Re-examining uranium supply and demand: New insights

Energy Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 358-376

  Kahouli, Sondès ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Nuclear installed capacity; Simultaneous system of equations; Uranium supply demand

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; COSTS; FOSSIL FUELS; GOLD; NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENTS; PUBLIC POLICY; URANIUM;

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION; ELECTRICITY PRICES; EXOGENOUS VARIABLES; INSTALLED CAPACITY; NUCLEAR GENERATING CAPACITY; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; SYSTEM OF EQUATIONS; URANIUM SUPPLIES;

COMPETITION;

DEMAND ANALYSIS; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY POLICY; ESTIMATION METHOD; FOSSIL FUEL; NUCLEAR ACCIDENT; URANIUM;

EID: 78549257378     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Amavilah V.H.S. The influence of oil and coal prices on the world uranium demand. OPEC Review 1994, 18(4):489-508.
2. Amavilah V.H.S. The capitalist world aggregate supply and demand model for natural uranium. Energy Economics 1995, 17(3):211-220.
3. Ayres, M., MacRae, M., Stogran, M., 2004. Levelised unit electricity cost comparison of alternative technologies for baseload generation in Ontario. Technical Report, Canadian Energy Research Institute http://www.ceri.ca/Publications/LUECReport.pdf.
4. Barré B. The future of nuclear energy in the world. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 1998, 271-273:1-5.
5. Basheer Ahmed, S., 1979. Nuclear Fuel and Energy Policy. Princeton University, Center of International Studies, Lexington, Massachusetts, Toronto, ISBN no. 0-669-02714-6.
6. Boot J.C.G., Feibes W., Lisman J.H.C. Further methods of derivation of quarterly figures from annual data. Applied Statistics 1967, 16(1):65-75.
7. Bourdaire, J.M., Paffenbarger, J., 1997. Nuclear power and sustainable development. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Uranium and Nuclear Energy. Uranium Institute, London, UK, pp. 1-11.
8. Breusch T. Testing for autocorrelation in dynamic linear models. Australian Economic Paper 1978, 17:344-356.
9. British Petroleum, B., 2009. BP Statistical review of world energy, London, UK, June http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview.
10. Chae K., Lee D., Lim C., Lee B. The role of nuclear energy system for korean long-term energy supply strategy. Progress in Nuclear Energy 1995, 29:71-78.
11. Chakravorty, U., Magné, B., Moreaux, M., 2009. Can nuclear power supply clean energy in the long run? A model with endogenous substitution of resources. University of Alberta, Department of Economics, Working Paper no.: 2009-19 http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:albaec:2009-019.
12. Chow G., Lin A.L. Review of economic and statistics. Best Linear Unbiased Distribution and Extrapolation of Economic Time Series by Related Series 1971, 53(4):372-375.
13. Crowson, P., 2007. Uranium markets: somewhere over the rainbow? In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Uranium and Nuclear Energy. Uranium Institute, London, UK, pp. 129-130.
14. Crowson, P., Gehrisch, W., 1991. Nuclear fuel supply and demand to 2010: a world view. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Uranium and Nuclear Energy. Uranium Institute, London, UK, pp. 39-60.
15. De Montessus, S., 2008. How could we secure the sustainability of uranium mining business in growing market? In: Proceedings of the 33th International Symposium on Uranium and Nuclear Energy. World Nuclear Association (WNA), London, UK, pp. 92-93.
16. Denton F.T. Adjustment of monthly or quarterly series to annual totals: an approach based on quadratic minimization. Journal of the American Statistical Society 1971, 66(333):99-102.
17. DGEMP, 2003. Reference costs for power generation. Technical Report, Direction générale de l'énergie et des matières premières, France.
18. Di Fonzo T. the estimation of M disaggregate time series when contemporaneous and temporal aggregates are known. Review of Economic and Statistics 1990, 72:178-182.
19. DOE-EIA, 2009. Annual energy review 2008. DOE/EIA-0384(2008), Washington, DC 20585 http://www.eia.doe.gov/aer.
20. Einbund, D., 2004. Is there a renaissance in nuclear fuel. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Uranium and Nuclear Energy. Uranium Institute, London, UK, pp. 1-8.
21. Esposto S. The possible role of nuclear energy in Italy. Energy Policy 2008, 36(5):1584-1588.
22. Fernández R.B. Methodological note on the estimation of time series. Review of Economic and Statistics 1981, 63(3):471-478.
23. Godfrey L. Testing for higher order serial correlation in regression equation when the regressor contain lagged dependant variables. Econometrica 1978, 46:1303-1310.
24. Greenwood J. Uranium supply and demand: the fifth annual symposium of the uranium institute, London, 2-4 September 1980. Energy Policy 1981, 9(2):170-171.
25. Guerrero V. Temporal disaggregation of time series: an ARIMA-based approach. International Statistical Review 1990, 58(1):29-46.
26. Guerrero V., Martínez J. A recursive ARIMA-based procedure for disaggregating a time series variable using concurrent data. Test 1995, 4(2):359-376.
27. Gujarati, D.N., 1995. Basic Econometrics, third ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, ISBN no. 0-07-025214-9.
28. Harvey A. The Econometric Analysis of Time Series 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, UK. second ed.
29. Hausman J. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 1978, 46(6):1251-1271.
30. Hotelling H. The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of Public Economy 1931, 39:137-175.
31. IEA, 2005. Projected costs of generating electricity-2005 update. Technical Report, OECD, Paris, France.
32. IEA, 2009. Electricity Information 2009, Paris, France, ISBN no. 978-92-64-06111-8 http://www.iea.org/w/bookshop/add.aspx?id=34.
33. Klein L.R. A Texbook of Econometrics 1974, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. second ed.
34. Krautkraemer J.A. Non-renewable resource scarcity. Journal of Economic Literature 1998, XXXVI:2065-2107.
35. Layton, M., 2008. The global uranium outlook: is 2008/09 a buying opportunity? In: Proceedings of the 33th International Symposium on Uranium and Nuclear Energy. World Nuclear Association (WNA), London, UK, pp. 1-11.
36. Litterman R.B. A random walk, Markov model for the distribution of time series. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1983, 1(2):169-173.
37. Maeda, H., 2005. The global nuclear fuel market-supply and demand-2005-2030. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Uranium and Nuclear Energy. Uranium Institute, London, UK, pp. 1-11.
38. Mays, W.M., 2005. Limitations to progress in developing uranium resources. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Uranium and Nuclear Energy. World Nuclear Association (WNA), London, UK, pp. 39-60.
39. MIT, 2003. The future of nuclear power. Technical Report. An Interdisciplinary MIT Study, UK, ISBN 0-615-12420-8.
40. Mullins J. Warning sounded for world's uranium supplies. The New Scientist 2009, 204(2736):10.
41. Nations Center on Transnational Corporations, U., 1983. Transnational Corporations on Contractual Relations in the World Uranium Industry. UN Publications, New York.
42. Nerlove M. Estimates of supply of selected agricultural commodities. Journal of Farm Economics 1956, 38:397-496.
43. Newcomb, R., Reiber, M., 1984. The economics of coal and nuclear energy. In: Economics of the Mineral Industries: A Series of Articles by Specialists, fourth ed. AIMMPE, New York.
44. OECD/IEA, 2006. World Energy Outlook, Paris, France, ISBN no. 92-64-10989-7 http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2006/weo2006.pdf.
45. OECD/IEA, 2009. World Energy Outlook, Paris, France, ISBN no. 978-92-64-06130-9 http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/2009.asp.
46. OECD/IEA/NEA, 2005. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity. OECD Publishing no. 53955, Paris, France, ISBN no. 92-64-00826-8 http://www.iea.org/Textbase/publications/free-new-Desc.asp?PUBS-ID=1472.
47. OECD/NEA, 2006. Forty Years of Uranium Resources, Production and Demand in Perspective: The Red Book Retrospective, the Red Book ed. OECD Publishing/NEA no. 6096, Paris, France, ISBN no. 92-64-02806-4.
48. OECD/NEA, 2008. NEA News. NEA Publications, 26-ISSN 1605-9581.
49. OECD/NEA-IAEA, 1987. Nuclear Energy and its Fuel Cycle: Prospects to 2025, the Yellow Book ed. OECD Publishing/NEA no. 6346, Paris, France.
50. OECD/NEA-IAEA, 2006. Uranium 2005: Ressources, production et demande, le livre rouge/the Red Book ed. OECD Publishing/NEA no. 6099, Paris, France, ISBN no. 92-64-02427-1.
51. OECD/NEA-IAEA, 2008. Uranium 2007: Ressources, production et demande, le livre rouge/the Red Book ed. OECD Publishing/NEA no. 6346, Paris, France, ISBN no. 978-92-64-04770-9.
52. Owen A.D. An economic model of the US uranium market. Materials and Society 1984, 8:137-152.
53. Owen A.D. The Economics of Uranium 1985, Praeger, New York.
54. Patterson J.A. World Uranium Supply and Demand 1970, IAEA publishing, Paris, France.
55. Percebois, J., Décembre 2008. Prix internationaux du pétrole, du gaz naturel, de l'uranium et du charbon: La théorie économique nous aide-t-elle à comprendre les évolutions. Conseil français de l'énergie.
56. Price T. Uranium supplies and nuclear energy policy. Energy Policy 1984, 12(3):266-270.
57. RAE, 2004. The cost of generating electricity. a commentary on a study carried out by PB power for the Royal Academy of Engineering (RAE). Technical Report, UK http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/Cost-Generation-Commentary.pdf.
58. Reuters Datastream, T., 2009, September. http://online.thomsonreuters.com/datastream/.
59. Rossi N. A note on the estimation of disaggregate time series when the aggregate is known. Review of Economic and Statistics 1982, 64(4):695-696.
60. Sailor W.C., Bodansky D., Braun S., Van der Zwaan B.C.C. A nuclear solution to climate change. Science 2000, 288(May):1177-1178.
61. Santos Silva J.M.C., Cardoso F. The Chow-Lin method using dynamic models. Economic Modelling 2001, 18:269-280.
62. 2 emissions-the role of nuclear energy. Progress in Nuclear Energy 1998, 32(3/4):323-330.
63. Stephany M., Bauder P., Lurf G. Uranium stockpiles: their influence on the market for natural uranium. Resources Policy 1981, 7(4):226-234.
64. Stram D.O., Wei W.W.S. A methodological note in the disaggregation of time series totals. Journal of Time Series Analysis 1986, 7(4):293-302.
65. Tarjanne, R., Luostarinen, K., 2004. Competitiveness comparison of the electricity production alternatives. Technical Report, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland, ISBN 951-764-895-2 http://oa.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/31043/TMP.objres.617.pdf?sequence=1.
66. Thomas N. The International Uranium Market 1984, Ballinger, New York.
67. Tolley G.S., Jones D.W. The Economic Future of Nuclear Power 2004, University of Chicago, Department of Economics, USA, August.
68. Trieu L.H., Savage E., Dwyer G. A model for the world uranium market. Energy policy 1994, 22(4):317-329.
69. UxC, 2009. Uranium market outlook: quarterly market report (Q1). Technical Report, Ux Consulting http://www.uxc.com.
70. Uyterlinde, M., Martinus, G., Rösler, H., Van der Zwaan, B., Szabo, L., Russ, P., Mantzos, L., Zeak-Passhou, M., Blesl, M., Ellersdorfer, I., Fahl, U., Böhringer, C., Löschel, A., Pratlong, F., Le Mouel, P., Hayhow, I., Kydes, A., Martin, L., Rafaj, P., Kypreos, S., Sano, F., Akimoto, K., Homma, T., Tomoda, T., 2006. The contribution of nuclear energy to a sustainable energy system. CASCADE MINTS Project, vol. 3. Technical Report, Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, ECN-C-05-085.
71. Van der Zwaan B. Nuclear energy: tenfold expansion or phase-out?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2002, 69:287-307.
72. Van der Zwaan B. Nuclear power and global climate change: security concerns of Asian developing countries. Resources Energy and Development 2004, 1:1-18.
73. Van der Zwaan B. Prospects for nuclear energy in Europe. Journal of Global Energy Issues 2008, 30(1/2/3/4):102-121.
74. WNA, 2003. The new economics of nuclear power. Technical Report, World Nuclear Association http://www.world-nuclear.org/reference/pdf/economics.pdf.
75. WNA, 2008. The economics of nuclear power. Technical Report, World Nuclear Association, August. http://www.world-nuclear.org/uploadedFiles/org/info/pdf/EconomicsNP.pdf.
76. Yangbo, D., Parsons, J.E., 2009. Update on the cost of nuclear power. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Research (CEEPR), Cambridge, UK, no. 09-004, May. http://www.mit.edu/~jparsons/publications/2009-004.pdf.
77. Zellner A. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and the task for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1962, 57:348-368.
78. Zellner A. Estimation of seemingly unrelated regressions: some exact finite sample results. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1963, 58:977-992.
79. Zellner A., Theil H. Three-stage least square: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica 1962, 30(1):54-78.