The influence of material support kind on the biological moving bed reactors performance used for the carbon removal and nitrification of sewage;Influência do tipo de material suporte no desempenho de reatores biológicos de leito móvel na remoção de carbono e nitrificação de esgoto sanitário

Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 149-154

  Wolff, Delmira Beatriz ^a   Paul, Etienne ^b   da Costa, Rejane Helena Ribeiro ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA   (Brazil)

^b UMR792 INGÉNIERIE DES SYSTÈMES BIOLOGIQUES ET DES PROCÉDÉS   (France)

^c Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental da UFSC

Author keywords

Carbon; Hybrid reactor; Nitrogen; Sludge retention time; Support material; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 78549238553     PISSN: 14134152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-41522010000200007     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. American Public Health Association (Apha). American Water Works Association (AWWA). Water Environment Federation. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21 ed. Washington DC, USA, 2004.
2. Fletcher, M. Adherence of marine-microorganims to smooth surfaces. In: BEACHEY, E.H. (Ed.). Bacterial Adherence. Londres: Chapman and Hall, 1980. p. 345-398.
3. Liu, Y. Dynamique de croissance de biofilms nitrifiants appliqués aux traitements des eaux. Thèse (Doctorat Ingenierie du Traitement et L'Epuration des Eaux), INSA. Toulouse, France, 1994. 255p.
4. Mannina, G.; Viviani, G. Hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: an effective solution for upgrading a large wastewater treatment plant. Water Science and Technology, v. 60, n. 5, p.1103-1116, 2009.
5. OCHOA, J.C.Et Al. Active heterotrophic and autotrophic biomass distribution between fixed and suspended systems in a hybrid biological reactor. Water Science and Technology, v. 46, n. 1-2, p. 397-404, 2002.
6. Ødegaard, H. Innovations in wastewater treatment: the moving bed biofilm process. Water Science and Technology, v. 53, n. 9, p. 17-33, 2006.
7. Ødegaard, H.; Gisvold, B.; Strickland, J. The influence of carrier size and shape in the moving bed biofilm process. Water Science and Technology, v. 41, n. 4-5 p. 383-391, 2000.
8. Oyanedel, V. Et Al. Comparison and modelling of the growth of heterotrophs and nitrifiers in biofilm and hybrid airlift reactors. In: International specialized conference on biofilm monitoring. Porto, Portugal, p. 241-244. 2002.
9. Villamar, C.A. et al. Aerobic moving bed bioreactor performance: a comparative study of removal efficiences of kraft mill effluents from pinus radiata and Eucalypts globulus as raw material. Water Science and Technology, v. 59, n. 3, p. 507-514, 2009.
10. TM media at a plant in Singapore. Water Science and Technology, v. 49, n. 11-12, p. 199-205, 2004.
11. Wolff, D.B; Paul, E.; Costa, R.H. Reatores híbridos: uma nova alternativa para o tratamento de efluentes. Saneamento Ambiental, v. 111, p. 30-33, 2005.
12. Zhao, Y. et al. Municipal wastewater treatment by moving - bed biofilm reactor with Diatomaceous earth as carriers. Water Environment Research, v. 78, n. 4, 2006