Performance evaluation of universities in China based on ESI database

PICMET '10 - Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings - Technology Management for Global Economic Growth

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 2416-2423

  Cao, Yan ^a   Tong, He Feng ^a   Yu, Jie ^a   Chen, Dar Zen ^b   Huang, Mu Hsuan ^b   Zhang, Xu ^a   Luo, Yong ^a   Zhao, Yun Hua ^a   Zhang, Ze Yu ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION OF CHINA   (China)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE; BIBLIOMETRIC; CITED PAPERS; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; IMPACT INDICATORS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE; SCIENCE INDICATORS;

ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 78549272728     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Cheng Y. and Liu N.C., "Mapping the Development of Chinese Top Universities in Recent Years Based on Scientometric Indicators," Science of Science and Management of S. & T. (in Chinese), Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 132-138, 2007.
2. Colman, A. M., D. Dhillon and B. Coulthard, "A bibliometric evaluation of the research performance of British university politics departments: Publications in leading journals," Scientometrics, Vol. 32, NO.1, pp. 49-66, 1995.
3. Garfield, E.; "Citation indexes to sciences: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas," Science, vol.122, pp.108-111, 1955.
4. Guz, A.N., J.J. Rushchitsky and I.S. Chernyshenko, "On a modern philosophy of evaluating scientific publication," International Applied Mechanics, Vol. 41, No. 10, pp. 3-11, 2005.
5. Moed, H. F. and M.S. Visser, "Developing Bibliometric Indicators of Research Performance in Computer Science: An Exploratory Study," Research Report to the Council for Physical Sciences of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), Feb. 2007, Retrieved 12/15/09 World Wide Web, www.cwts.nl/pdf/NWO-Inf-Final-Report-V-210207.pdf
6. Moed, H. F., W. J. M. Burge, J. G. Frankfort and A. F. J. Van Raan, "A comparative study of bibliometric past performance analysis and peer judgement," Scientometrics, Vol. 8, NO.3-4, pp.149-159, 1985.
7. Herbertz, H. and B. MÜLLER-HILL, "Quality and efficiency of basic research in molecular biology: A bibliometric analysis of thirteen excellent research institutes," Research Policy, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 959-979, 1995.
8. He T. W., J. L. Zhang and L. R. Teng, "Basic research in biochemistry and molecular biology in China: A bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 249-259, 2005.
9. Hu X. J.; "Relative Superiority Coefficient of papers: A new dimension for institutional research performance in different fields," Scientometrics, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 389-402, 2007.
10. Hu X. J. and R. Rousseau, "A comparative study of the difference in research performance in biomedical fields among selected Western and Asian countries," Scientometrics, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp.475-491, 2009.
11. Huang M. H., H.W. Chang and D. Z. Chen, "Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003," Scientometrics, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 419-435, 2006.
12. ISTIC (Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China), "Annual Research Report of Chinese Science and Technology Papers Statistics and Analysis (1998-2008) (in Chinese)," ISTIC, Beijing, 1999-2009.
13. Kim, M. J. and B. J. Kim, "A bibliometric analysis of publications by the Chemistry Department, Seoul National University, Korea, 1992-1998," Journal of Information Science, Vol.26, NO.2, pp. 111-119, 2000.
14. Malcieni, L.; "Scientometric analysis of a scientific school", Scientometrics, VoL.15, Nos.1-2, pp. 73-85, 1989.
15. Meng W., Z. H. Hu and W. B. Liu, "Efficiency evaluation of basic research in China," Scientometrics, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 85-101, 2006.
16. Nederhof, A. J. and C. M. Noyons, "Assessment of the international standing of university departments' research: A comparison of bibliometric methods," Scientometrics, Vol. 24, NO.3, pp.393-404, 1992.
17. Pomfret, R. and L. C. Wang, "Evaluating the research output of Australian universities' economics departments," Australian Economic Papers, Vol.42, NO.4, pp. 418-441, 2003.
18. Pouris A.; "The international performance of the South African academic institutions: a citation assessment," High Education, vol.54, pp. 501-509, 2007.
19. Thomson Scientific, "Citation thresholds," In-cites, Retrieved 12/08/09 World Wide Web, http://in-cites.com/thresholds-highly-cited.html
20. Wu Y. S. and L. M. Liang, "Some Issues in Quantitative Evaluation of Research Performance Based on Bibliometric Indicators," Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodical, Vol. 12, No.2, pp. 110-111, 2001.
21. Zachos, G.; "Research output evaluation of two University Departments in Greece with the use of bibliometric indicators," Scientometrics, Vol. 21, NO.2, pp. 195-221, 1991.
22. Zhang H. Q.; "Research Performance in key medical universities in China observed from the scientific productivity," Scientometrics, Vol. 37, No.1, pp. 177-190, 1996.