Measured and estimated ground reaction forces for multi-segment foot models

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 43, Issue 16, 2010, Pages 3222-3226

  Bruening, Dustin A ^a   Cooney, Kevin M ^a   Buczek, Frank L ^a,b   Richards, James G ^c  

^a SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Foot model; Ground reaction force; Multi segment foot; Plantar shear; Shear force

Indexed keywords

FOOT MODEL; GROUND REACTION FORCES; MULTI-SEGMENT; PLANTAR SHEAR; SHEAR FORCE;

ERRORS;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOREFOOT; GAIT; GROUND REACTION FORCE; HALLUX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; SCHOOL CHILD; STANDING; TARSAL JOINT; TASK PERFORMANCE; WALKING;

ADOLESCENT; ANKLE JOINT; BIOMECHANICS; CHILD; FEMALE; FOOT; FOREFOOT, HUMAN; GAIT; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; WALKING;

EID: 78549267443     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abuzzahab F.S., Harris G.F., Kidder S.M. A kinetic model of the foot and ankle. Gait and Posture 1997, 5(2):148.
2. Baker R., Robb J. Foot models for clinical gait analysis. Gait and Posture 2006, 23(4):399-400.
3. Bryant A., Singer K., Tinley P. Comparison of the reliability of plantar pressure measurements using the two-step and midgait methods of data collection. Foot and Ankle International 1999, 20(10):646-650.
4. Cowley, M., 2001. A multi-segment kinematic and kinetic foot model for clinical decision making. M.S. Thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
5. Davis B.L., Perry J.E., Neth D.C., Waters K.C. A device for simultaneous measurement of pressure and shear force distribution on the plantar surface of the foot. Journal of Applied Biomechanics 1998, 14(1):93-104.
6. Giacomozzi C., Benedetti M.G., Leardini A., Macellari V., Giannini S. Gait analysis with an integrated system for functional assessment of talocalcaneal coalition. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2006, 96(2):107-115.
7. Giacomozzi C., Macellari V. Piezo-dynamometric platform for a more complete analysis of foot-to-floor interaction. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 1997, 5(4):322-330.
8. Giacomozzi C., Macellari V., Leardini A., Benedetti M.G. Integrated pressure-force-kinematics measuring system for the characterisation of plantar foot loading during locomotion. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2000, 38(2):156-163.
9. Grabiner M.D., Feuerbach J.W., Lundin T.M., Davis B.L. Visual guidance to force plates does not influence ground reaction force variability. Journal of Biomechanics 1995, 28(9):1115-1117.
10. Mackey J.R., Davis B.L. Simultaneous shear and pressure sensor array for assessing pressure and shear at foot/ground interface. Journal of Biomechanics 2006, 39(15):2893-2897.
11. MacWilliams B.A., Cowley M., Nicholson D.E. Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait. Gait and Posture 2003, 17(3):214-224.
12. McPoil T.G., Cornwall M.W., Dupuis L., Cornwell M. Variability of plantar pressure data. A comparison of the two-step and midgait methods. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 1999, 89(10):495-501.
13. Meyers-Rice B., Sugars L., McPoil T., Cornwall M.W. Comparison of three methods for obtaining plantar pressures in nonpathologic subjects. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 1994, 84(10):499-504.
14. Patla A.E., Robinson C., Samways M., Armstrong C.J. Visual control of step length during overground locomotion: task specific modulation of the locomotor synergy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:603-617.
15. Saraswat, P., Andersen, M.S., Macwilliams, B.A., 2010. A musculoskeletal foot model for clinical gait analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Joint Meeting of the European Society of Movement Analysis for Adults and Children and the Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Society, Miami, FL.
16. Sarrafian S.K. Functional characteristics of the foot and plantar aponeurosis under tibiotalar loading. Foot and Ankle 1987, 8(1):4-18.
17. Scott S.H., Winter D.A. Biomechanical model of the human foot: kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. Journal of Biomechanics 1993, 26(9):1091-1104.
18. Wearing S.C., Urry S.R., Smeathers J.E. Ground reaction forces at discrete sites of the foot derived from pressure plate measurements. Foot and Ankle International 2001, 22(8):653-661.
19. Yavuz M., Botek G., Davis B.L. Plantar shear stress distributions: comparing actual and predicted frictional forces at the foot-ground interface. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40(13):3045-3049.