Inversion transduction grammar for joint phrasal translation modeling

Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2007/AMTA Workshop on Syntax and Structure in Statistical Translation, SSST 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 17-24

  Cherry, Colin ^a   Lin, Dekang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b GOOGLE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; SYNTACTICS; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

ALIGNMENT METHODS; CONSISTENCY CONSTRAINTS; EM TRAINING; INVERSION TRANSDUCTION GRAMMARS; PHRASAL TRANSLATION; TRANSLATION MODELS; VITERBI; WORD ALIGNMENT;

BACTERIOPHAGES;

EID: 78649234442     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. A. Birch, C. Callison-Burch, M. Osborne, and P. Koehn. 2006. Constraining the phrase-based, joint probability statistical translation model. In HLT-NAACL Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 154-157.
2. P. F. Brown, S. A. Della Pietra, V. J. Della Pietra, and R. L. Mercer. 1993. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):263-312.
3. C. Cherry and D. Lin. 2006. A comparison of syntactically motivated word alignment spaces. In EACL, pages 145-152.
4. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39(1):1-38.
5. A. Fraser and D. Marcu. 2006. Semi-supervised training for statistical word alignment. In ACL, pages 769-776.
6. P. Koehn and C. Monz. 2006. Manual and automatic evaluation of machine translation. In HLT-NACCL Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 102-121.
7. P. Koehn, F. J. Och, and D. Marcu. 2003. Statistical phrase-based translation. In HLT-NAACL, pages 127-133.
8. D. Marcu and W. Wong. 2002. A phrase-based, joint probability model for statistic machine translation. In EMNLP, pages 133-139.
9. I. D. Melamed. 1998. Manual annotation of translational equivalence: The blinker project. Technical Report 98-07, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science.
10. I. D. Melamed. 2003. Multitext grammars and synchronous parsers. In HLT-NAACL, pages 158-165.
11. F. J. Och and H. Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computational Linguistics, 29(1):19-52.
12. F. J. Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training for statistical machine translation. In ACL, pages 160-167.
13. K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W. J. Zhu. 2002. BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In ACL, pages 311-318.
14. A. Venugopal and S. Vogel. 2005. Considerations in maximum mutual information and minimum classification error training for statistical machine translation. In EAMT.
15. J. M. Vilar and E. Vidal. 2005. A recursive statistical translation model. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Building and Using Parallel Texts, pages 199-207.
16. S. Vogel, Y. Zhang, F. Huang, A. Tribble, A. Venugopal, B. Zhang, and A. Waibel. 2003. The CMU statistical machine translation system. In MT Summmit.
17. D. Wu. 1997. Stochastic inversion transduction grammars and bilingual parsing of parallel corpora. Computational Linguistics, 23(3):377-403.
18. H. Zhang and D. Gildea. 2004. Syntax-based alignment: Supervised or unsupervised? In COLING, pages 418-424.
19. H. Zhang and D. Gildea. 2005. Stochastic lexicalized inversion transduction grammar for alignment. In ACL, pages 475-482.
20. H. Zhang, L. Huang, D. Gildea, and K. Knight. 2006. Synchronous binarization for machine translation. In HLT-NAACL, pages 256-263.