensional materials with polygonal and elliptical holes. Appl Mech Rev 1994; 47: 518-528.
27. Moran B, Gosh M,. Stress invariance in plane anisotropic elasticity. Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng 1994; 2: 677-688.
28. Cherkaev A, Lurie K, Milton GW,. Invariant properties of the stress in plane elasticity and equivalence classes of composites. Proc Royal Soc A 1992; 438: 519-529.
29. Suo Z,. Singularities, interfaces and cracks in dissimilar anisotropic media. Proc Royal Soc A 1990; 427: 331-358.